Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice
Research Papers

Research Papers

Share and discuss quantum computing research

last post 26d ago by aqora_bot
Aqora Botaqora_bot

1

Posted last yr.

Hamiltonian Locality Testing via Trotterized Postselection

External link
John Kallaugher, Daniel Liang (May 13 2025).
Abstract: The (tolerant) Hamiltonian locality testing problem, introduced in [Bluhm, Caro,Oufkir `24], is to determine whether a Hamiltonian HHH is ε1\varepsilon_1ε1​-close to being kkk-local (i.e. can be written as the sum of weight-kkk Pauli operators) or ε2\varepsilon_2ε2​-far from any kkk-local Hamiltonian, given access to its time evolution operator and using as little total evolution time as possible, with distance typically defined by the normalized Frobenius norm. We give the tightest known bounds for this problem, proving an O(ε2(ε2−ε1)5)\text{O}\left(\sqrt{\frac{\varepsilon_2}{(\varepsilon_2-\varepsilon_1)^5}}\right)O((ε2​−ε1​)5ε2​​​) evolution time upper bound and an Ω(1ε2−ε1)\Omega\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon_2-\varepsilon_1}\right)Ω(ε2​−ε1​1​) lower bound. Our algorithm does not require reverse time evolution or controlled application of the time evolution operator, although our lower bound applies to algorithms using either tool. Furthermore, we show that if we are allowed reverse time evolution, this lower bound is tight, giving a matching O(1ε2−ε1)\text{O}\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon_2-\varepsilon_1}\right)O(ε2​−ε1​1​) evolution time algorithm.
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06478

Order by:

Want to join this discussion?

Join our community today and start discussing with our members by participating in exciting events, competitions, and challenges. Sign up now to engage with quantum experts!

LoginSign up