Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0705.2877

Origin of which-way information and generalization of the Born rule

Bruno Galvan

Published May 21, 2007• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The possibility to recover the which-way information, for example in the two slit experiment, is based on a natural but implicit assumption about the position of a particle {\it before} a position measurement is performed on it. This assumption cannot be deduced from the standard postulates of quantum mechanics. In the present paper this assumption is made explicit and formally postulated as a new rule, the {\it quantum typicality rule}. This rule correlates the positions of the particles at two different times, thus defining their trajectories. Unexpectedly, this rule is also equivalent to the Born rule with regard to the explanation of the results of statistical experiments. For this reason it can be considered a generalization of the Born rule. The existence of the quantum typicality rule strongly suggests the possibility of a new trajectory-based formulation of quantum mechanics. According to this new formulation, a closed quantum system is represented as a {\it quantum process}, which corresponds to a canonical stochastic process in which the probability measure is replaced by the wave function and the usual frequentist interpretation of probability is replaced by the quantum typicality rule.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0705.2877

Related papers

Generalization of the Born rule

Bruno Galvan

An alternative formulation of quantum mechanics is proposed based on a principle that can be considered a generalization of the Born rule. The principle is composed of a mathematical expression and an associated interpretation, and establishes a correlation between the positions of a particle at two different times. Under reasonable conditions for the wave function, this correlation implies that the particles follow quasiclassical trajectories. It is also shown that the Born rule is equivalent to a particular case of the evolved principle. These features allow the principle to provide a unified explanation of the results of the statistical experiments and of the quasiclassical macroscopic evolution. There is a strong analogy between the quantum principle and a probabilistic principle which is necessary to derive empirical predictions from the mathematical formalism of probability theory. This principle is referred to by some authors as Cournot's principle, while other authors use the equivalent notion of typicality. In this paper probability theory and quantum mechanics are formulated in such a way as to explicitly include the two principles and to emphasize the very similar conceptual structure of the two theories.

arXiv:0806.4935•Physical Review A•Oct 30, 2008•7 citations

On the nature of the Born rule

Roland Riek

A physical experiment comprises along the time trajectory a start, a time evolution (duration), and an end, which is the measurement. In non relativistic quantum mechanics the start of the experiment is defined by the wave function at time 0 taking into account the starting conditions, the evolution is described by the wave function following the Schrödinger equation and the measurement by the Born rule. While the Schrödinger equation is deterministic, it is the Born rule that makes quantum mechanics statistical with all its consequences. The nature of the Born rule is thereby unknown albeit necessary since it produces the correct ensemble averaged measures of the experiment. Here, it is demonstrated that the origin of the Born rule is the projection from the quantum frame (i.e. wave description) to the classical mechanics frame (i.e. particle description) described by a Ehrenfest theorem-oriented Fourier transformation. The statistical averaging over many measurements is necessary in order to eliminate the unknown initial and end time coordinate of the experiment in reference to the beginning of the universe.

arXiv:1901.03663•Jan 8, 2019•2 citations

Derivation of the born rule from the unitarity of quantum evolution

Gordey B. Lesovik

In order to make the quantum mechanics a closed theory one has to derive the Born rule from the first principles, like the Schroedinger equation (SEq), rather than postulate it. The Born rule was in certain sense derived in several articles, e.g. in [1] and [2]. In this work some arguments of previous authors are simplified and made more “physical”. It is shown how to derive the Born rule using the conservation of quantum state norm (Ψ|Ψ) that is the unitary evolution property determined by the SEq. It is this property that makes the probability equal to the square of the amplitude modulus. Possible modification of the Born rule is briefly discussed in the case when the evolution of the system is described by a nonlinear Schroedinger equation. We also present arguments in the spirit of the Many-World Interpretation to explain the origin of probabilistic behavior. Simply speaking, the randomness appears as a result of representing the wave function by using a detector of discrete nature that is found only in one state at a time, out of two or more possible states.

arXiv:1411.6992•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2021•2 citations

The Born rule in Bohmian mechanics

T. G. Philbin

The predictions of quantum mechanics are probabilistic. Quantum probabilities are extracted using a postulate of the theory called the Born rule, the status of which is central to the problem of quantum mechanics. Efforts to justify the Born rule from other physical principles, and thus elucidate the measurement process, have involved lengthy statistical or information-theoretic arguments. Here we show that Bohm's deterministic formulation of quantum mechanics allows the Born rule for measurements on a single system to be derived, without any statistical assumptions. We solve a simple example where the creation of an ensemble of identical quantum states, together with position measurements on those states, are described by Bohm's quantum dynamics. The calculated measurement outcomes agree with the Born-rule probabilities, which are thus a consequence of deterministic evolution. Our results demonstrate that quantum probabilities can emerge from simple dynamical laws alone, and they support the view that there is no underlying indeterminism in quantum phenomena.

•Sep 28, 2014•0 citations

A simple proof of Born’s rule for statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics

Biswaranjan Dikshit

The Born’s rule to interpret the square of wave function as the probability to get a specific value in measurement has been accepted as a postulate in foundations of quantum mechanics. Although there have been so many attempts at deriving this rule theoretically using different approaches such as frequency operator approach, many-world theory, Bayesian probability and envariance, literature shows that arguments in each of these methods are circular. In view of absence of a convincing theoretical proof, recently some researchers have carried out experiments to validate the rule up-to maximum possible accuracy using multi-order interference (Sinha et al, Science, 329, 418 [2010]). But, a convincing analytical proof of Born’s rule will make us understand the basic process responsible for exact square dependency of probability on wave function. In this paper, by generalizing the method of calculating probability in common experience into quantum mechanics, we prove the Born’s rule for statistical interpretation of wave function.

•Jan 1, 2017•1 citation

The estimation of the mean value of copies of uncertain positions and its relation to the basic structure of quantum mechanics

Zinoviy M. Landsman, Tomer Shushi

Abstract In this short paper, we propose a new framework for obtaining basic aspects of quantum mechanics that originate from estimating the mean value of the position of a statistical system based on the generalized Bayes estimators. We show that while the first-order estimation leads to a classical system, the second-order estimation produces the time-independent Schrödinger equation. The Born rule describes the probabilistic nature of quantum particles, and Max Born postulated it independently from the Schrödinger equation. We show that under the proposed model, both the Schrödinger equation and the Born rule are captured organically; particularly, we show that the Born rule leads to the Schrödinger equation. Finally, we show how the proposed model deals with the transition from quantum mechanics into classical mechanics when dealing with macroscopic objects without external assumptions.

Foundations of Physics•Jun 1, 2025•0 citations
The possibility to recover the which-way information, for example in the two slit experiment, is based on a natural but implicit assumption about the position of a particle {\it before} a position measurement is performed on it. This assumption cannot be deduced from the standard postulates of quantum mechanics. In the present paper this assumption is made explicit and formally postulated as a new rule, the {\it quantum typicality rule}. This rule correlates the positions of the particles at two different times, thus defining their trajectories. Unexpectedly, this rule is also equivalent to the Born rule with regard to the explanation of the results of statistical experiments. For this reason it can be considered a generalization of the Born rule. The existence of the quantum typicality rule strongly suggests the possibility of a new trajectory-based formulation of quantum mechanics. According to this new formulation, a closed quantum system is represented as a {\it quantum process}, which corresponds to a canonical stochastic process in which the probability measure is replaced by the wave function and the usual frequentist interpretation of probability is replaced by the quantum typicality rule.
An alternative formulation of quantum mechanics is proposed based on a principle that can be considered a generalization of the Born rule. The principle is composed of a mathematical expression and an associated interpretation, and establishes a correlation between the positions of a particle at two different times. Under reasonable conditions for the wave function, this correlation implies that the particles follow quasiclassical trajectories. It is also shown that the Born rule is equivalent to a particular case of the evolved principle. These features allow the principle to provide a unified explanation of the results of the statistical experiments and of the quasiclassical macroscopic evolution. There is a strong analogy between the quantum principle and a probabilistic principle which is necessary to derive empirical predictions from the mathematical formalism of probability theory. This principle is referred to by some authors as Cournot's principle, while other authors use the equivalent notion of typicality. In this paper probability theory and quantum mechanics are formulated in such a way as to explicitly include the two principles and to emphasize the very similar conceptual structure of the two theories.
A physical experiment comprises along the time trajectory a start, a time evolution (duration), and an end, which is the measurement. In non relativistic quantum mechanics the start of the experiment is defined by the wave function at time 0 taking into account the starting conditions, the evolution is described by the wave function following the Schrödinger equation and the measurement by the Born rule. While the Schrödinger equation is deterministic, it is the Born rule that makes quantum mechanics statistical with all its consequences. The nature of the Born rule is thereby unknown albeit necessary since it produces the correct ensemble averaged measures of the experiment. Here, it is demonstrated that the origin of the Born rule is the projection from the quantum frame (i.e. wave description) to the classical mechanics frame (i.e. particle description) described by a Ehrenfest theorem-oriented Fourier transformation. The statistical averaging over many measurements is necessary in order to eliminate the unknown initial and end time coordinate of the experiment in reference to the beginning of the universe.
In order to make the quantum mechanics a closed theory one has to derive the Born rule from the first principles, like the Schroedinger equation (SEq), rather than postulate it. The Born rule was in certain sense derived in several articles, e.g. in [1] and [2]. In this work some arguments of previous authors are simplified and made more “physical”. It is shown how to derive the Born rule using the conservation of quantum state norm (Ψ|Ψ) that is the unitary evolution property determined by the SEq. It is this property that makes the probability equal to the square of the amplitude modulus. Possible modification of the Born rule is briefly discussed in the case when the evolution of the system is described by a nonlinear Schroedinger equation. We also present arguments in the spirit of the Many-World Interpretation to explain the origin of probabilistic behavior. Simply speaking, the randomness appears as a result of representing the wave function by using a detector of discrete nature that is found only in one state at a time, out of two or more possible states.
The predictions of quantum mechanics are probabilistic. Quantum probabilities are extracted using a postulate of the theory called the Born rule, the status of which is central to the problem of quantum mechanics. Efforts to justify the Born rule from other physical principles, and thus elucidate the measurement process, have involved lengthy statistical or information-theoretic arguments. Here we show that Bohm's deterministic formulation of quantum mechanics allows the Born rule for measurements on a single system to be derived, without any statistical assumptions. We solve a simple example where the creation of an ensemble of identical quantum states, together with position measurements on those states, are described by Bohm's quantum dynamics. The calculated measurement outcomes agree with the Born-rule probabilities, which are thus a consequence of deterministic evolution. Our results demonstrate that quantum probabilities can emerge from simple dynamical laws alone, and they support the view that there is no underlying indeterminism in quantum phenomena.
The Born’s rule to interpret the square of wave function as the probability to get a specific value in measurement has been accepted as a postulate in foundations of quantum mechanics. Although there have been so many attempts at deriving this rule theoretically using different approaches such as frequency operator approach, many-world theory, Bayesian probability and envariance, literature shows that arguments in each of these methods are circular. In view of absence of a convincing theoretical proof, recently some researchers have carried out experiments to validate the rule up-to maximum possible accuracy using multi-order interference (Sinha et al, Science, 329, 418 [2010]). But, a convincing analytical proof of Born’s rule will make us understand the basic process responsible for exact square dependency of probability on wave function. In this paper, by generalizing the method of calculating probability in common experience into quantum mechanics, we prove the Born’s rule for statistical interpretation of wave function.
Abstract In this short paper, we propose a new framework for obtaining basic aspects of quantum mechanics that originate from estimating the mean value of the position of a statistical system based on the generalized Bayes estimators. We show that while the first-order estimation leads to a classical system, the second-order estimation produces the time-independent Schrödinger equation. The Born rule describes the probabilistic nature of quantum particles, and Max Born postulated it independently from the Schrödinger equation. We show that under the proposed model, both the Schrödinger equation and the Born rule are captured organically; particularly, we show that the Born rule leads to the Schrödinger equation. Finally, we show how the proposed model deals with the transition from quantum mechanics into classical mechanics when dealing with macroscopic objects without external assumptions.