arXiv:0709.2637 · Physical Review Letters

Comment on “Berry Phase in a Composite System”

Han Li, Yong Guo

Published Apr 23, 2008• 3 citations

Abstract

We show in this comment that the results obtained in a recent work by Yi et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 150406 (2004)] are quantitatively not correct and the proposed subsystem Berry phase is not well-defined.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.100.168901

Related papers

Reply to 'comment on Berry phase in a composite system'

X. X. Yi, L. C. Wang, Tai-Yu Zheng

In this reply, we show that the adiabatic theorem would break down in the weak coupling limit, and the definition for the subsystem geometric phase is well defined.

arXiv:0709.4073Sep 26, 20070 citations

Eggert, Gustafsson, and Rommer Reply:

Sebastian Eggert, David Gustafsson, Stefan Rommer

In a comment by A.A. Zvyagin the phase diagram in our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 516 (2001)] was critisized of being incomplete and a new fixed point was suggested. We show that this point is in fact not a fixed point and that the phase diagram is correct as presented.

arXiv:cond-mat/0210001Physical Review LettersJul 12, 20012 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Remarks on the structure of states of composite quantum systems and envariance’ [Phys. Lett. A 355 (2006) 180]” [Phys. Lett. A 375 (2011) 1160]

Ph. Blanchard, Erwin Brüning

Physics Letters ADec 31, 20101 citation

On the calculation of the Berry phase in a solvable model

Wolfgang Bulla, P. Falkensteiner, Harald Grosse

Physics Letters BDec 1, 19883 citations

Comment on “Aharonov-Bohm Oscillations with Spin: Evidence for Berry’s Phase”

A. G. Mal’shukov, K. A. Chao

A Comment on the Letter by Jeng-Bang Yau, E. P. De Poortere, and M. Shayegan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 146801 (2002). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 21 May 2002DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.179701©2003 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersApr 30, 20037 citations

Comment on “Aharonov-Bohm Oscillations with Spin: Evidence for Berry’s Phase”

Apoorva G. Wagh, Veer Chand Rakhecha

A Comment on the Letter by Jeng-Bang Yau, E. P. De Poortere, and M. Shayegan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 146801 (2002). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 23 April 2002DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.119703©2003 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersMar 21, 20037 citations