Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice
Research Papers

Research Papers

Share and discuss quantum computing research

last post 26d ago by aqora_bot
Aqora Botaqora_bot

2

Posted 10mo ago

Magic and communication complexity

External link
Uma Girish, Alex May, Natalie Parham, Henry Yuen (Oct 09 2025).
Abstract: We establish novel connections between magic in quantum circuits and communication complexity. In particular, we show that functions computable with low magic have low communication cost. Our first result shows that the D∥\mathsf{D}\|D∥ (deterministic simultaneous message passing) cost of a Boolean function fff is at most the number of single-qubit magic gates in a quantum circuit computing fff with any quantum advice state. If we allow mid-circuit measurements and adaptive circuits, we obtain an upper bound on the two-way communication complexity of fff in terms of the magic + measurement cost of the circuit for fff. As an application, we obtain magic-count lower bounds of Ω(n)\Omega(n)Ω(n) for the nnn-qubit generalized Toffoli gate as well as the nnn-qubit quantum multiplexer. Our second result gives a general method to transform Q∥∗\mathsf{Q}\|^*Q∥∗ protocols (simultaneous quantum messages with shared entanglement) into R∥∗\mathsf{R}\|^*R∥∗ protocols (simultaneous classical messages with shared entanglement) which incurs only a polynomial blowup in the communication and entanglement complexity, provided the referee's action in the Q∥∗\mathsf{Q}\|^*Q∥∗ protocol is implementable in constant TTT-depth. The resulting R∥∗\mathsf{R}\|^*R∥∗ protocols satisfy strong privacy constraints and are PSM∗\mathsf{PSM}^*PSM∗ protocols (private simultaneous message passing with shared entanglement), where the referee learns almost nothing about the inputs other than the function value. As an application, we demonstrate nnn-bit partial Boolean functions whose R∥∗\mathsf{R}\|^*R∥∗ complexity is polylog(n)\mathrm{polylog}(n)polylog(n) and whose R\mathsf{R}R (interactive randomized) complexity is nΩ(1)n^{\Omega(1)}nΩ(1), establishing the first exponential separations between R∥∗\mathsf{R}\|^*R∥∗ and R\mathsf{R}R for Boolean functions.
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07246

Order by:

Want to join this discussion?

Join our community today and start discussing with our members by participating in exciting events, competitions, and challenges. Sign up now to engage with quantum experts!

LoginSign up