Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1905.09228

Jagged Islands of Bound Entanglement and Witness-Parameterized Probabilities

Paul B. Slater

Published Jan 1, 2019• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We report several witness-parameterized families of bound-entangled probabilities. Two pertain to the $d=3$ (two-qutrit) and a third to the $d=4$ (two-ququart) subsets analyzed by Hiesmayr and L{ö}ffler of "magic" simplices of Bell states. The Hilbert-Schmidt probabilities of positive-partial-transpose (PPT) states--within which we search for bound-entangled states--are $\frac{8 π}{27 \sqrt{3}} \approx 0.537422$ ($d=3$) and $\frac{1}{2}+\frac{\log \left(2-\sqrt{3}\right)}{8 \sqrt{3}} \approx 0.404957$ ($d=4$). We obtain bound-entangled probabilities of $-\frac{4}{9}+\frac{4 π}{27 \sqrt{3}}+\frac{\log (3)}{6} \approx 0.00736862$ and $\frac{-204+7 \log (7)+168 \sqrt{3} \cos ^{-1}\left(\frac{11}{14}\right)}{1134} \approx 0.00325613$ ($d=3$) and $\frac{8 \log (2)}{27}-\frac{59}{288} \approx 0.00051583$ and $\frac{24 \text{csch}^{-1}\left(\frac{8}{\sqrt{17}}\right)}{17 \sqrt{17}}-\frac{91}{544} \approx 0.00218722$ ($d=4$). Thus, the total entanglement probability appears to equal $(1-\frac{8 π}{27 \sqrt{3}})+\frac{2}{81} \left(4 \sqrt{3} π-21\right) = \frac{13}{27} \approx 0.481481$.) The families, encompassing these results, are parameterized using generalized Choi and Jafarizadeh-Behzadi-Akbari witnesses. The same bound-entangled probability was achieved with both--the sets ("jagged islands") detected having void intersection. The entanglement (bound and "non-bound"/"free") probability for both was $\frac{1}{6} \approx 0.16667$, while their union and intersection gave $\frac{2}{9} \approx 0.22222$ and $\frac{1}{9} \approx 0.11111$. Further, we examine generalized Horodecki states, as well as estimating PPT-probabilities of approximately 0.39339 (very well-fitted by $\frac{7 π}{25 \sqrt{5}} \approx 0.39338962$) and 0.115732 ( for the original (8- [two-qutrit] and 15 [two-ququart]-dimensional) magic simplices themselves.

DOI
10.13140/rg.2.2.14246.06724

Related papers

Archipelagos of Total Bound and Free Entanglement

Paul B. Slater

First, we considerably simplify an initially quite complicated formula -- involving dilogarithms. It yields the total bound entanglement probability ($\approx 0.0865542$) for a qubit-ququart ($2 \times 4$) three-parameter model, recently analyzed for its separability properties by Li and Qiao. An "archipelago" of disjoint bound-entangled regions appears in the space of parameters, somewhat similarly to those recently found in our preprint, "Jagged Islands of Bound Entanglement and Witness-Parameterized Probabilities". There, two-qutrit and two-ququart Hiesmayr-L{ö}ffler "magic simplices" and generalized Horodecki states had been examined. However, contrastingly, in the present study, the entirety of bound entanglement--given by the formula obtained--is clearly captured in the archipelago found. Further, we "upgrade" the qubit-ququart model to a two-ququart one, for which we again find a bound-entangled archipelago, with its total probability simply being now $\frac{1}{729} \left(473-512 \log \left(\frac{27}{16}\right) \left(1+\log \left(\frac{27}{16}\right)\right)\right) \approx 0.0890496$. Then, "downgrading" the qubit-ququart model to a two-qubit one, we find an archipelago of total non-bound/free entanglement probability $\frac{1}{2}$.

arXiv:2001.01232•Jan 5, 2020•1 citation

8 Boolean Atoms Spanning the 256-Dimensional Entanglement-Probability Three-Set Algebra of the Two-Qutrit Hiesmayr-Loffler Magic Simplex of Bell States

Paul B. Slater

We obtain formulas (bot. p. 12)--including $\frac{2}{121}$ and $\frac{4 \left(242 \sqrt{3} π-1311\right)}{9801}$--for the eight atoms (Fig. 11), summing to 1, which span a 256-dimensional three-set (P, S, PPT) entanglement-probability boolean algebra for the two-qutrit Hiesmayr-Loffler states. PPT denotes positive partial transpose, while P and S provide the Li-Qiao necessary and}sufficient conditions for entanglement. The constraints ensuring entanglement are $s> \frac{16}{9} \approx 1.7777$ and $p> \frac{2^{27}}{3^{18} \cdot 7^{15} \cdot13} \approx 5.61324 \cdot 10^{-15}$. Here, $s$ is the square of the sum (Ky Fan norm) of the eight singular values of the $8 \times 8$ correlation matrix in the Bloch representation, and $p$, the square of the product of the singular values. In the two-ququart Hiesmayr-Loffler case, one constraint is $s>\frac{9}{4} \approx 2.25$, while $\frac{3^{24}}{2^{134}} \approx 1.2968528306 \cdot 10^{-29}$ is an upper bound on the appropriate $p$ value, with an entanglement probability $\approx 0.607698$. The $S$ constraints, in both cases, prove equivalent to the well-known CCNR/realignment criteria. Further, we detect and verify--using software of A. Mandilara--pseudo-one-copy undistillable (POCU) negative partial transposed two-qutrit states distributed over the surface of the separable states. Additionally, we study the best separable approximation problem within this two-qutrit setting, and obtain explicit decompositions of separable states into the sum of eleven product states. Numerous quantities of interest--including the eight atoms--were, first, estimated using a quasirandom procedure.

arXiv:2004.06745•Jan 1, 2020•1 citation

Li-Qiao Entanglement Constraints Confirming the Entanglement Probability of $\frac{13}{27}$ for the Two-Qutrit Hiesmayr-Löffler Magic Simplex of Bell States

Paul B. Slater

•Apr 14, 2020•0 citations

Geometric entanglement witnesses and bound entanglement

Reinhold A. Bertlmann, Philipp Krammer

We study entanglement witnesses that can be constructed with regard to the geometrical structure of the Hilbert-Schmidt space, i.e., we present how to use these witnesses in the context of quantifying entanglement and the detection of bound entangled states. We give examples for a particular three-parameter family of states that are part of the magic simplex of two-qutrit states.

arXiv:0710.1184•Physical Review A•Feb 21, 2008•68 citations

Qubit-qudit separability/PPT-probability investigations, including Lovas-Andai formula advancements

Paul B. Slater

We begin by advancing conjectures, closely fitting numerical estimates, for the Hilbert-Schmidt separability/PPT probabilities of the 35- and 63-dimensional convex sets of ($2 \times 3$) qubit-qutrit and ($2 \times 4$) qubit-qudit states, as well as certain related scenarios. We reason that the underlying volume formulas might closely parallel those now well-established--via a Lovas-Andai formula--in their lower (15)-dimensional two-qubit analogue. The qubit-qutrit conjecture we obtain is $(\frac{3}{10})^3 =\frac{3^3}{2^3 \cdot 5^3} = \frac{27}{1000} =0.027$, with the counterpart two-qubit separability probablity being $\frac{8}{33}=\frac{2^3}{3 \cdot 11} \approx 0.242424$. In the ($2 \times 4$) qubit-qudit case, we advance $\frac{16}{12375} =\frac{4^2}{3^2 \cdot 5^3 \cdot 11} \approx 0.001292929$ as the PPT-probability. The numerators of the probabilities for $2 \times m$ scenarios are, thus, possibly simply powers of $m$. We also search for the rebit-retrit counterpart to the established two-rebit result of $\frac{29}{64} =\frac{29}{2^6} \approx 0.453125$. Additionally, we find that the Hilbert-Schmidt separability/PPT-probabilities for the two-rebit, rebit-retrit and two-retrit $X$-states all equal $\frac{16}{3 \pi^2} \approx 0.54038$, as well as more generally, that the probabilities based on induced measures are equal across these three sets of $X$-states. Then, we extend the Lovas-Andai two-qubit framework from Hilbert-Schmidt measures to induced ones, raising the possibility of a still more general master formula.

•Mar 28, 2018•0 citations

Bound entanglement in the set of Bell-state mixtures of two qutrits

Reinhold A. Bertlmann, Philipp Krammer

We investigate the entanglement properties of a three-parameter family of states that are part of the magic simplex of two qutrits, which is a simplex of states that are mixtures of maximally entangled two-qutrit Bell states. Using entanglement witnesses, we reveal large regions of bound entangled and separable states.

arXiv:0804.1525•Physical Review A•Jul 15, 2008•52 citations
We report several witness-parameterized families of bound-entangled probabilities. Two pertain to the d=3d=3d=3 (two-qutrit) and a third to the d=4d=4d=4 (two-ququart) subsets analyzed by Hiesmayr and L{ö}ffler of "magic" simplices of Bell states. The Hilbert-Schmidt probabilities of positive-partial-transpose (PPT) states--within which we search for bound-entangled states--are 8π273≈0.537422\frac{8 π}{27 \sqrt{3}} \approx 0.537422273​8π​≈0.537422 (d=3d=3d=3) and 12+log⁡(2−3)83≈0.404957\frac{1}{2}+\frac{\log \left(2-\sqrt{3}\right)}{8 \sqrt{3}} \approx 0.40495721​+83​log(2−3​)​≈0.404957 (d=4d=4d=4). We obtain bound-entangled probabilities of −49+4π273+log⁡(3)6≈0.00736862-\frac{4}{9}+\frac{4 π}{27 \sqrt{3}}+\frac{\log (3)}{6} \approx 0.00736862−94​+273​4π​+6log(3)​≈0.00736862 and −204+7log⁡(7)+1683cos⁡−1(1114)1134≈0.00325613\frac{-204+7 \log (7)+168 \sqrt{3} \cos ^{-1}\left(\frac{11}{14}\right)}{1134} \approx 0.003256131134−204+7log(7)+1683​cos−1(1411​)​≈0.00325613 (d=3d=3d=3) and 8log⁡(2)27−59288≈0.00051583\frac{8 \log (2)}{27}-\frac{59}{288} \approx 0.00051583278log(2)​−28859​≈0.00051583 and 24csch−1(817)1717−91544≈0.00218722\frac{24 \text{csch}^{-1}\left(\frac{8}{\sqrt{17}}\right)}{17 \sqrt{17}}-\frac{91}{544} \approx 0.002187221717​24csch−1(17​8​)​−54491​≈0.00218722 (d=4d=4d=4). Thus, the total entanglement probability appears to equal (1−8π273)+281(43π−21)=1327≈0.481481(1-\frac{8 π}{27 \sqrt{3}})+\frac{2}{81} \left(4 \sqrt{3} π-21\right) = \frac{13}{27} \approx 0.481481(1−273​8π​)+812​(43​π−21)=2713​≈0.481481.) The families, encompassing these results, are parameterized using generalized Choi and Jafarizadeh-Behzadi-Akbari witnesses. The same bound-entangled probability was achieved with both--the sets ("jagged islands") detected having void intersection. The entanglement (bound and "non-bound"/"free") probability for both was 16≈0.16667\frac{1}{6} \approx 0.1666761​≈0.16667, while their union and intersection gave 29≈0.22222\frac{2}{9} \approx 0.2222292​≈0.22222 and 19≈0.11111\frac{1}{9} \approx 0.1111191​≈0.11111. Further, we examine generalized Horodecki states, as well as estimating PPT-probabilities of approximately 0.39339 (very well-fitted by 7π255≈0.39338962\frac{7 π}{25 \sqrt{5}} \approx 0.39338962255​7π​≈0.39338962) and 0.115732 ( for the original (8- [two-qutrit] and 15 [two-ququart]-dimensional) magic simplices themselves.
First, we considerably simplify an initially quite complicated formula -- involving dilogarithms. It yields the total bound entanglement probability (≈0.0865542\approx 0.0865542≈0.0865542) for a qubit-ququart (2×42 \times 42×4) three-parameter model, recently analyzed for its separability properties by Li and Qiao. An "archipelago" of disjoint bound-entangled regions appears in the space of parameters, somewhat similarly to those recently found in our preprint, "Jagged Islands of Bound Entanglement and Witness-Parameterized Probabilities". There, two-qutrit and two-ququart Hiesmayr-L{ö}ffler "magic simplices" and generalized Horodecki states had been examined. However, contrastingly, in the present study, the entirety of bound entanglement--given by the formula obtained--is clearly captured in the archipelago found. Further, we "upgrade" the qubit-ququart model to a two-ququart one, for which we again find a bound-entangled archipelago, with its total probability simply being now 1729(473−512log⁡(2716)(1+log⁡(2716)))≈0.0890496\frac{1}{729} \left(473-512 \log \left(\frac{27}{16}\right) \left(1+\log \left(\frac{27}{16}\right)\right)\right) \approx 0.08904967291​(473−512log(1627​)(1+log(1627​)))≈0.0890496. Then, "downgrading" the qubit-ququart model to a two-qubit one, we find an archipelago of total non-bound/free entanglement probability 12\frac{1}{2}21​.
We obtain formulas (bot. p. 12)--including 2121\frac{2}{121}1212​ and 4(2423π−1311)9801\frac{4 \left(242 \sqrt{3} π-1311\right)}{9801}98014(2423​π−1311)​--for the eight atoms (Fig. 11), summing to 1, which span a 256-dimensional three-set (P, S, PPT) entanglement-probability boolean algebra for the two-qutrit Hiesmayr-Loffler states. PPT denotes positive partial transpose, while P and S provide the Li-Qiao necessary and}sufficient conditions for entanglement. The constraints ensuring entanglement are s>169≈1.7777s> \frac{16}{9} \approx 1.7777s>916​≈1.7777 and p>227318⋅715⋅13≈5.61324⋅10−15p> \frac{2^{27}}{3^{18} \cdot 7^{15} \cdot13} \approx 5.61324 \cdot 10^{-15}p>318⋅715⋅13227​≈5.61324⋅10−15. Here, sss is the square of the sum (Ky Fan norm) of the eight singular values of the 8×88 \times 88×8 correlation matrix in the Bloch representation, and ppp, the square of the product of the singular values. In the two-ququart Hiesmayr-Loffler case, one constraint is s>94≈2.25s>\frac{9}{4} \approx 2.25s>49​≈2.25, while 3242134≈1.2968528306⋅10−29\frac{3^{24}}{2^{134}} \approx 1.2968528306 \cdot 10^{-29}2134324​≈1.2968528306⋅10−29 is an upper bound on the appropriate ppp value, with an entanglement probability ≈0.607698\approx 0.607698≈0.607698. The SSS constraints, in both cases, prove equivalent to the well-known CCNR/realignment criteria. Further, we detect and verify--using software of A. Mandilara--pseudo-one-copy undistillable (POCU) negative partial transposed two-qutrit states distributed over the surface of the separable states. Additionally, we study the best separable approximation problem within this two-qutrit setting, and obtain explicit decompositions of separable states into the sum of eleven product states. Numerous quantities of interest--including the eight atoms--were, first, estimated using a quasirandom procedure.
Li-Qiao Entanglement Constraints Confirming the Entanglement Probability of 1327\frac{13}{27}2713​ for the Two-Qutrit Hiesmayr-Löffler Magic Simplex of Bell States
We begin by advancing conjectures, closely fitting numerical estimates, for the Hilbert-Schmidt separability/PPT probabilities of the 35- and 63-dimensional convex sets of (2×32 \times 32×3) qubit-qutrit and (2×42 \times 42×4) qubit-qudit states, as well as certain related scenarios. We reason that the underlying volume formulas might closely parallel those now well-established--via a Lovas-Andai formula--in their lower (15)-dimensional two-qubit analogue. The qubit-qutrit conjecture we obtain is (310)3=3323⋅53=271000=0.027(\frac{3}{10})^3 =\frac{3^3}{2^3 \cdot 5^3} = \frac{27}{1000} =0.027(103​)3=23⋅5333​=100027​=0.027, with the counterpart two-qubit separability probablity being 833=233⋅11≈0.242424\frac{8}{33}=\frac{2^3}{3 \cdot 11} \approx 0.242424338​=3⋅1123​≈0.242424. In the (2×42 \times 42×4) qubit-qudit case, we advance 1612375=4232⋅53⋅11≈0.001292929\frac{16}{12375} =\frac{4^2}{3^2 \cdot 5^3 \cdot 11} \approx 0.0012929291237516​=32⋅53⋅1142​≈0.001292929 as the PPT-probability. The numerators of the probabilities for 2×m2 \times m2×m scenarios are, thus, possibly simply powers of mmm. We also search for the rebit-retrit counterpart to the established two-rebit result of 2964=2926≈0.453125\frac{29}{64} =\frac{29}{2^6} \approx 0.4531256429​=2629​≈0.453125. Additionally, we find that the Hilbert-Schmidt separability/PPT-probabilities for the two-rebit, rebit-retrit and two-retrit XXX-states all equal 163π2≈0.54038\frac{16}{3 \pi^2} \approx 0.540383π216​≈0.54038, as well as more generally, that the probabilities based on induced measures are equal across these three sets of XXX-states. Then, we extend the Lovas-Andai two-qubit framework from Hilbert-Schmidt measures to induced ones, raising the possibility of a still more general master formula.