Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9804034

Some Notes on Parallel Quantum Computation

Cristopher Moore, Martin Nilsson

Published Apr 14, 1998• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We exhibit some simple gadgets useful in designing shallow parallel circuits for quantum algorithms. We prove that any quantum circuit composed entirely of controlled-not gates or of diagonal gates can be parallelized to logarithmic depth, while circuits composed of both cannot. Finally, while we note the Quantum Fourier Transform can be parallelized to linear depth, we exhibit a simple quantum circuit related to it that we believe cannot be parallelized to less than linear depth, and therefore might be used to prove that QNC < QP.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9804034

Related papers

Parallel Quantum Computation and Quantum Codes

Cristopher Moore, Martin Nilsson

We study the class QNC of efficient parallel quantum circuits, the quantum analog of NC. We exhibit several useful gadgets and prove that various classes of circuits can be parallelized to logarithmic depth, including circuits for encoding and decoding standard quantum error-correcting codes, or, more generally, any circuit consisting of controlled-not gates, controlled $\pi$-shifts, and Hadamard gates. Finally, while we note the exact quantum Fourier transform can be parallelized to linear depth, we conjecture that neither itnor a simpler "staircase" circuit can be parallelized to less than this.

SIAM Journal on Computing•Jan 1, 2001•172 citations

Parallel Quantum Computation and Quantum Codes

Cristopher Moore, Martin Nilsson

We propose a definition of QNC, the quantum analog of the efficient parallel class NC. We exhibit several useful gadgets and prove that various classes of circuits can be parallelized to logarithmic depth, including circuits for encoding and decoding standard quantum error-correcting codes, or more generally any circuit consisting of controlled-not gates, controlled pi-shifts, and Hadamard gates. Finally, while we note the Quantum Fourier Transform can be parallelized to linear depth, we conjecture that an even simpler `staircase' circuit cannot be parallelized to less than linear depth, and might be used to prove that QNC < QP.

arXiv:quant-ph/9808027•Aug 17, 1998•16 citations

Performing the Quantum Fourier Transform in Linear Parallel Time

Cristopher Moore

We exhibit a quantum circuit that performs the Quantum Fourier Transform on $n$ qubits in $ (n)$ depth. Thus, a parallel quantum computer can carry out the QFT in linear time. We conjecture that this can, in fact, be reduced to $ ({\rm log} n)$ depth, which would place the QFT in the class {\bf QNC} of problems solvable in logarithmic parallel time.

•Jan 1, 1998•0 citations

Parallel quantum computing: from theory to practice

Einar Pius

The term quantum parallelism is commonly used to refer to a property of quantum computations where an algorithm can act simultaneously on a superposition of states. However, this is not the only aspect of parallelism in quantum computing. Analogously to the classical computing model, every algorithm consists of elementary quantum operations and the application of them could be parallelised itself. This kind of parallelism is explored in this thesis in the one way quantum computing (1WQC) and the quantum circuit model. In the quantum circuit model we explore arithmetic circuits and circuit complexity theory. Two new arithmetic circuits for quantum computers are introduced in this work: an adder and a multiply-adder. The latter is especially interesting because its depth (i.e. the number of parallel steps required to finish the computation) is smaller than for any known classical circuit when applied sequentially. From the complexity theoretical perspective we concentrate on the classes QAC0 and QAC0[2], the quantum counterparts of AC0 and AC0[2]. The class AC0 comprises of constant depth circuits with unbounded fan-in AND and OR gates and AC0[2] is obtained when unbounded fan-in parity gates are added to AC0 circuits. We prove that QAC0 circuits with two layers of multi-qubit gates cannot compute parity exactly. This is a step towards proving QAC0 6= QAC0[2], a relation known to hold for AC0 and AC0[2]. In 1WQC, computation is done through measurements on an entangled state called the resource state. Two well known parallelisation methods exist in this model: signal shifting and finding the maximally delayed general flow. The first one uses the measurement calculus formalism to rewrite the dependencies of an existing computation, whereas the second technique exploits the geometry of the resource state to find the optimal ordering of measurements. We prove that the aforementioned methods result in same depth computations when the input and output sizes are equal. Through showing this equivalence we reveal new properties of 1WQC computations and design a new algorithm for the above mentioned parallelisations.

•Jul 1, 2015•1 citation

On the need for large Quantum depth

Nai-Hui Chia, Kai-Min Chung, Ching–Yi Lai

Near-term quantum computers are likely to have small depths due to short coherence time and noisy gates. A natural approach to leverage these quantum computers is interleaving them with classical computers. Understanding the capabilities and limits of this hybrid approach is an essential topic in quantum computation. Most notably, the quantum Fourier transform can be implemented by a hybrid of logarithmic-depth quantum circuits and a classical polynomial-time algorithm. Therefore, it seems possible that quantum polylogarithmic depth is as powerful as quantum polynomial depth in the presence of classical computation.

ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•Jun 7, 2020•20 citations

On the Need for Large Quantum Depth

Nai-Hui Chia, Kai-Min Chung, Ching–Yi Lai

Near-term quantum computers are likely to have small depths due to short coherence time and noisy gates. A natural approach to leverage these quantum computers is interleaving them with classical computers. Understanding the capabilities and limits of this hybrid approach is an essential topic in quantum computation. Most notably, the quantum Fourier transform can be implemented by a hybrid of logarithmic-depth quantum circuits and a classical polynomial-time algorithm. Therefore, it seems possible that quantum polylogarithmic depth is as powerful as quantum polynomial depth in the presence of classical computation. Indeed, Jozsa conjectured that “ Any quantum polynomial-time algorithm can be implemented with only O (log n ) quantum depth interspersed with polynomial-time classical computations. ” This can be formalized as asserting the equivalence of BQP and “ BQNC BPP .” However, Aaronson conjectured that “ there exists an oracle separation between BQP and BPP BQNC . ” BQNC BPP and BPP BQNC are two natural and seemingly incomparable ways of hybrid classical-quantum computation. In this work, we manage to prove Aaronson’s conjecture and in the meantime prove that Jozsa’s conjecture, relative to an oracle, is false. In fact, we prove a stronger statement that for any depth parameter d , there exists an oracle that separates quantum depth d and 2 d +1 in the presence of classical computation. Thus, our results show that relative to oracles, doubling the quantum circuit depth does make the hybrid model more powerful, and this cannot be traded by classical computation.

arXiv:1909.10303•Journal of the ACM•Nov 23, 2022•11 citations
We exhibit some simple gadgets useful in designing shallow parallel circuits for quantum algorithms. We prove that any quantum circuit composed entirely of controlled-not gates or of diagonal gates can be parallelized to logarithmic depth, while circuits composed of both cannot. Finally, while we note the Quantum Fourier Transform can be parallelized to linear depth, we exhibit a simple quantum circuit related to it that we believe cannot be parallelized to less than linear depth, and therefore might be used to prove that QNC < QP.
We study the class QNC of efficient parallel quantum circuits, the quantum analog of NC. We exhibit several useful gadgets and prove that various classes of circuits can be parallelized to logarithmic depth, including circuits for encoding and decoding standard quantum error-correcting codes, or, more generally, any circuit consisting of controlled-not gates, controlled π\piπ-shifts, and Hadamard gates. Finally, while we note the exact quantum Fourier transform can be parallelized to linear depth, we conjecture that neither itnor a simpler "staircase" circuit can be parallelized to less than this.
We propose a definition of QNC, the quantum analog of the efficient parallel class NC. We exhibit several useful gadgets and prove that various classes of circuits can be parallelized to logarithmic depth, including circuits for encoding and decoding standard quantum error-correcting codes, or more generally any circuit consisting of controlled-not gates, controlled pi-shifts, and Hadamard gates. Finally, while we note the Quantum Fourier Transform can be parallelized to linear depth, we conjecture that an even simpler `staircase' circuit cannot be parallelized to less than linear depth, and might be used to prove that QNC < QP.
We exhibit a quantum circuit that performs the Quantum Fourier Transform on nnn qubits in $ (n)$ depth. Thus, a parallel quantum computer can carry out the QFT in linear time. We conjecture that this can, in fact, be reduced to $ ({\rm log} n)$ depth, which would place the QFT in the class {\bf QNC} of problems solvable in logarithmic parallel time.
The term quantum parallelism is commonly used to refer to a property of quantum computations where an algorithm can act simultaneously on a superposition of states. However, this is not the only aspect of parallelism in quantum computing. Analogously to the classical computing model, every algorithm consists of elementary quantum operations and the application of them could be parallelised itself. This kind of parallelism is explored in this thesis in the one way quantum computing (1WQC) and the quantum circuit model. In the quantum circuit model we explore arithmetic circuits and circuit complexity theory. Two new arithmetic circuits for quantum computers are introduced in this work: an adder and a multiply-adder. The latter is especially interesting because its depth (i.e. the number of parallel steps required to finish the computation) is smaller than for any known classical circuit when applied sequentially. From the complexity theoretical perspective we concentrate on the classes QAC0 and QAC0[2], the quantum counterparts of AC0 and AC0[2]. The class AC0 comprises of constant depth circuits with unbounded fan-in AND and OR gates and AC0[2] is obtained when unbounded fan-in parity gates are added to AC0 circuits. We prove that QAC0 circuits with two layers of multi-qubit gates cannot compute parity exactly. This is a step towards proving QAC0 6= QAC0[2], a relation known to hold for AC0 and AC0[2]. In 1WQC, computation is done through measurements on an entangled state called the resource state. Two well known parallelisation methods exist in this model: signal shifting and finding the maximally delayed general flow. The first one uses the measurement calculus formalism to rewrite the dependencies of an existing computation, whereas the second technique exploits the geometry of the resource state to find the optimal ordering of measurements. We prove that the aforementioned methods result in same depth computations when the input and output sizes are equal. Through showing this equivalence we reveal new properties of 1WQC computations and design a new algorithm for the above mentioned parallelisations.
Near-term quantum computers are likely to have small depths due to short coherence time and noisy gates. A natural approach to leverage these quantum computers is interleaving them with classical computers. Understanding the capabilities and limits of this hybrid approach is an essential topic in quantum computation. Most notably, the quantum Fourier transform can be implemented by a hybrid of logarithmic-depth quantum circuits and a classical polynomial-time algorithm. Therefore, it seems possible that quantum polylogarithmic depth is as powerful as quantum polynomial depth in the presence of classical computation.
Near-term quantum computers are likely to have small depths due to short coherence time and noisy gates. A natural approach to leverage these quantum computers is interleaving them with classical computers. Understanding the capabilities and limits of this hybrid approach is an essential topic in quantum computation. Most notably, the quantum Fourier transform can be implemented by a hybrid of logarithmic-depth quantum circuits and a classical polynomial-time algorithm. Therefore, it seems possible that quantum polylogarithmic depth is as powerful as quantum polynomial depth in the presence of classical computation. Indeed, Jozsa conjectured that “ Any quantum polynomial-time algorithm can be implemented with only O (log n ) quantum depth interspersed with polynomial-time classical computations. ” This can be formalized as asserting the equivalence of BQP and “ BQNC BPP .” However, Aaronson conjectured that “ there exists an oracle separation between BQP and BPP BQNC . ” BQNC BPP and BPP BQNC are two natural and seemingly incomparable ways of hybrid classical-quantum computation. In this work, we manage to prove Aaronson’s conjecture and in the meantime prove that Jozsa’s conjecture, relative to an oracle, is false. In fact, we prove a stronger statement that for any depth parameter d , there exists an oracle that separates quantum depth d and 2 d +1 in the presence of classical computation. Thus, our results show that relative to oracles, doubling the quantum circuit depth does make the hybrid model more powerful, and this cannot be traded by classical computation.