The Principle of Least Action is used with a simple Lagrangian density, involving second-order derivatives of the wave function, to obtain the Schroedinger equation. A Hamiltonian density obtained from this simple Lagrangian density shows that Hamilton's equations also give the Schroedinger equation. This simple Lagrangian density is equivalent to a standard Lagrangian density with first-order derivatives. For a time-independent system the Principle of Least Action reduces to the energy variational principle. For time-dependent systems the Principle of Least Action gives time-dependent approximations. Using a Hartree product trial wave function for a time-dependent many-boson system, we apply the Principle of Least Action to obtain the Gross-Pitaevskii equation that describes a Bose-Einstein condensate.
The Principle of Least Action is used with a simple Lagrangian density, involving second-order derivatives of the wave function, to obtain the Schroedinger equation. A Hamiltonian density obtained from this simple Lagrangian density shows that Hamilton's equations also give the Schroedinger equation. This simple Lagrangian density is equivalent to a standard Lagrangian density with first-order derivatives. For a time-independent system the Principle of Least Action reduces to the energy variational principle. For time-dependent systems the Principle of Least Action gives time-dependent approximations. Using a Hartree product trial wave function for a time-dependent many-boson system, we apply the Principle of Least Action to obtain the Gross-Pitaevskii equation that describes a Bose-Einstein condensate.
Recent work shows that the Schroedinger equation can be solved exactly based only on classical least action. The computation is based on solving a HamiltonJacobi equation for the action computing the classical density accordingly along all stationary action paths and finally constructing the exact wave function based on these classical quantities alone. The method requires that the action Laplacian or more generally the Laplacian of the propagated density be purely time-varying along stationary action paths. In the case of arbitrary nonlinear potentials this condition can still be verified without loss of generality by using a time rescaling. As the complexity of the wave computation is thus shifted to that of the action and the possible time rescaling this paper proposes a new analytical approach both to compute the action itself for a general nonlinear Hamilton-Jacobi pde and to concurrently construct a time rescaling as needed In contrast to solving the Schroedinger equation directly this computation of action and density extends naturally to systems with nonlinear potentials or position dependent inertia tensors. Hence in principle it can replace the approximations of quantum perturbation theory. For general nonlinear potentials, extending a result of Duru and Kleinert the time rescaling in a given metric is shown to correspond to a change of variables in the computed action density and wave with each eigenwave computed using that change of variables. We show that the approach makes it straightforward to construct the quantum wave for basic cases where no exact solution has been yet derived with the time rescaling unifying the computation. The approach first illustrated for the known three dimensional hyperbolic potential waves of the hydrogen atom is then used to compute the quantum waves for a quartic oscillator for which so far no direct exact solutions are known.
The functionals of the Kohn and Sil variational principles of atomic collision theory contain second-order spatial derivatives of the wave-function. Ipso facto the "second-order" generalised Euler-Lagrange differential equation is a necessary condition for these functionals to yield a stationary value. To illustrate this we provide a classical prescription for the time-dependent and time-independent quantum potential scattering problems, generalising the latter to the three-body problem. As practical examples where the presence of second-order derivatives in the Lagrangian density makes a non-trivial contribution to the equations of motion, we consider the optimisation of translation factors in a trial wave-function using the Sil variational principle and the optimisation of a variable charge using the Kohn variational principle. As further examples of Lagrangian densities where second-order derivatives may occur we briefly mention electromagnetism and relativistic quantum mechanics.
It is shown how using the classical Hamilton-Jacobi equation one can arrive at the time-dependent wave equation. Although the former equation was originally used by E.Schroedinger to get the wave equation, we propose a different approach. In the first place, we do not use the principle of least action and, in addition, we arrive at the time-dependent equation, while Schroedinger (in his first seminal paper) used the least action principle and obtained the stationary wave equation. The proposed approach works for any classical Hamilton-Jacobi equation. In addition, by introducing information loss into the Hamilton-Jacobi equation we derive in an elementary fashion the wave equations (ranging from the Shroedinger to Klein-Gordon, to Dirac equations). We also apply this technique to a relativistic particle in the gravitational field and obtain the respective wave equation. All this supports 't Hooft's proposal about a possibility of arriving at quantum description from a classical continuum in the presence of information loss.
The Lagrangian could be written in terms of kinetic and potential energy, functions of coordinates and velocity and the amplitude of the fields at that point. The essential condition is that the Lagrangian assumed for the field, when studied with Lagrange’s equation, gives Maxwell’s equations as solution and leads to the same wave equation. There are many other fields of physics and many mechanical systems to which the Lagrangian approach can be applied. The goal of the present text is to introduce the beginner to the least action principle and the Lagrangian approach in an elementary way. The chapter argues that the Lagrangian chosen for the fields involved must be an expression that leads to those fields and equations. In wave mechanics, particle properties are described by a so-called wave representing the classical matter field ψ used in Schrodinger’s approach of wave mechanics.
Components of a field function are functions of coordinates and time and satisfy some definite differential equations, which are called field equations. Field equations can be given a very general variational or Lagrangian form, if one accepts, that a field as the dynamic system must be characterized by a definite Lagrangian function. For a mechanical system this function is written down as the sum over all the material points of the system. For a continuous system like a wave field, Lagrangian function is expressed by the space integral from Lagrangian function density: L(t) = ∫ Ld3x. (4.1) However, the variational principle deals not with the Lagrangian function but with an action S obtained from it by means of integration over x0 = ct S = c ∫ L(t)dt. (4.2) Therefore, noncovariant expression (4.1) in Lagrangian formalism is in fact intermediate and it is sufficient to consider the Lagrangian function density L, which depends on the four space-time coordinates x in an implicit way. Hereinafter, we shall simply call L by the Lagrangian. Analogously, the Hamiltonian function density H will be named the Hamiltonian. The Lagrangian depends on components of a field wavefunction ψk and on their first derivatives with respect to the space-time coordinates ∂ψk/∂x ν . In so doing we assign the meaning of generalized field coordinates to ψk, and the meaning of generalized field velocities to ∂ψk/∂x ν . The demand of lacking derivatives with respect to field functions above the first order in the Lagrangian is caused by the following reason. Dynamics of all known quantum fields is described either by equations of the first or the second order. On the one hand, these equations follow from the principle of a least action: δS = 0, (4.3) and under action variation the order of derivatives, entering L, is raised by one. The Lagrangian must be a relativistically covariant quantity, namely, a relativistic scalar L′(x′) = L(x). Thanks to the invariance under the space-time translations, we conclude that the Lagrangian must not manifestly contain any space-time coordinates x. Since dynamical observables (four-dimensional vector of the energy-momentum, the moment of momentum tensor, and so on) are real quantities, then the Lagrangian must be also a real quantity. We shall also impose the locality condition on the Lagrangian, that is, we assume that the Lagrangian depends only on the state of fields in the infinitely small vicinity of the point Particles, Fields, and Quantum x. So: L(x) = L(ψk, ∂ψk ∂xν ) = L (ψk(x), ψk;ν (x)) . General variation of an action, related with varying both field wave functions and of integration domain boundaries, is equal to: δS = δ ∫ L(x)dx = ∫ L(x′)dx′ − ∫ L(x)dx, (4.4) where dx = dx0dr. For L′(x′) we have the expression: L′(x′) = L (ψ′k(x′), ψ′k;ν(x′)) = L(x) + δL(x) = L(x) + δL(x) + dLdxλ δxλ, (4.5) In Eq. (4.5) we denote a form variation of corresponding quantities by the symbol δ. This way δL(x) represents varying the Lagrangian only on the account of the variation of field functions and field function derivatives: δL(x) = ∂L ∂ψk δψk + ∂L ∂ψk;ν δψk;ν , (4.6) and δψk(x) does a variation of a field function form: δψk(x) = ψ ′ k(x) − ψk(x).
In this paper we establish three variational principles that provide new foundations for Nelson’s stochastic mechanics in the case of nonrelativistic particles without spin. The resulting variational picture is much richer and of a different nature with respect to the one previously considered in the literature. We first develop two stochastic variational principles whose Hamilton–Jacobi-like equations are precisely the two coupled partial differential equations that are obtained from the Schrödinger equation (Madelung equations). The two problems are zero-sum, noncooperative, stochastic differential games that are familiar in the control theory literature. They are solved here by means of a new, absolutely elementary method based on Lagrange functionals. For both games the saddle-point equilibrium solution is given by the Nelson’s process and the optimal controls for the two competing players are precisely Nelson’s current velocity v and osmotic velocity u, respectively. The first variational principle includes as special cases both the Guerra–Morato variational principle [Phys. Rev. D 27, 1774 (1983)] and Schrödinger original variational derivation of the time-independent equation. It also reduces to the classical least action principle when the intensity of the underlying noise tends to zero. It appears as a saddle-point action principle. In the second variational principle the action is simply the difference between the initial and final configurational entropy. It is therefore a saddle-point entropy production principle. From the variational principles it follows, in particular, that both v(x,t) and u(x,t) are gradients of appropriate principal functions. In the variational principles, the role of the background noise has the intuitive meaning of attempting to contrast the more classical mechanical features of the system by trying to maximize the action in the first principle and by trying to increase the entropy in the second. Combining the two variational principles, we get the quantum Hamilton principle, i.e., a variational characterization of the logarithm of the wave function ψ. The Lagrangian is the Lagrangian of classical mechanics with the complex-valued velocity v−iu replacing the classical velocity. The dynamics is given by a stochastic differential equation for real-valued diffusions with complex-valued drift and driving noise processes. From the variational principle we derive a Newton-type law. We finally define the momentum process and show that its mean and variance coincide with those of the quantum momentum operator.