Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0210001 · Physical Review Letters

Eggert, Gustafsson, and Rommer Reply:

Sebastian Eggert, David Gustafsson, Stefan Rommer

Published Jul 12, 2001• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In a comment by A.A. Zvyagin the phase diagram in our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 516 (2001)] was critisized of being incomplete and a new fixed point was suggested. We show that this point is in fact not a fixed point and that the phase diagram is correct as presented.
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.87.059702

Related papers

Eggert, Affleck, and Horton Reply:

Sebastian Eggert, Ian K. Affleck, Matthew D. P. Horton

A Reply to the Comment by A. A. Zvyagin.Received 2 October 2002DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.089702©2003 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Feb 25, 2003•4 citations

Stockman Replies:

Mark I. Stockman

A Reply to the Comment by Sebastian Wuestner et al.Received 5 June 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.259702© 2011 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Dec 13, 2011•5 citations

Comment on “Phase Diagram of an Impurity in the Spin-1 / 2 Chain: Two-Channel Kondo Effect versus Curie Law”

Andrei A. Zvyagin

A Comment on the Letter by Sebatian Eggert, David P. Gustafsson, and Stefan Rommer Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 516 (2001). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 18 January 2001DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.059701©2001 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Jul 12, 2001•6 citations

Faugeraset al.Reply:

C. Faugeras, Gérard Martinez, Yu. A. Bychkov

A Reply to the Comment by S. N. Klimin and J. T. Devreese.Received 13 August 2004DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.239702©2005 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Jun 15, 2005•4 citations

Reply to the "Comment on 'Neel order in doped quasi one-dimensional antiferromagnets'"

Sebastian Eggert, Ian K. Affleck, Matthew D. P. Horton

In a recent comment by A.A. Zvyagin to our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 47202 (2002)] it was pointed out that the bosonization treatment of the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg chain is only valid in the low temperature and long length limit. We support this statement and quantify the limits of validity by explicitly showing the crossover to the high temperature and/or short length limit using a combination of bosonization formulas and numerical results.

arXiv:cond-mat/0210002•Sep 30, 2002•0 citations

Henriksenet al.Reply:

Erik A. Henriksen, Paul Cadden-Zimansky, Zhigang Jiang +2 more

A Reply to the Comment by W. Zhu et al..Received 24 August 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.159704© 2010 The American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Oct 7, 2010•1 citation