Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0705.4224

Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics versus Quantum Field Theories

Antonio Pineda A

Published May 29, 2007• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We briefly review the derivation of a non-relativistic quantum mechanics description of a weakly bound non-relativistic system from the underlying quantum field theory. We highlight the main techniques used.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0705.4224

Related papers

The borderland between quantum and classical mechanics

Willis E. Lamb

A derivation of non-relativistic quantum mechanics is based on classical Newtonian mechanics.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1997•3 citations

On the Absence of the Zeno Effect in Relativistic Quantum Field Theory

R. F. Álvarez-Estrada, José L. Sánchez-gómez

We study the time evolution of decaying particles in renormalizable models of Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Significant differences between the latter and Non Relativistic Quantum Mechanics are found —in particular, the Zeno effect seems to be absent in such RQFT models. Conventional renormalization yields finite time behaviour in some cases but fails to produce finite survival probabilities in others. The analysis of the finite time evolution in relativistic quantum field theory (RQFT) and, in particular, the behaviour at short times of the survival probability of unstable particles in RQFT is a relevant matter as far as the foundations of quantum mechanics are concerned and has some peculiarities which make it to be worth studying. But before going to RQFT, we will briefly recapitulate the main features of the survival amplitude (SA) at short times in non relativistic quantum mechanics (QM henceforth); see, for instance, [1] for a comprehensive review.

•Jan 1, 2008•7 citations

Rutherford Scattering: a comparison between Classical Mechanics, Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, and Quantum Field Theory

José Orlando Rodrigues da Cunha Filho, Lucas de Castro Rodrigues Barros

This is a review article that investigates the three approaches to Rutherford Scattering Theory - Classical Mechanics, Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, and Quantum Field Theory - and their distinctions. In the first sections, the mathematical models are demonstrated and a qualitative analysis of the main differences in each interpretation of the phenomenon is performed. Next, numerical simulations show the effects of dealing with relativistic or non-relativistic limits. The results make it clear that no theory is essentially wrong, but the newer ones are just more complete and consider more relevant parameters.

•Dec 21, 2021•0 citations

An Introduction to the Functional Formulation of Quantum Mechanics

H. O. Girotti

The functional formulation of quantum mechanics and relativistic quantum field theories are widely studied subjects. Nevertheless, certain aspects of this formulation are frequently overlooked, in spite of their relevance from a structural point of view. This book aims to fill up this gap. The non-relativistic regime has been found particularly appropriate for these purposes.

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jun 17, 2013•0 citations

Mathematical formulation of non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Valter Moretti

Unitext•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Obtaining the non-relativistic quantum mechanics from quantum field theory: issues, folklores and facts

Τ. Padmanabhan

Given the classical dynamics of a non-relativistic particle in terms of a Hamiltonian or an action, it is relatively straightforward to obtain the non-relativistic quantum mechanics (NRQM) of the system. These standard procedures, based on either the Hamiltonian or the path integral, however, do not work in the case of a relativistic particle. As a result we do not have a single-particle description of relativistic quantum mechanics (RQM). Instead, the correct approach requires a transmutation of dynamical variables from the position and momentum of a single particle to a field and its canonical momentum. Particles, along with antiparticles , reappear in a very nontrivial manner as the excitations of the field. The fact that one needs to adopt completely different languages to describe a relativistic and non-relativistic free particle implies that obtaining the NRQM limit of QFT is conceptually nontrivial. I examine this limit in several approaches (like, for e.g., Hamiltonian dynamics, Lagrangian and Hamiltonian path integrals, field theoretic description etc.) and identify the precise issues which arise when one attempts to obtain the NRQM from QFT in each of these approaches. The dichotomy of NRQM and QFT does not originate just from the square root in the Hamiltonian or from the demand of Lorentz invariance, as is sometimes claimed. The real difficulty has its origin in the necessary existence of antiparticles to ensure a particular notion of relativistic causality. Because of these conceptual issues, it turns out that one cannot , in fact, obtain some of the popular descriptions of NRQM by any sensible limiting procedure applied to QFT. To obtain NRQM from QFT in a seamless manner, it is necessary to work with NRQM expressed in a language closer to that of QFT. This fact has several implications, especially for the operational notion of space coordinates in quantum theory. A close examination of these issues, which arise when quantum theory is combined with special relativity, could offer insights in the context of attempts to combine quantum theory with general relativity.

arXiv:1712.06605•The European Physical Journal C•Jul 1, 2018•23 citations
We study the time evolution of decaying particles in renormalizable models of Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Significant differences between the latter and Non Relativistic Quantum Mechanics are found —in particular, the Zeno effect seems to be absent in such RQFT models. Conventional renormalization yields finite time behaviour in some cases but fails to produce finite survival probabilities in others. The analysis of the finite time evolution in relativistic quantum field theory (RQFT) and, in particular, the behaviour at short times of the survival probability of unstable particles in RQFT is a relevant matter as far as the foundations of quantum mechanics are concerned and has some peculiarities which make it to be worth studying. But before going to RQFT, we will briefly recapitulate the main features of the survival amplitude (SA) at short times in non relativistic quantum mechanics (QM henceforth); see, for instance, [1] for a comprehensive review.
This is a review article that investigates the three approaches to Rutherford Scattering Theory - Classical Mechanics, Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, and Quantum Field Theory - and their distinctions. In the first sections, the mathematical models are demonstrated and a qualitative analysis of the main differences in each interpretation of the phenomenon is performed. Next, numerical simulations show the effects of dealing with relativistic or non-relativistic limits. The results make it clear that no theory is essentially wrong, but the newer ones are just more complete and consider more relevant parameters.
Given the classical dynamics of a non-relativistic particle in terms of a Hamiltonian or an action, it is relatively straightforward to obtain the non-relativistic quantum mechanics (NRQM) of the system. These standard procedures, based on either the Hamiltonian or the path integral, however, do not work in the case of a relativistic particle. As a result we do not have a single-particle description of relativistic quantum mechanics (RQM). Instead, the correct approach requires a transmutation of dynamical variables from the position and momentum of a single particle to a field and its canonical momentum. Particles, along with antiparticles , reappear in a very nontrivial manner as the excitations of the field. The fact that one needs to adopt completely different languages to describe a relativistic and non-relativistic free particle implies that obtaining the NRQM limit of QFT is conceptually nontrivial. I examine this limit in several approaches (like, for e.g., Hamiltonian dynamics, Lagrangian and Hamiltonian path integrals, field theoretic description etc.) and identify the precise issues which arise when one attempts to obtain the NRQM from QFT in each of these approaches. The dichotomy of NRQM and QFT does not originate just from the square root in the Hamiltonian or from the demand of Lorentz invariance, as is sometimes claimed. The real difficulty has its origin in the necessary existence of antiparticles to ensure a particular notion of relativistic causality. Because of these conceptual issues, it turns out that one cannot , in fact, obtain some of the popular descriptions of NRQM by any sensible limiting procedure applied to QFT. To obtain NRQM from QFT in a seamless manner, it is necessary to work with NRQM expressed in a language closer to that of QFT. This fact has several implications, especially for the operational notion of space coordinates in quantum theory. A close examination of these issues, which arise when quantum theory is combined with special relativity, could offer insights in the context of attempts to combine quantum theory with general relativity.