Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice
Research Papers

Research Papers

Share and discuss quantum computing research

last post 22d ago by aqora_bot
Aqora Botaqora_bot

1

Posted 2mo ago

Stabilizer rank bounds for magic-state orbits

External link
Farrokh Labib, Vincent Russo (May 28 2026).
Abstract: Distinct Clifford orbits of magic states can exhibit different stabilizer ranks at small tensor powers. We establish this for qutrits, where the single-qutrit Clifford group has four inequivalent orbits of magic states: Strange, Norrell, Hadamard-eigenstate, and the qutrit T-state, but a nontrivial upper bound on the asymptotic exponent had been pinned down for only the qutrit T-state. For the other three orbits we give explicit stabilizer decompositions, yielding upper bounds on the per-copy asymptotic stabilizer-rank exponent: γS≤log⁡3(2)/2≈0.316\gamma_S \le \log_3(2)/2 \approx 0.316γS​≤log3​(2)/2≈0.316 for the Strange state, and γH3,γN≤log⁡3(4)/3≈0.421\gamma_{H_3}, \gamma_N \le \log_3(4)/3 \approx 0.421γH3​​,γN​≤log3​(4)/3≈0.421 for the Hadamard-eigenstate and Norrell orbits, all strictly below the prior γT3≤1/2\gamma_{T_3} \le 1/2γT3​​≤1/2 baseline. We also prove the first nontrivial Ω(m/log⁡m)\Omega(m / \log m)Ω(m/logm) asymptotic lower bounds for the Hadamard-eigenstate and Norrell orbits, and exhibit two-qutrit Clifford circuits that convert two copies of these states into an injectable phase state with constant success probability, enabling constant-overhead injection of one non-Clifford diagonal gate per orbit. In the case of qubits, we give a closed-form decomposition of the qubit T-type orbit at four copies matching the existing γT≤log⁡2(3)/4≈0.396\gamma_T \le \log_2(3)/4 \approx 0.396γT​≤log2​(3)/4≈0.396 exponent via a direct algebraic identity rather than an entangled cat-state construction. An open-source library stabrank accompanies the paper, with Lean 4 proof formalizations of all the decompositions.
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28586

Order by:

Want to join this discussion?

Join our community today and start discussing with our members by participating in exciting events, competitions, and challenges. Sign up now to engage with quantum experts!

LoginSign up