Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0705.2742 · Foundations of Physics

A Toy Model for Quantum Mechanics

S. J. van Enk

Published Aug 14, 2007• 22 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-007-9171-3

Related papers

Toy quantum mechanics with hidden variables

Pavel Vyacheslavovich Kurakin, Георгий Геннадьевич Малинецкий

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

A q-deformed quantum mechanical toy model

Johannes Schwenk, J. Wess

Physics Letters B•Sep 1, 1992•112 citations

State and Process Tomography : In Spekkens' Toy Model

Andreas J. Andersson

In 2004 Robert W. Spekkens introduced a toy theory designed to make a case for the epistemic view of quantum mechanics. But how does Spekkens’ toy model differ from quantum theory? While some differences are well-established, we attempt to approach this question from a tomographic point of view. More specifically, we provide experimentally viableprocedureswhichenablesustocompletelycharacterizethestatesandgatesthatare available in the toy model. We show that, in contrast to quantum theory, decompositions of transformations in the toy model must be done in a non-linear fashion.

•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

The way to quantum mechanics

三男 武谷, 正幸 長崎

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

Toy quantum mechanics using hidden variables

Pavel Vyacheslavovich Kurakin, George G. Malinetskii

An original model of toy quantum mechanics that uses hidden variables but does not violate the well‐known Bell theorem is proposed.

Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society•Jan 1, 2004•3 citations

An Alternative View of Quantum Mechanics

G. Cvijanovich

Physics Essays•Jun 1, 1994•0 citations
In 2004 Robert W. Spekkens introduced a toy theory designed to make a case for the epistemic view of quantum mechanics. But how does Spekkens’ toy model differ from quantum theory? While some differences are well-established, we attempt to approach this question from a tomographic point of view. More specifically, we provide experimentally viableprocedureswhichenablesustocompletelycharacterizethestatesandgatesthatare available in the toy model. We show that, in contrast to quantum theory, decompositions of transformations in the toy model must be done in a non-linear fashion.