arXiv:0712.1008

Quantum Simulated Annealing

Somma, R., Boixo, S., Howard Barnum

Published Dec 6, 2007• 19 citations

Abstract

We develop a quantum algorithm to solve combinatorial optimization problems through quantum simulation of a classical annealing process. Our algorithm combines techniques from quantum walks, quantum phase estimation, and quantum Zeno effect. It can be viewed as a quantum analogue of the discrete-time Markov chain Monte Carlo implementation of classical simulated annealing. Our implementation scales with the inverse of the square root of the minimum spectral gap of the stochastic matrix used in the classical simulation. The quantum algorithm outperforms the classical one, which scales with the inverse of the gap.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0712.1008

Related papers

Quantum Simulations of Classical Annealing Processes

Rolando D. Somma, Sergio Boixo, Howard Barnum +1 more

We describe a quantum algorithm that solves combinatorial optimization problems by quantum simulation of a classical simulated annealing process. Our algorithm exploits quantum walks and the quantum Zeno effect induced by evolution randomization. It requires order 1/sqrt delta steps to find an optimal solution with bounded error probability, where delta is the minimum spectral gap of the stochastic matrices used in the classical annealing process. This is a quadratic improvement over the order 1/delta steps required by the latter.

arXiv:0804.1571Physical Review LettersSep 26, 2008170 citations

Quantum algorithms for simulated annealing

Sergio Boixo, Rolando D. Somma

This paper summarizes a quantum algorithm of [R.D. Somma, et.al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 130504 (2008)] that simulates a classical annealing process for solving discrete optimization problems. The complexity of the quantum algorithm scales with the inverse square root of the spectral gap of an associated stochastic matrix. This represents a quadratic quantum speedup, in terms of the gap, with respect to classical simulated annealing.

arXiv:1512.03806Dec 11, 20150 citations

Statistical Analysis of Quantum Annealing

Xinyu Song, Yazhen Wang, Shang Wu +1 more

Quantum computers use quantum resources to carry out computational tasks and may outperform classical computers in solving certain computational problems. Special-purpose quantum computers such as quantum annealers employ quantum adiabatic theorem to solve combinatorial optimization problems. In this paper, we compare classical annealings such as simulated annealing and quantum annealings that are done by the D-Wave machines both theoretically and numerically. We show that if the classical and quantum annealing are characterized by equivalent Ising models, then solving an optimization problem, i.e., finding the minimal energy of each Ising model, by the two annealing procedures, are mathematically identical. For quantum annealing, we also derive the probability lower-bound on successfully solving an optimization problem by measuring the system at the end of the annealing procedure. Moreover, we present the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to realize quantum annealing by classical computers and investigate its statistical properties. In the numerical section, we discuss the discrepancies between the MCMC based annealing approaches and the quantum annealing approach in solving optimization problems.

arXiv:2101.06854Jan 18, 20210 citations

Optimization through quantum annealing: theory and some applications

Demian A. Battaglia, Lorenzo Stella

Quantum annealing is a promising tool for solving optimization problems, similar in some ways to the traditional (classical) simulated annealing of Kirkpatrick et al. Simulated annealing takes advantage of thermal fluctuations in order to explore the optimization landscape of the problem at hand, whereas quantum annealing employs quantum fluctuations. Intriguingly, quantum annealing has been proved to be more effective than its classical counterpart in many applications. We illustrate the theory and the practical implementation of both classical and quantum annealing – highlighting the crucial differences between these two methods – by means of results recently obtained in experiments, in simple toy-models, and more challenging combinatorial optimization problems (namely, Random Ising model and Travelling Salesman Problem). The techniques used to implement quantum and classical annealing are either deterministic evolutions, for the simplest models, or Monte Carlo approaches, for harder optimization tasks. We discuss the pro and cons of these approaches and their possible connections to the landscape of the problem addressed.

Contemporary PhysicsJul 1, 20068 citations

Stochastic Simulated Quantum Annealing for Fast Solution of Combinatorial Optimization Problems

Naoya Onizawa, Ryoma Sasaki, Duckgyu Shin +2 more

Combinatorial optimization problems are frequently classified as NP-hard, which means that the time needed to find the optimal solution generally increases exponentially with the problem size. However, the existing research gap highlights the necessity to develop combinatorial optimization methods capable of scaling to large problems while maintaining low solution latency. In this paper, we introduce stochastic simulated quantum annealing (SSQA) for fast solution of combinatorial optimization problems. SSQA is designed based on stochastic computing, which can simulate quantum annealing (QA) by using multiple replicas of spins (probabilistic bits) in classical computing. The use of stochastic computing leads to an efficient parallel spin-state update algorithm, enabling quick search for a solution around the global minimum energy. Therefore, SSQA realizes quantum-like annealing for large-scale problems and can handle fully connected models in combinatorial optimization, unlike QA. The proposed method is evaluated in MATLAB on graph isomorphism problems, which are typical combinatorial optimization problems. It can handle a 100-times larger problem size compared to QA and a 25-times larger problem size compared to a traditional SA method, respectively, for similar convergence probabilities. The time to solution of SSQA is 11.5 times and 423 times smaller than that of the conventional stochastic simulated annealing method and traditional SA, respectively, when solving a 2,025-node combinatorial optimization problem.

arXiv:2302.12454IEEE AccessJan 1, 20248 citations

Quantum state preparation by phase randomization

Sergio Boixo, Emanuel H. Knill, Rolando D. Somma

A computation in adiabatic quantum computing is implemented by traversing a path of nondegenerate eigenstates of a continuous family of Hamiltonians. We introduce a method that traverses a discretized form of the path: At each step we apply the instantaneous Hamiltonian for a random time. The resulting decoherence approximates a projective measurement onto the desired eigenstate, achieving a version of the quantum Zeno effect. If negative evolution times can be implemented with constant overhead, then the average absolute evolution time required by our method is O(L^2/Delta) for constant error probability, where L is the length of the path of eigenstates and Delta is the minimum spectral gap of the Hamiltonian. Making explicit the dependence on the path length is useful for cases where L does not depend on Delta. The complexity of our method has a logarithmic improvement over previous algorithms of this type. The same cost applies to the discrete-time case, where a family of unitary operators is given and each unitary and its inverse can be used. Restriction to positive evolution times incurs an error that decreases exponentially with the cost. Applications of this method to unstructured search and quantum sampling are considered. In particular, we discuss the quantum simulated annealing algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems. This algorithm provides a quadratic speed-up in the gap of the stochastic matrix over its classical counterpart implemented via Markov chain Monte Carlo.

arXiv:0903.1652Mar 9, 20099 citations