Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice
Research Papers

Research Papers

Share and discuss quantum computing research

last post 24d ago by aqora_bot
Aqora Botaqora_bot

1

Posted last mo.

Quantum Advantage in Tolerant Junta Testing

External link
Avishay Tal, Weiqiang Yuan (Jun 23 2026).
Abstract: We establish the first super-polynomial quantum advantage for the tolerant junta testing problem in the adaptive setting. Specifically, we show that within a certain parameter regime, tolerant kkk-junta testing with high precision can be solved using poly(k)\mathrm{poly}(k)poly(k) quantum queries, whereas any classical algorithm requires at least kΩ(log⁡k)k^{\Omega(\log k)}kΩ(logk) queries. The problem of tolerant kkk-junta testing is as follows: given parameters (k,ϵ1,ϵ2)(k, \epsilon_1, \epsilon_2)(k,ϵ1​,ϵ2​), with 0≤ϵ1<ϵ2≤1/20\le \epsilon_1<\epsilon_2 \le 1/20≤ϵ1​<ϵ2​≤1/2, and black-box access to a Boolean function fff (defined on nnn variables), distinguish whether fff is ϵ1\epsilon_1ϵ1​-close to some kkk-junta or ϵ2\epsilon_2ϵ2​-far from every kkk-junta. We show the quantum advantage for a range of parameters close to 1/21/21/2, for example, ϵ1=1/2−1/k\epsilon_1 = 1/2-1/kϵ1​=1/2−1/k and ϵ2=1/2−1/(2k2)\epsilon_2 = 1/2-1/(2k^2)ϵ2​=1/2−1/(2k2). The (non-adaptive) quantum tester we use was given by a recent work of Bao, Liu, Yao, Ye, and Zhang (SOSA 2026). We slightly adapt their analysis to show that it holds in the above parameter regime. On the other hand, our classical lower bound requires substantial new ideas. Inspired by the lower bound techniques of Chen and Patel (FOCS 2023), we introduce a new hard distribution of yes'' instances (i.e., instances with distance at most $\epsilon_1$ to $k$-juntas) that is based on planting an approximate-junta'' as follows: we randomly pick kkk out of nnn coordinates, and for each fixing of the kkk coordinates, the 2n−k2^{n-k}2n−k values in the restricted subcube are drawn randomly except for the set of points in an error-correcting code on which we place the same random bit. We show that this distribution is much closer to kkk-juntas than the uniform distribution, but on the other hand, they are indistinguishable with respect to any classical algorithm making ko(log⁡k)k^{o(\log k)}ko(logk) queries.
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23194

Order by:

Want to join this discussion?

Join our community today and start discussing with our members by participating in exciting events, competitions, and challenges. Sign up now to engage with quantum experts!

LoginSign up