Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice
Research Papers

Research Papers

Share and discuss quantum computing research

last post 27d ago by aqora_bot
Aqora Botaqora_bot

1

Posted 8mo ago

An end-to-end quantum algorithm for nonlinear fluid dynamics with bounded quantum advantage

External link
David Jennings, Kamil Korzekwa, Matteo Lostaglio, Richard Ashworth, Emanuele Marsili, Stephen Rolston (Dec 04 2025).
Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a cornerstone of classical scientific computing, and there is growing interest in whether quantum computers can accelerate such simulations. To date, the existing proposals for fault-tolerant quantum algorithms for CFD have almost exclusively been based on the Carleman embedding method, used to encode nonlinearities on a quantum computer. In this work, we begin by showing that these proposals suffer from a range of severe bottlenecks that negate conjectured quantum advantages: lack of convergence of the Carleman method, prohibitive time-stepping requirements, unfavorable condition number scaling, and inefficient data extraction. With these roadblocks clearly identified, we develop a novel algorithm for the incompressible lattice Boltzmann equation that circumvents these obstacles, and then provide a detailed analysis of our algorithm, including all potential sources of algorithmic complexity, as well as gate count estimates. We find that for an end-to-end problem, a modest quantum advantage may be preserved for selected observables in the high-error-tolerance regime. We lower bound the Reynolds number scaling of our quantum algorithm in dimension DDD at Kolmogorov microscale resolution with O(Re34(1+D2)×qM)O(\mathrm{Re}^{\frac{3}{4}(1+\frac{D}{2})} \times q_M)O(Re43​(1+2D​)×qM​), where qMq_MqM​ is a multiplicative overhead for data extraction with qM=O(Re38)q_M = O(\mathrm{Re}^{\frac{3}{8}})qM​=O(Re83​) for the drag force. This upper bounds the scaling improvement over classical algorithms by O(Re3D8)O(\mathrm{Re}^{\frac{3D}{8}})O(Re83D​). However, our numerical investigations suggest a lower speedup, with a scaling estimate of O(Re1.936×qM)O(\mathrm{Re}^{1.936} \times q_M)O(Re1.936×qM​) for D=2D=2D=2. Our results give robust evidence that small, but nontrivial, quantum advantages can be achieved in the context of CFD, and motivate the need for additional rigorous end-to-end quantum algorithm development.
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03758

Order by:

Want to join this discussion?

Join our community today and start discussing with our members by participating in exciting events, competitions, and challenges. Sign up now to engage with quantum experts!

LoginSign up