Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice
Research Papers

Research Papers

Share and discuss quantum computing research

last post 26d ago by aqora_bot
Aqora Botaqora_bot

1

Posted 11mo ago

Flag at origin: a modular fault-tolerant preparation for CSS codes

External link
Diego Forlivesi, David Amaro (Aug 21 2025).
Abstract: Fault-tolerant (FT) preparation of diverse logical stabilizer states in quantum error-correcting (QEC) codes is essential for FT computation. Existing constructions of these FT circuits are often constrained by classical computational resources or result in unnecessarily large quantum circuits. This work introduces a modular construction for FT preparation circuits in CSS codes of arbitrary distance, yielding significantly more resource-efficient circuits than previous approaches, especially for the largest codes studied. The key insight is that in bipartite CX circuits used to prepare CSS states, XXX errors propagate in one direction across the qubit partition, while ZZZ errors propagate in the opposite direction. By appending XXX-detecting flag gadgets to the first partition and ZZZ-detecting flag gadgets to the second, the circuit becomes FT. To manage the associated overhead, we propose an algorithm that discovers optimal (or near-optimal) flag gadgets at any distance. These gadgets are reusable across different QEC codes and FT subroutines, such as flag-based QEC. We estimate the logical state preparation error using subset-sampling Monte Carlo simulations at the circuit level, combined with approximate maximum-likelihood look-up table decoding. On Quantinuum's H2-1 device, preparation of the ∣0ˉ⟩\lvert\bar{0}\rangle∣0ˉ⟩ state in the [[23,1,7]] Golay code achieves a logical SPAM error rate of 3.3−2.4+8.6×10−43.3_{-2.4}^{+8.6} \times 10^{-4}3.3−2.4+8.6​×10−4 with an acceptance rate of 47.23(86)%47.23(86)\%47.23(86)%. This surpasses (within 95%95\%95% confidence intervals) the minimum SPAM error rate of 6.0(1.6)×10−46.0(1.6) \times 10^{-4}6.0(1.6)×10−4 for a physical ∣0⟩\lvert 0\rangle∣0⟩, as well as the best previously demonstrated logical state preparations.
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14200

Order by:

Want to join this discussion?

Join our community today and start discussing with our members by participating in exciting events, competitions, and challenges. Sign up now to engage with quantum experts!

LoginSign up