Modern quantum physics now enables control of quantum systems at the level of individual trajectories, opening a new frontier that links quantum information theory, quantum many-body physics, and quantum thermodynamics, and uncovers novel non-equilibrium phenomena such as deep thermalization and measurement-induced entanglement. However, a central challenge remains: their characterization relies on measuring nonlinear properties of individual quantum states, a task tantamount to fine-grained cloning of a quantum ensemble. Here, the fundamental laws governing the cloning of quantum ensembles are investigated. First, a general no-cloning theorem for arbitrary ensembles is established from an information-theoretic perspective, even assuming multiple copies of the ensemble's purification. It is then shown that this barrier can be unexpectedly circumvented for physical ensembles generated by finite-time evolutions. Nevertheless, these tasks are proven to remain computationally intractable, even when the full circuit description of state preparation is known. This stands in sharp contrast to the conventional no-cloning theorem, which relies on the state being unknown. Together, these results establish new fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, reveal intrinsic trade-offs among sample complexity, computational complexity, and quantum measurements, and highlight the necessity of problem-specific strategies for probing measurement-induced quantum phenomena.
Modern quantum physics now enables control of quantum systems at the level of individual trajectories, opening a new frontier that links quantum information theory, quantum many-body physics, and quantum thermodynamics, and uncovers novel non-equilibrium phenomena such as deep thermalization and measurement-induced entanglement. However, a central challenge remains: their characterization relies on measuring nonlinear properties of individual quantum states, a task tantamount to fine-grained cloning of a quantum ensemble. Here, the fundamental laws governing the cloning of quantum ensembles are investigated. First, a general no-cloning theorem for arbitrary ensembles is established from an information-theoretic perspective, even assuming multiple copies of the ensemble's purification. It is then shown that this barrier can be unexpectedly circumvented for physical ensembles generated by finite-time evolutions. Nevertheless, these tasks are proven to remain computationally intractable, even when the full circuit description of state preparation is known. This stands in sharp contrast to the conventional no-cloning theorem, which relies on the state being unknown. Together, these results establish new fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, reveal intrinsic trade-offs among sample complexity, computational complexity, and quantum measurements, and highlight the necessity of problem-specific strategies for probing measurement-induced quantum phenomena.
Quantum theory fundamentally forbids the perfect copying of an arbitrary unknown quantum state, according to a principle known as the no-cloning theorem. Nevertheless, it is possible to construct a deterministic quantum map that produces multiple approximate copies of an unknown quantum state. This task is referred to as universal quantum cloning, further facilitating numerous quantum technologies such as quantum cryptography and quantum communication. In this work, we theoretically verify that the universal quantum cloning cannot be realized within a noncontextual theory, highlighting its intrinsically nonclassical nature. Our verification first {focuses on revealing that} 1→2 cloning scenario {is fully contextual}, and {further covers general examples to observe the contextual behavior of} N→M scenario. We believe that our results regarding quantum cloning serve a key role for understanding both quantum foundation and application.
The no-cloning theorem is a cornerstone result in quantum mechanics that forbids copying of general quantum information. More quantitatively, even given N copies of an unknown state, any channel producing an (N+1)-copy state incurs a nonzero trace-distance error on some inputs. Turning this around, one can ask about the sample complexity of approximate N→N+1 cloning: for a desired small error ε, what N suffices? For arbitrary pure states on a Hilbert space H, the answer is N≃dimH/ε - astronomically large for most H of interest. What if the input is promised to lie in a structured family? We examine a range of families fundamental to many-body physics and quantum information: n-mode fermionic Gaussian and Slater states, n-mode bosonic Gaussian states, and qudit phase states. For fermions, we construct optimal cloning channels, reducing the complexity from exponential to polynomial in n. For bosonic Gaussian states, we construct an explicit cloner that certifies polynomial complexity, without any constraint on the energy of the state; this channel, however, is not optimal in general. The fermionic and bosonic results follow from a single representation-theoretic framework, which generalizes previous work by Werner and by Chiribella and Yang; it also yields the cloners' unitary implementation. Furthermore, we explain why for many families the cloning complexity is linear in the dimension of the family manifold, via a controlled saddle-point evaluation of the frame potential at high N. The same calculation accounts for the analogous scaling of tomography complexity. The above framework does not cover phase states; for these we give an independent construction of a channel with optimal cloning fidelity. Our work complements recent results on cloning stabilizer states.
Out-of-equilibrium quantum many-body systems stand at the forefront of modern theoretical physics, addressing fundamental questions on thermalization, transport, and universal phenomena. These fields, already well established in condensed matter, statistical physics, quantum optics, and quantum information theory, are progressively gaining even greater relevance with the rapid development of quantum technologies and simulation, which inherently operate in dynamical regimes. In recent years, the traditional paradigm of unitary quantum evolution has been expanded to include measurements, opening new directions in out-of-equilibrium physics. At the core of these advances lie measurement-induced phase transitions (MIPTs), which have emerged as a new class of dynamical critical phenomena characterizing the general behavior of monitored quantum dynamics. When external monitoring intertwines with unitary evolution, many-body quantum correlations change their structure, giving rise to distinct entanglement phases of matter. This discovery has sparked enormous interest in MIPTs, leading to significant advances in open quantum systems, entanglement theory, and more broadly quantum complexity. Despite much progress, a full understanding of monitored many-body dynamics is far from complete, leaving several open questions on the nature of MIPTs, their experimental observability, and the possibilities offered by measurements to enhance control over synthetic quantum matter. These issues persist due to the intrinsic complexity of the problem and the lack of efficient tools to study it, mainly caused by the stochastic character of monitored evolution. This thesis addresses these challenges by expanding the investigation of measurement-induced phenomena in new settings and introducing innovative probes of entanglement and many-body quantum complexity for MIPTs. A core question we investigate is the role of symmetries, non-ergodicity, and especially integrability in measurement-induced criticality, which dramatically affect the non-equilibrium phases. We further explore how these phenomena extend beyond bipartite quantum correlations to multipartite entanglement and quantum non-stabilizerness, highlighting the non-trivial interplay between measurements and complexity notions rooted in quantum information theory. Finally, we focus on the compelling problem of decoherence, modeling how noise spoils entanglement structures. These findings, supported by advanced numerical simulations and theoretical analysis, deepen the current understanding of entanglement, complexity, and integrability in monitored quantum many-body systems, offering new perspectives on their rich behavior. In parallel, we address the experimental problem of dissipation in MIPTs, which is of key relevance for practical implementations. We anticipate the present investigation to foster future research on the nature of monitored dynamical critical phenomena and, more broadly, the applications of measurements in quantum state evolution.
Abstract In modern quantum information science, the no-cloning theorem constitutes a fundamental principle stating that it is impossible to create an exact copy of an arbitrary unknown quantum state. This intrinsic limitation forms the basis of quantum security mechanisms and gives rise to unique phenomena such as quantum teleportation and superdense coding, which enable the transmission of quantum information without physically transferring the quantum state itself. Within the broader framework of quantum computation, algorithms such as Grover's algorithm provide quadratic speedup for unstructured search problems, though they do not always achieve optimal query complexity for certain classes of tasks. In such scenarios, quantum random walks offer an alternative paradigm capable of further reducing query complexity and enhancing search efficiency. This study examines the theoretical foundations and practical implications of the no-cloning theorem, quantum teleportation, superdense coding, and quantum random walks in the context of information security. Special attention is given to their role in designing countermeasure systems against information theft, destruction, and modification. Practical demonstrations are conducted using Qiskit on IBM quantum hardware, highlighting the applied significance and future potential of these quantum security mechanisms.
The impossibility of simultaneously cloning non-orthogonal states lies at the foundations of quantum theory. Even when allowing for approximation errors, cloning an arbitrary unknown pure state requires as many initial copies as needed to fully learn the state. Rather than arbitrary unknown states, modern quantum learning theory often considers structured classes of states and exploits such structure to develop learning algorithms that outperform general-state tomography. This raises the question: How do the sample complexities of learning and cloning relate for such structured classes? We answer this question for an important class of states. Namely, for n-qubit stabilizer states, we show that the optimal sample complexity of cloning is Θ(n). Thus, also for this structured class of states, cloning is as hard as learning. To prove these results, we use representation-theoretic tools in the recently proposed Abelian State Hidden Subgroup framework and a new structured version of the recently introduced random purification channel to relate stabilizer state cloning to a variant of the sample amplification problem for probability distributions that was recently introduced in classical learning theory. This allows us to obtain our cloning lower bounds by proving new sample amplification lower bounds for classes of distributions with an underlying linear structure. Our results provide a more fine-grained perspective on No-Cloning theorems, opening up connections from foundations to quantum learning theory and quantum cryptography.
Abstract No-cloning theorem forbids perfect cloning of an unknown quantum state. A universal quantum cloning machine (UQCM), capable of producing two copies of any input qubit with the optimal fidelity, is of fundamental interest and has applications in quantum information processing. This is enabled by delicately tailored nonclassical correlations between the input qubit and the copying qubits, which distinguish the UQCM from a classical counterpart, but whose experimental demonstrations are still lacking. We here implement the UQCM in a superconducting circuit and investigate these correlations. The measured entanglements well agree with our theoretical prediction that they are independent of the input state and thus constitute a universal quantum behavior of the UQCM that was not previously revealed. Another feature of our experiment is the realization of deterministic and individual cloning, in contrast to previously demonstrated UQCMs, which either were probabilistic or did not constitute true cloning of individual qubits.