Given a finite number of copies of an unknown qubit state that have already been measured optimally, can one still extract any information about the original unknown state? We give a positive answer to this question and quantify the information obtainable by a given observer as a function of the number of copies in the ensemble, and of the number of independent observers that, one after the other, have independently measured the same ensemble of qubits before him. The optimality of the protocol is proven and extensions to other states and encodings are also studied. According to the general lore, the state after a measurement has no information about the state before the measurement. Our results manifestly show that this statement has to be taken with a grain of salt, specially in situations where the quantum states encode confidential information.
Given a finite number of copies of an unknown qubit state that have already been measured optimally, can one still extract any information about the original unknown state? We give a positive answer to this question and quantify the information obtainable by a given observer as a function of the number of copies in the ensemble, and of the number of independent observers that, one after the other, have independently measured the same ensemble of qubits before him. The optimality of the protocol is proven and extensions to other states and encodings are also studied. According to the general lore, the state after a measurement has no information about the state before the measurement. Our results manifestly show that this statement has to be taken with a grain of salt, specially in situations where the quantum states encode confidential information.
Modern quantum physics now enables control of quantum systems at the level of individual trajectories, opening a new frontier that links quantum information theory, quantum many-body physics, and quantum thermodynamics, and uncovers novel non-equilibrium phenomena such as deep thermalization and measurement-induced entanglement. However, a central challenge remains: their characterization relies on measuring nonlinear properties of individual quantum states, a task tantamount to fine-grained cloning of a quantum ensemble. Here, the fundamental laws governing the cloning of quantum ensembles are investigated. First, a general no-cloning theorem for arbitrary ensembles is established from an information-theoretic perspective, even assuming multiple copies of the ensemble's purification. It is then shown that this barrier can be unexpectedly circumvented for physical ensembles generated by finite-time evolutions. Nevertheless, these tasks are proven to remain computationally intractable, even when the full circuit description of state preparation is known. This stands in sharp contrast to the conventional no-cloning theorem, which relies on the state being unknown. Together, these results establish new fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, reveal intrinsic trade-offs among sample complexity, computational complexity, and quantum measurements, and highlight the necessity of problem-specific strategies for probing measurement-induced quantum phenomena.
Given an unknown state of a qudit that has already been measured optimally, can one still extract any information about the original unknown state? Clearly, after a maximally informative measurement, the state of the system collapses into a postmeasurement state from which the same observer cannot obtain further information about the original state of the system. However, the system still encodes a significant amount of information about the original preparation for a second observer who is unaware of the actions of the first one. We study how a series of independent observers can obtain, or can scavenge, information about the unknown state of a system (quantified by the fidelity) when they sequentially measure it. We give closed-form expressions for the estimation fidelity when one or several qudits are available to carry information about the single-qudit state, and we study the classical limit when an arbitrarily large number of observers can obtain (nearly) complete information on the system. In addition to the case where all observers perform most informative measurements, we study the scenario where a finite number of observers estimates the state with equal fidelity, regardless of their position in the measurement sequence and the scenario where all observers use identical measurement apparatuses (up to a mutually unknown orientation) chosen so that a particular observer's estimation fidelity is maximized.
Shadow Tomography is a fundamental problem in quantum information theory. Given multiple copies of an unknown d-dimensional quantum state ρ and a known collection of observables E1,…,EM, the goal is to estimate all expectation values {Tr(ρEi)}i=1M to additive accuracy ε with probability at least 1−δ.
An elusive open question from the seminal shadow tomography work of Aaronson is whether this task admits a dimension-independent sample complexity with only polylogarithmic dependence on M, as suggested by the best-known lower bounds. In this work, we propose two different quantum protocols for shadow tomography with the best sample complexity O(ε2log(M)log(M/δ)), which is polylogarithmic in the number of observables and independent of the dimension of the unknown state, thereby answering Aaronson's original question while also providing an exponential improvement in the prior best dimension independent sample complexity of shadow tomography from Sinha (STOC 2025) and, more recently, Chen, O'Donnell, Pelecanos, and Wright.
Our approach first reduces the general shadow tomography problem to a finite-ensemble estimation problem via a minimax argument. We then develop an observable-independent protocol that repeatedly applies the pretty-good measurement while updating the prior distribution over the finite ensemble according to the measurement outcomes. A tail analysis of the resulting estimation error yields simultaneous accuracy guarantees for all observables and a cubic-logarithmic upper bound. We also introduce a refined recovery-label measurement for the same finite ensemble, which yields the bound in our main theorem.
It is shown that, despite strong nonlinearity, entanglement of formation of a two-qubit state can be measured without prior state reconstruction. Collective measurements on a small number of copies are provided that allow one to determine quantum concurrence via estimation of only four parameters. It is also pointed out that another entanglement measure based on so-called "negativity" can also be measured in a similar way. The result is related to the general problem: What kind of information can be extracted efficiently from an unknown quantum state?
We investigate quantum state discrimination with confidentiality. N observers share a given quantum state belonging to a finite set of known states. The observers want to determine the state as accurately as possible and send a discrimination result to a receiver. However, the observers are not allowed to get any information about which state was given. N−1 or fewer observers might try to steal the information, but if N observers coexist, the honest ones will keep the dishonest ones from doing anything wrong. Assume that the state set has a certain symmetry, or more precisely, is Abelian geometrically uniform; this letter describes the case of three linearly independent cyclic pure states as a special case. We propose a protocol that realizes any optimal inconclusive measurement, which is a generalized version of a minimum-error measurement and an optimal unambiguous measurement, for such a state set and ensures that any combined state of N−1 or fewer observers has absolutely no information about the given state. Our protocol provides a method of performing a quantum measurement securely, which could be useful in quantum information applications.
There is currently much interest in the recycling of entangled systems, for use in quantum information protocols by sequential observers. In this work, we study the sequential generation of Bell nonlocality via recycling one or both components of two-qubit states. We first give a description of two-valued qubit measurements in terms of measurement bias, strength, and reversibility, and derive useful tradeoff relations between them. Then, we derive one-sided monogamy relations for unbiased observables that strengthen the recent conjecture by Cheng et al. [Phys. Rev. A 104, L060201 (2021)] that if the first pair of observers violate Bell nonlocality then a subsequent independent pair cannot, and give semianalytic results for the best possible monogamy relation. We also extend the construction by Brown and Colbeck [Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 090401 (2020)] to obtain (i) a broader class of two-qubit states that allow the recycling of one qubit by a given number of observers on one side and (ii) a scheme for generating Bell nonlocality between arbitrarily many independent observers on each side, via the two-sided recycling of multiqubit states. Our results are based on a formalism that is applicable to more general problems in recycling entanglement and hence is expected to aid progress in this field.