Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0704.1736 · Theoretical Computer Science

Parallelizing quantum circuits

Anne Broadbent, Elham Kashefi

Published Jan 7, 2009• 115 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.tcs.2008.12.046

Related papers

Parallelization of quantum circuits with ancillae

Hideaki Abe, Shao Chin Sung

IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems•Feb 1, 2003•0 citations

Classical Simulation of Quantum Circuits: Parallel Environments and Benchmark

Xiao-Yang Liu, Zeliang Zhang

neural information processing systems•Jan 1, 2023•1 citation

Decoherence Suppression by parallelization of quantum circuits

Roy Kallol, R. Srikanth, Srinivas Talabattula

•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

Some Notes on Parallel Quantum Computation

Cristopher Moore, Martin Nilsson

We exhibit some simple gadgets useful in designing shallow parallel circuits for quantum algorithms. We prove that any quantum circuit composed entirely of controlled-not gates or of diagonal gates can be parallelized to logarithmic depth, while circuits composed of both cannot. Finally, while we note the Quantum Fourier Transform can be parallelized to linear depth, we exhibit a simple quantum circuit related to it that we believe cannot be parallelized to less than linear depth, and therefore might be used to prove that QNC < QP.

arXiv:quant-ph/9804034•Apr 14, 1998•3 citations

Parallel classical simulation of noisy shallow circuits: no quantum advantage in 1D

Robert Koenig, Marco Tomamichel

We consider quantum circuits consisting of $d$ layers of nearest-neighbor two-qubit gates acting on $n$ qubits arranged on a line, where every qubit is independently depolarized with a constant probability before each layer. We describe a randomized parallel algorithm which samples from the output distribution of any such circuit to within total variation error $δ$, with parallel runtime $2^{O(d)}\log\log(n/δ)$ and $n 2^{O(d)}$ elementary real-arithmetic operations. Without noise, the same approach gives an exact sampler with parallel runtime $O(\log n)$. For constant depth, we further show that the input/output behavior of the noisy quantum circuit is reproduced up to a constant error by a randomized $\mathsf{AC}^0$-circuit, that is, a Boolean circuit of polynomial size and constant depth with unbounded fan-in AND and OR gates and NOT gates. Consequently, every relation problem solved by a noisy constant-depth quantum circuit in one dimension is also solved, with essentially the same success probability, by a randomized $\mathsf{AC}^0$-circuit. This rules out, for noisy circuits in one dimension, the unconditional quantum advantage established for noisy shallow circuits in two and three dimensions, where polynomial-size classical circuits over the same gate set require depth $Ω(\log n/\log\log n)$. Our algorithm exploits the fact that depolarizing noise cuts a one-dimensional circuit into independent pieces of logarithmic width, each of which can be sampled exactly in parallel.

quant-pharXiv:2609.39448•Oct 1, 2026•0 citations

Computing with Quantum Circuits

Daniele Cuomo

Springer theses•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations
We exhibit some simple gadgets useful in designing shallow parallel circuits for quantum algorithms. We prove that any quantum circuit composed entirely of controlled-not gates or of diagonal gates can be parallelized to logarithmic depth, while circuits composed of both cannot. Finally, while we note the Quantum Fourier Transform can be parallelized to linear depth, we exhibit a simple quantum circuit related to it that we believe cannot be parallelized to less than linear depth, and therefore might be used to prove that QNC < QP.
We consider quantum circuits consisting of ddd layers of nearest-neighbor two-qubit gates acting on nnn qubits arranged on a line, where every qubit is independently depolarized with a constant probability before each layer. We describe a randomized parallel algorithm which samples from the output distribution of any such circuit to within total variation error δδδ, with parallel runtime 2O(d)log⁡log⁡(n/δ)2^{O(d)}\log\log(n/δ)2O(d)loglog(n/δ) and n2O(d)n 2^{O(d)}n2O(d) elementary real-arithmetic operations. Without noise, the same approach gives an exact sampler with parallel runtime O(log⁡n)O(\log n)O(logn). For constant depth, we further show that the input/output behavior of the noisy quantum circuit is reproduced up to a constant error by a randomized AC0\mathsf{AC}^0AC0-circuit, that is, a Boolean circuit of polynomial size and constant depth with unbounded fan-in AND and OR gates and NOT gates. Consequently, every relation problem solved by a noisy constant-depth quantum circuit in one dimension is also solved, with essentially the same success probability, by a randomized AC0\mathsf{AC}^0AC0-circuit. This rules out, for noisy circuits in one dimension, the unconditional quantum advantage established for noisy shallow circuits in two and three dimensions, where polynomial-size classical circuits over the same gate set require depth Ω(log⁡n/log⁡log⁡n)Ω(\log n/\log\log n)Ω(logn/loglogn). Our algorithm exploits the fact that depolarizing noise cuts a one-dimensional circuit into independent pieces of logarithmic width, each of which can be sampled exactly in parallel.