Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice
Research Papers

Research Papers

Share and discuss quantum computing research

last post 20d ago by aqora_bot
Aqora Botaqora_bot

1

Posted 20d ago

On estimating operator norm distance, with optimal trace distance estimation when one state is pure

External link
Yupan Liu, Qisheng Wang, Zhan Yu (Jul 07 2026).
Abstract: We investigate the computational complexity of estimating the operator norm distance T∞(ρ0,ρ1){\rm T}_{\infty}(\rho_0,\rho_1)T∞​(ρ0​,ρ1​), defined via the operator norm ∥A∥∞=σmax⁡(A)\|A\|_{\infty} = \sigma_{\max}(A)∥A∥∞​=σmax​(A), given poly(n){\rm poly}(n)poly(n)-size state-preparation circuits of nnn-qubit quantum states ρ0\rho_0ρ0​ and ρ1\rho_1ρ1​. We provide efficient quantum estimators for the operator norm distance whose complexity is independent of the rank (and thus the dimension) of the states: 1. When one state is pure, we establish an optimal quantum estimator using Θ(1/ϵ)\Theta(1/\epsilon)Θ(1/ϵ) queries to the state-preparation circuits. Consequently, for constant additive error, say ϵ=1/5\epsilon=1/5ϵ=1/5, our estimator runs in poly(n){\rm poly}(n)poly(n) time. Since the operator norm distance T∞(∣ψ⟩ ⁣⟨ψ∣,ρ){\rm T}_{\infty}(|\psi\rangle\!\langle\psi|,\rho)T∞​(∣ψ⟩⟨ψ∣,ρ) is exactly half of the trace distance T(∣ψ⟩ ⁣⟨ψ∣,ρ){\rm T}(|\psi\rangle\!\langle\psi|,\rho)T(∣ψ⟩⟨ψ∣,ρ), our result also gives rank-independent query complexity for estimating both quantities, whereas the approaches due to van Apeldoorn, Cornelissen, Gilyén, and Nannicini (SODA 2023) and Wang and Zhang (TIT 2024) have query complexity scaling at least linearly with rank(ρ){\rm rank}(\rho)rank(ρ), which can be exp⁡(n)\exp(n)exp(n) in general. 2. For general quantum states, we also provide a quantum estimator using O~(1/ϵ3/2)\widetilde{O}(1/\epsilon^{3/2})O(1/ϵ3/2) queries to the state-preparation circuits, which shows that the corresponding promise problem is BQP{\sf BQP}BQP-complete and improves the QMA{\sf QMA}QMA upper bound sketched by Liu and Wang (ESA 2025). Together with an Ω(1/ϵ)\Omega(1/\epsilon)Ω(1/ϵ) quantum query complexity lower bound, this leaves only square-root room for improvement. The key intuition behind our estimators is that, when one state is pure, the pure state ∣ψ⟩|\psi\rangle∣ψ⟩ has overlap at least 1/21/21/2 with the top unit eigenvector of ∣ψ⟩ ⁣⟨ψ∣−ρ|\psi\rangle\!\langle\psi|-\rho∣ψ⟩⟨ψ∣−ρ, reflecting a structural feature specific to the operator norm distance.
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03905

Order by:

Want to join this discussion?

Join our community today and start discussing with our members by participating in exciting events, competitions, and challenges. Sign up now to engage with quantum experts!

LoginSign up