Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0712.4163 · Communications in Mathematical Physics

The Probability of Entanglement

William Arveson

Published Oct 15, 2008• 11 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s00220-008-0661-8

Related papers

Quantum entanglement

MB

The New Scientist•May 1, 2024•0 citations

Entangled probability distributions

Vladimir N. Chernega, Olga V. Man’ko, Vladimir I. Man’ko

Concept of entangled probability distribution of several random variables is introduced. These probability distributions describe multimode quantum states in probability representation of quantum mechanics. Example of entangled probability distribution is considered.

arXiv:2302.13065•Feb 25, 2023•0 citations

Jagged Islands of Bound Entanglement and Witness-Parameterized Probabilities

Paul B. Slater

We report several witness-parameterized families of bound-entangled probabilities. Two pertain to the $d=3$ (two-qutrit) and a third to the $d=4$ (two-ququart) subsets analyzed by Hiesmayr and L{ö}ffler of "magic" simplices of Bell states. The Hilbert-Schmidt probabilities of positive-partial-transpose (PPT) states--within which we search for bound-entangled states--are $\frac{8 π}{27 \sqrt{3}} \approx 0.537422$ ($d=3$) and $\frac{1}{2}+\frac{\log \left(2-\sqrt{3}\right)}{8 \sqrt{3}} \approx 0.404957$ ($d=4$). We obtain bound-entangled probabilities of $-\frac{4}{9}+\frac{4 π}{27 \sqrt{3}}+\frac{\log (3)}{6} \approx 0.00736862$ and $\frac{-204+7 \log (7)+168 \sqrt{3} \cos ^{-1}\left(\frac{11}{14}\right)}{1134} \approx 0.00325613$ ($d=3$) and $\frac{8 \log (2)}{27}-\frac{59}{288} \approx 0.00051583$ and $\frac{24 \text{csch}^{-1}\left(\frac{8}{\sqrt{17}}\right)}{17 \sqrt{17}}-\frac{91}{544} \approx 0.00218722$ ($d=4$). Thus, the total entanglement probability appears to equal $(1-\frac{8 π}{27 \sqrt{3}})+\frac{2}{81} \left(4 \sqrt{3} π-21\right) = \frac{13}{27} \approx 0.481481$.) The families, encompassing these results, are parameterized using generalized Choi and Jafarizadeh-Behzadi-Akbari witnesses. The same bound-entangled probability was achieved with both--the sets ("jagged islands") detected having void intersection. The entanglement (bound and "non-bound"/"free") probability for both was $\frac{1}{6} \approx 0.16667$, while their union and intersection gave $\frac{2}{9} \approx 0.22222$ and $\frac{1}{9} \approx 0.11111$. Further, we examine generalized Horodecki states, as well as estimating PPT-probabilities of approximately 0.39339 (very well-fitted by $\frac{7 π}{25 \sqrt{5}} \approx 0.39338962$) and 0.115732 ( for the original (8- [two-qutrit] and 15 [two-ququart]-dimensional) magic simplices themselves.

arXiv:1905.09228•Jan 1, 2019•4 citations

Quantum entanglement

Garay, Linda Bertel

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Simulating Entangling Unitary Operator Using Non-maximally Entangled States

Chun-Xian Li, Wang Cheng-Zhi, Nie Liu-Ying +1 more

We use non-maximally entangled states (NMESs) to simulate an entangling unitary operator (EUO) with a certain probability. Given entanglement resources, the probability of the success we achieve is a decreasing function of the parameters of the EUO. Given an EUO, for certain entanglement resources the result is optimal, i.e., the probability obtains a maximal value, and for optimal result higher parameters of the EUO match more amount of entanglement resources. The probability of the success we achieve is higher than the known results under some condition.

Chinese Physics Letters•Feb 1, 2009•0 citations

Quantum Entanglement

Liesel K. Hill

•Sep 13, 2013•0 citations
We report several witness-parameterized families of bound-entangled probabilities. Two pertain to the d=3d=3d=3 (two-qutrit) and a third to the d=4d=4d=4 (two-ququart) subsets analyzed by Hiesmayr and L{ö}ffler of "magic" simplices of Bell states. The Hilbert-Schmidt probabilities of positive-partial-transpose (PPT) states--within which we search for bound-entangled states--are 8π273≈0.537422\frac{8 π}{27 \sqrt{3}} \approx 0.537422273​8π​≈0.537422 (d=3d=3d=3) and 12+log⁡(2−3)83≈0.404957\frac{1}{2}+\frac{\log \left(2-\sqrt{3}\right)}{8 \sqrt{3}} \approx 0.40495721​+83​log(2−3​)​≈0.404957 (d=4d=4d=4). We obtain bound-entangled probabilities of −49+4π273+log⁡(3)6≈0.00736862-\frac{4}{9}+\frac{4 π}{27 \sqrt{3}}+\frac{\log (3)}{6} \approx 0.00736862−94​+273​4π​+6log(3)​≈0.00736862 and −204+7log⁡(7)+1683cos⁡−1(1114)1134≈0.00325613\frac{-204+7 \log (7)+168 \sqrt{3} \cos ^{-1}\left(\frac{11}{14}\right)}{1134} \approx 0.003256131134−204+7log(7)+1683​cos−1(1411​)​≈0.00325613 (d=3d=3d=3) and 8log⁡(2)27−59288≈0.00051583\frac{8 \log (2)}{27}-\frac{59}{288} \approx 0.00051583278log(2)​−28859​≈0.00051583 and 24csch−1(817)1717−91544≈0.00218722\frac{24 \text{csch}^{-1}\left(\frac{8}{\sqrt{17}}\right)}{17 \sqrt{17}}-\frac{91}{544} \approx 0.002187221717​24csch−1(17​8​)​−54491​≈0.00218722 (d=4d=4d=4). Thus, the total entanglement probability appears to equal (1−8π273)+281(43π−21)=1327≈0.481481(1-\frac{8 π}{27 \sqrt{3}})+\frac{2}{81} \left(4 \sqrt{3} π-21\right) = \frac{13}{27} \approx 0.481481(1−273​8π​)+812​(43​π−21)=2713​≈0.481481.) The families, encompassing these results, are parameterized using generalized Choi and Jafarizadeh-Behzadi-Akbari witnesses. The same bound-entangled probability was achieved with both--the sets ("jagged islands") detected having void intersection. The entanglement (bound and "non-bound"/"free") probability for both was 16≈0.16667\frac{1}{6} \approx 0.1666761​≈0.16667, while their union and intersection gave 29≈0.22222\frac{2}{9} \approx 0.2222292​≈0.22222 and 19≈0.11111\frac{1}{9} \approx 0.1111191​≈0.11111. Further, we examine generalized Horodecki states, as well as estimating PPT-probabilities of approximately 0.39339 (very well-fitted by 7π255≈0.39338962\frac{7 π}{25 \sqrt{5}} \approx 0.39338962255​7π​≈0.39338962) and 0.115732 ( for the original (8- [two-qutrit] and 15 [two-ququart]-dimensional) magic simplices themselves.
We use non-maximally entangled states (NMESs) to simulate an entangling unitary operator (EUO) with a certain probability. Given entanglement resources, the probability of the success we achieve is a decreasing function of the parameters of the EUO. Given an EUO, for certain entanglement resources the result is optimal, i.e., the probability obtains a maximal value, and for optimal result higher parameters of the EUO match more amount of entanglement resources. The probability of the success we achieve is higher than the known results under some condition.