Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0711.1325 · Physical Review B

Phase diagram of the dissipative quantum particle in a box

J. Sabio, L. Borda, F. Guinea, Fernando Sols

Published Aug 28, 2008• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We analyze the phase diagram of a quantum particle confined to a finite chain and subjected to a dissipative environment described by an ohmic spectral function. Analytical and numerical techniques are employed to explore both the perturbative and nonperturbative regimes of the model. For small dissipation of the coupling to the environment leads to a narrowing of the density distribution and to a displacement toward the center of the array of accessible sites. For large values of the dissipation, we find a phase transition to a doubly degenerate phase, which reflects the formation of an inhomogeneous effective potential within the array.

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.78.085439

Related papers

Dissipation-induced first-order decoherence phase transition in a noninteracting fermionic system

Mariya V. Medvedyeva, Mihailo Čubrović, Stefan K. Kehrein

We consider a quantum wire connected to the leads and subjected to dissipation along its length. The dissipation manifests as tunneling into (out of) the chain from (to) a memoryless environment. The evolution of the system is described by the Lindblad equation. Already infinitesimally small dissipation along the chain induces a quantum phase transition (QPT). This is a decoherence QPT: the reduced density matrix of a subsystem in the nonequilibrium steady state (far from the ends of the chain) can be represented as the tensor product of single-site density matrices. The QPT is identified from the jump of the current and the entropy per site as the dissipation becomes nonzero. We also explore the properties of the boundaries of the chain close to the transition point and observe that the boundaries behave as if they undergo a second-order phase transition as a function of the dissipation strength: the particle-particle correlation functions and the response to the electric field exhibit a power-law divergence. Disorder is known to localize one-dimensional systems, but the coupling to the memoryless environment pushes the system back into the delocalized state even in the presence of disorder. Interestingly, we observe a similar transition in the classical dissipative counterflow model: the current has a jump at the ends of the chain introducing an infinitely small dissipation.

arXiv:1409.1625•Physical Review B•May 13, 2015•8 citations

Quantum phase transition in a dissipative two-qubit system

Hang Zheng, Zhiguo Lü, Yang Zhao

By means of a unitary transformation, we study quantum phase transitions in the ground state of a two-qubit system interacting with a dissipative reservoir. First, the ground state phase diagram is analyzed in the presence of the Ohmic and sub-Ohmic bath using an analytic ground state wave function which takes into account the competition between intrasite tunneling and intersite correlation. The quantum critical point is determined as the transition point from non-degenerate to degenerate ground state and our calculated critical coupling strength $\alpha_c$ agrees with that from the numerical renormalization group method. Moreover, by computing the entanglement entropy between the qubits and the bath in the ground state, we explore the nature of the quantum phase transition between the delocalized and localized states.

arXiv:1407.2075•Jul 8, 2014•1 citation

Dissipation-induced quantum phase transition in a quantum box

L. Borda, Gergely Zaránd, Pascal Simon

In a recent work, Le Hur has shown, using perturbative arguments, that dissipative coupling to gate electrodes may play an important role in a quantum box near its degeneracy point [K. Le Hur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 196804 (2004)]: While quantum fluctuations of the charge of the dot tend to round Coulomb blockade charging steps of the box, strong enough dissipation suppresses these fluctuations and leads to the reappearance of sharp charging steps. In the present paper, we study this quantum phase transition in detail using bosonization and the numerical renormalization group in the limit of vanishing level spacing and map out the phase diagram using these nonperturbative methods. We also discuss the properties of the renormalized lead-dot conductance in the vicinity of the phase transition and determine the scaling properties of the dynamically generated crossover scale analytically.

arXiv:cond-mat/0412330•Physical Review B•Oct 17, 2005•26 citations

Ansatz for the quantum phase transition in a dissipative two-qubit system

Hang Zheng, Zhiguo Lü, Yang Zhao

By means of a unitary transformation, we propose an ansatz to study quantum phase transitions in the ground state of a two-qubit system interacting with a dissipative reservoir. First, the ground-state phase diagram is analyzed in the presence of the Ohmic and sub-Ohmic bath using an analytic ground-state wave function that takes into account the competition between intrasite tunneling and intersite correlation. The quantum critical point is determined as the transition point from a nondegenerate to a degenerate ground state, and our calculated critical coupling strength α(c) agrees with that from the numerical renormalization-group method. Moreover, by computing the entanglement entropy between the qubits and the bath as well as the qubit-qubit correlation function in the ground state, we explore the nature of the quantum phase transition between the delocalized and localized states.

Physical Review E•Jun 11, 2015•11 citations

Functional renormalization group study of a dissipative Bose-Hubbard model

Oscar Bouverot-Dupuis, Vincent Grison, Nicolas Paris

We investigate the phase diagram of a one-dimensional dissipative Bose-Hubbard model using the nonperturbative functional renormalization group (FRG). Each lattice site is coupled to an independent bath, generating long-range temporal interactions that encode non-Markovian dissipation. For a broad class of bath spectra - ohmic, sub-ohmic, and super-ohmic - we identify two competing low-energy regimes: a Luttinger-liquid line of fixed points and a dissipative fixed point characterized by finite compressibility, vanishing superfluid stiffness, and universal scaling exponents, separated by a Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition. The FRG framework is essential here, as it provides access to the complete renormalization group flow and all fixed points from a single microscopic action, beyond the reach of perturbative or variational methods. This work establishes a unified and systematically improvable framework for describing dissipative quantum phases in one dimension.

arXiv:2511.09643•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Apr 15, 2026•0 citations

Quantum dynamics of the dissipative two-state system coupled with a sub-Ohmic bath

Zhiguo Lü, Hang Zheng

The decoherence of a two-state system coupled with a sub-Ohmic bath is investigated theoretically by means of the perturbation approach based on a unitary transformation. It is shown that the decoherence depends strongly and sensitively on the structure of environment. Nonadiabatic effect is treated through the introduction of a function ${\ensuremath{\xi}}_{k}$ which depends on the boson frequency and renormalized tunneling. The results are as follows: (i) the nonequilibrium correlation function $P(t)$, the dynamical susceptibility ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{\ensuremath{''}}(\ensuremath{\omega})$, and the equilibrium correlation function $C(t)$ are analytically obtained for $s\ensuremath{\leqslant}1$; (ii) the phase diagram of thermodynamic transition shows the delocalized-localized transition point ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{l}$ which agrees with exact results and numerical data from the numerical renormalization group; (iii) the dynamical transition point ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}$ between coherent and incoherent phase is explicitly given. A crossover from the coherent oscillation to incoherent relaxation appears with increasing coupling (for $\ensuremath{\alpha}>{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}$, the coherent dynamics disappear); (iv) the Shiba's relation and sum rule are exactly satisfied when $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\leqslant}{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}$; (v) an underdamping-overdamping transition point ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{*}$ exists in the function $S(\ensuremath{\omega})$. Consequently, the dynamical phase diagrams in both ohmic and sub-Ohmic case are mapped out. For $\ensuremath{\Delta}⪡{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{c}$, the critical couplings (${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{l},{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}$, and ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{*}$) are proportional to ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}^{1\ensuremath{-}s}$.

arXiv:quant-ph/0612042•Physical Review B•Feb 2, 2007•77 citations
We analyze the phase diagram of a quantum particle confined to a finite chain and subjected to a dissipative environment described by an ohmic spectral function. Analytical and numerical techniques are employed to explore both the perturbative and nonperturbative regimes of the model. For small dissipation of the coupling to the environment leads to a narrowing of the density distribution and to a displacement toward the center of the array of accessible sites. For large values of the dissipation, we find a phase transition to a doubly degenerate phase, which reflects the formation of an inhomogeneous effective potential within the array.
We consider a quantum wire connected to the leads and subjected to dissipation along its length. The dissipation manifests as tunneling into (out of) the chain from (to) a memoryless environment. The evolution of the system is described by the Lindblad equation. Already infinitesimally small dissipation along the chain induces a quantum phase transition (QPT). This is a decoherence QPT: the reduced density matrix of a subsystem in the nonequilibrium steady state (far from the ends of the chain) can be represented as the tensor product of single-site density matrices. The QPT is identified from the jump of the current and the entropy per site as the dissipation becomes nonzero. We also explore the properties of the boundaries of the chain close to the transition point and observe that the boundaries behave as if they undergo a second-order phase transition as a function of the dissipation strength: the particle-particle correlation functions and the response to the electric field exhibit a power-law divergence. Disorder is known to localize one-dimensional systems, but the coupling to the memoryless environment pushes the system back into the delocalized state even in the presence of disorder. Interestingly, we observe a similar transition in the classical dissipative counterflow model: the current has a jump at the ends of the chain introducing an infinitely small dissipation.
By means of a unitary transformation, we study quantum phase transitions in the ground state of a two-qubit system interacting with a dissipative reservoir. First, the ground state phase diagram is analyzed in the presence of the Ohmic and sub-Ohmic bath using an analytic ground state wave function which takes into account the competition between intrasite tunneling and intersite correlation. The quantum critical point is determined as the transition point from non-degenerate to degenerate ground state and our calculated critical coupling strength αc\alpha_cαc​ agrees with that from the numerical renormalization group method. Moreover, by computing the entanglement entropy between the qubits and the bath in the ground state, we explore the nature of the quantum phase transition between the delocalized and localized states.
In a recent work, Le Hur has shown, using perturbative arguments, that dissipative coupling to gate electrodes may play an important role in a quantum box near its degeneracy point [K. Le Hur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 196804 (2004)]: While quantum fluctuations of the charge of the dot tend to round Coulomb blockade charging steps of the box, strong enough dissipation suppresses these fluctuations and leads to the reappearance of sharp charging steps. In the present paper, we study this quantum phase transition in detail using bosonization and the numerical renormalization group in the limit of vanishing level spacing and map out the phase diagram using these nonperturbative methods. We also discuss the properties of the renormalized lead-dot conductance in the vicinity of the phase transition and determine the scaling properties of the dynamically generated crossover scale analytically.
By means of a unitary transformation, we propose an ansatz to study quantum phase transitions in the ground state of a two-qubit system interacting with a dissipative reservoir. First, the ground-state phase diagram is analyzed in the presence of the Ohmic and sub-Ohmic bath using an analytic ground-state wave function that takes into account the competition between intrasite tunneling and intersite correlation. The quantum critical point is determined as the transition point from a nondegenerate to a degenerate ground state, and our calculated critical coupling strength α(c) agrees with that from the numerical renormalization-group method. Moreover, by computing the entanglement entropy between the qubits and the bath as well as the qubit-qubit correlation function in the ground state, we explore the nature of the quantum phase transition between the delocalized and localized states.
We investigate the phase diagram of a one-dimensional dissipative Bose-Hubbard model using the nonperturbative functional renormalization group (FRG). Each lattice site is coupled to an independent bath, generating long-range temporal interactions that encode non-Markovian dissipation. For a broad class of bath spectra - ohmic, sub-ohmic, and super-ohmic - we identify two competing low-energy regimes: a Luttinger-liquid line of fixed points and a dissipative fixed point characterized by finite compressibility, vanishing superfluid stiffness, and universal scaling exponents, separated by a Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition. The FRG framework is essential here, as it provides access to the complete renormalization group flow and all fixed points from a single microscopic action, beyond the reach of perturbative or variational methods. This work establishes a unified and systematically improvable framework for describing dissipative quantum phases in one dimension.
The decoherence of a two-state system coupled with a sub-Ohmic bath is investigated theoretically by means of the perturbation approach based on a unitary transformation. It is shown that the decoherence depends strongly and sensitively on the structure of environment. Nonadiabatic effect is treated through the introduction of a function ${\ensuremath{\xi}}_{k}$ which depends on the boson frequency and renormalized tunneling. The results are as follows: (i) the nonequilibrium correlation function P(t)P(t)P(t), the dynamical susceptibility ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{\ensuremath{''}}(\ensuremath{\omega})$, and the equilibrium correlation function C(t)C(t)C(t) are analytically obtained for $s\ensuremath{\leqslant}1$; (ii) the phase diagram of thermodynamic transition shows the delocalized-localized transition point ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{l}$ which agrees with exact results and numerical data from the numerical renormalization group; (iii) the dynamical transition point ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}$ between coherent and incoherent phase is explicitly given. A crossover from the coherent oscillation to incoherent relaxation appears with increasing coupling (for $\ensuremath{\alpha}>{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}$, the coherent dynamics disappear); (iv) the Shiba's relation and sum rule are exactly satisfied when $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\leqslant}{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}$; (v) an underdamping-overdamping transition point ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{*}$ exists in the function $S(\ensuremath{\omega})$. Consequently, the dynamical phase diagrams in both ohmic and sub-Ohmic case are mapped out. For $\ensuremath{\Delta}⪡{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{c}$, the critical couplings (${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{l},{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}$, and ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{*}$) are proportional to ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}^{1\ensuremath{-}s}$.