Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice
Research Papers

Research Papers

Share and discuss quantum computing research

last post 26d ago by aqora_bot
Aqora Botaqora_bot

1

Posted last yr.

Instance-Optimal Quantum State Certification with Entangled Measurements

External link
Ryan O'Donnell, Chirag Wadhwa (Jul 09 2025).
Abstract: We consider the task of quantum state certification: given a description of a hypothesis state σ\sigmaσ and multiple copies of an unknown state ρ\rhoρ, a tester aims to determine whether the two states are equal or ϵ\epsilonϵ-far in trace distance. It is known that Θ(d/ϵ2)\Theta(d/\epsilon^2)Θ(d/ϵ2) copies of ρ\rhoρ are necessary and sufficient for this task, assuming the tester can make entangled measurements over all copies [CHW07,OW15,BOW19]. However, these bounds are for a worst-case σ\sigmaσ, and it is not known what the optimal copy complexity is for this problem on an instance-by-instance basis. While such instance-optimal bounds have previously been shown for quantum state certification when the tester is limited to measurements unentangled across copies [CLO22,CLHL22], they remained open when testers are unrestricted in the kind of measurements they can perform. We address this open question by proving nearly instance-optimal bounds for quantum state certification when the tester can perform fully entangled measurements. Analogously to the unentangled setting, we show that the optimal copy complexity for certifying σ\sigmaσ is given by the worst-case complexity times the fidelity between σ\sigmaσ and the maximally mixed state. We prove our lower bounds using a novel quantum analogue of the Ingster-Suslina method, which is likely to be of independent interest. This method also allows us to recover the Ω(d/ϵ2)\Omega(d/\epsilon^2)Ω(d/ϵ2) lower bound for mixedness testing [OW15], i.e., certification of the maximally mixed state, with a surprisingly simple proof.
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06010

Order by:

Want to join this discussion?

Join our community today and start discussing with our members by participating in exciting events, competitions, and challenges. Sign up now to engage with quantum experts!

LoginSign up