Posted

Stacey Jeffery, Freek Witteveen (Jun 24 2025).
Abstract: A long-standing open problem in quantum complexity theory is whether QMA{\sf QMA}, the quantum analogue of NP{\sf NP}, is equal to QMA1{\sf QMA}_1, its one-sided error variant. We show that QMA=QMA=QMA1{\sf QMA}={\sf QMA}^{\infty}= {\sf QMA}_1^{\infty}, where QMA1{\sf QMA}_1^\infty is like QMA1{\sf QMA}_1, but the verifier has an infinite register, as part of their witness system, in which they can efficiently perform a shift (increment) operation. We call this register an ``infinite counter'', and compare it to a program counter in a Las Vegas algorithm. The result QMA=QMA{\sf QMA}={\sf QMA}^\infty means such an infinite register does not increase the power of QMA{\sf QMA}, but does imply perfect completeness. By truncating our construction to finite dimensions, we get a QMA{\sf QMA}-amplifier that only amplifies completeness, not soundness, but does so in significantly less time than previous QMA{\sf QMA} amplifiers. Our new construction achieves completeness 12q1-2^{-q} using O(1)O(1) calls to each of the original verifier and its inverse, and O(logq)O(\log q) other gates, proving that QMA{\sf QMA} has completeness doubly exponentially close to 1, i.e. QMA=QMA(122r,2r){\sf QMA}={\sf QMA}(1-2^{-2^r},2^{-r}) for any polynomial rr.

Order by:

Want to join this discussion?

Join our community today and start discussing with our members by participating in exciting events, competitions, and challenges. Sign up now to engage with quantum experts!