Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

The way to quantum mechanics

三男 武谷, 正幸 長崎

Published Jan 1, 2001• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

The Road to Quantum Mechanics

Alberto G. Rojo, Anthony M. Bloch

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 20, 2018•0 citations

Relativistic SUSY QM as Deformed SUSY QM

M. Arık, T. Rador, R. M. Mir‐Kasimov

The relativistic finite-difference SUSY Quantum Mechanics (QM) is developed. We show that it is connected in a natural way with the q-deformed SUSY Quantum Mechanics. Simple examples are given.

arXiv:hep-th/9509082•Sep 14, 1995•0 citations

On Quantum Mechanics

G. Feild

•Oct 15, 2018•0 citations

On a Gap in the Derivation of the Bell Nonlocality

Jiří Souček

Abstract. In this note we shall show that the proof of the nonlocality of Quantum Mechanics given in [1] contains a gap. We also show that Bell inequalities cannot be derived in the modified QM. In the paper [1] there is a proof of the nonlocality of Quantum Mechanics (QM). In the proof of this statement the main step is the following implication: “from EPR correlations to the predetermination”. This means the following: “A deterministic hidden variable theory was one’s only hope, if one wanted to explain the predicted quantum correlations in a local way. ” ([1]. Page 2) – i.e. the nonlocality or the pre-determination. “The important thing was instead that the only way to explain the perfect correlations locally is to attribute outcome-determining properties to the individual particles. These properties, evidently, would vary randomly from one particle pair to the next, but would be fixed (in an appropriately correlated way) once and for all at the source for a given particle pair. ” ([1], page 2). This may be called the pre-determination. “ … such deterministic hidden variables are the only way to account locally for the

•Aug 1, 2015•0 citations

A new approach to quantum mechanics

Yakir Aharonov

Journal of Lasers Optics & Photonics•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Does Quantum Mechanics Have Nonlinear Terms?

Barbara Goss Levi

One hears about testing quantum electrodynamics or relativity theory, but the theoretical basis of quantum mechanics is rarely questioned. Nevertheless, Steven Weinberg (University of Texas) has recently called for high-precision tests of quantum mechanics that are independent of any particular quantum mechanical theory. To pave the way for an examination of quantum mechanics, he has suggested one possible way of generalizing quantum mechanics to make it nonlinear. As Eugene Wigner pointed out in a 1939 paper, the linearity of quantum mechanics is an important assumption and one that may not necessarily always prove true. Weinberg stressed to us that he does not really feel that quantum mechanics is in any immediate danger, but he does believe that we can learn by questioning it: If we find that quantum mechanics cannot be generalized any further, we may come to understand better why it works so well. If we find that the theory can be generalized in a plausible way, then we must ask why ordinary quantum mechanics is so nearly valid—and we may discover some hidden physics in the process.

Physics Today•Oct 1, 1989•2 citations
Abstract. In this note we shall show that the proof of the nonlocality of Quantum Mechanics given in [1] contains a gap. We also show that Bell inequalities cannot be derived in the modified QM. In the paper [1] there is a proof of the nonlocality of Quantum Mechanics (QM). In the proof of this statement the main step is the following implication: “from EPR correlations to the predetermination”. This means the following: “A deterministic hidden variable theory was one’s only hope, if one wanted to explain the predicted quantum correlations in a local way. ” ([1]. Page 2) – i.e. the nonlocality or the pre-determination. “The important thing was instead that the only way to explain the perfect correlations locally is to attribute outcome-determining properties to the individual particles. These properties, evidently, would vary randomly from one particle pair to the next, but would be fixed (in an appropriately correlated way) once and for all at the source for a given particle pair. ” ([1], page 2). This may be called the pre-determination. “ … such deterministic hidden variables are the only way to account locally for the
One hears about testing quantum electrodynamics or relativity theory, but the theoretical basis of quantum mechanics is rarely questioned. Nevertheless, Steven Weinberg (University of Texas) has recently called for high-precision tests of quantum mechanics that are independent of any particular quantum mechanical theory. To pave the way for an examination of quantum mechanics, he has suggested one possible way of generalizing quantum mechanics to make it nonlinear. As Eugene Wigner pointed out in a 1939 paper, the linearity of quantum mechanics is an important assumption and one that may not necessarily always prove true. Weinberg stressed to us that he does not really feel that quantum mechanics is in any immediate danger, but he does believe that we can learn by questioning it: If we find that quantum mechanics cannot be generalized any further, we may come to understand better why it works so well. If we find that the theory can be generalized in a plausible way, then we must ask why ordinary quantum mechanics is so nearly valid—and we may discover some hidden physics in the process.