Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice
Research Papers

Research Papers

Share and discuss quantum computing research

last post 27d ago by aqora_bot
Aqora Botaqora_bot

1

Posted 9mo ago

The debiased Keyl's algorithm: a new unbiased estimator for full state tomography

External link
Angelos Pelecanos, Jack Spilecki, John Wright (Oct 10 2025).
Abstract: In the problem of quantum state tomography, one is given nnn copies of an unknown rank-rrr mixed state ρ∈Cd×d\rho \in \mathbb{C}^{d \times d}ρ∈Cd×d and asked to produce an estimator of ρ\rhoρ. In this work, we present the debiased Keyl's algorithm, the first estimator for full state tomography which is both unbiased and sample-optimal. We derive an explicit formula for the second moment of our estimator, with which we show the following applications. (1) We give a new proof that n=O(rd/ε2)n = O(rd/\varepsilon^2)n=O(rd/ε2) copies are sufficient to learn a rank-rrr mixed state to trace distance error ε\varepsilonε, which is optimal. (2) We further show that n=O(rd/ε2)n = O(rd/\varepsilon^2)n=O(rd/ε2) copies are sufficient to learn to error ε\varepsilonε in the more challenging Bures distance, which is also optimal. (3) We consider full state tomography when one is only allowed to measure kkk copies at once. We show that n=O(max⁡(d3kε2,d2ε2))n =O\left(\max \left(\frac{d^3}{\sqrt{k}\varepsilon^2}, \frac{d^2}{\varepsilon^2} \right) \right)n=O(max(k​ε2d3​,ε2d2​)) copies suffice to learn in trace distance. This improves on the prior work of Chen et al. and matches their lower bound. (4) For shadow tomography, we show that O(log⁡(m)/ε2)O(\log(m)/\varepsilon^2)O(log(m)/ε2) copies are sufficient to learn mmm given observables O1,…,OmO_1, \dots, O_mO1​,…,Om​ in the "high accuracy regime", when ε=O(1/d)\varepsilon = O(1/d)ε=O(1/d), improving on a result of Chen et al. More generally, we show that if tr(Oi2)≤F\mathrm{tr}(O_i^2) \leq Ftr(Oi2​)≤F for all iii, then n=O(log⁡(m)⋅(min⁡{rFε,F2/3ε4/3}+1ε2))n = O\Big(\log(m) \cdot \Big(\min\Big\{\frac{\sqrt{r F}}{\varepsilon}, \frac{F^{2/3}}{\varepsilon^{4/3}}\Big\} + \frac{1}{\varepsilon^2}\Big)\Big)n=O(log(m)⋅(min{εrF​​,ε4/3F2/3​}+ε21​)) copies suffice, improving on existing work. (5) For quantum metrology, we give a locally unbiased algorithm whose mean squared error matrix is upper bounded by twice the inverse of the quantum Fisher information matrix in the asymptotic limit of large nnn, which is optimal.
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07788

Order by:

Want to join this discussion?

Join our community today and start discussing with our members by participating in exciting events, competitions, and challenges. Sign up now to engage with quantum experts!

LoginSign up