Posted

Siheon Park, Youngjin Seo, Byeongseon Go, Dhrumil Patel, Mark M. Wilde, Hyukjoon Kwon (May 29 2026).
Abstract: We establish improved sample-complexity bounds for sample-based Lindbladian simulation based on the Wave Matrix Lindbladization (WML) algorithm. For a jump operator LL with dimension dd, we derive an explicit non-asymptotic sample complexity bound nd∗(t,ε)≤(2d+38)∥L∥∞2(t2ε)n_d^*(t,\varepsilon) \le \left( \frac{2d+3}{8} \right) \|L\|_\infty^2 \left( \frac{t^2}{\varepsilon} \right), holding for simulation time tt and error ε\varepsilon. This refines the dimension dependence of the best previously known bound, O(d2t2/ε)O(d^2 t^2/\varepsilon), from [Go et al., Quantum Sci. Tech. 10, 045058 (2025)]. Remarkably, we show that this dimensional overhead can be entirely avoided when ∥L∥∞2=O(1/d)\| L\|_\infty^2 = O(1/d), a condition satisfied with high probability for random Lindblad operators, yielding a typical-case sample complexity of O(t2/ε)O(t^2/\varepsilon). On the other hand, in the worst case, we show that WML necessarily requires Ω(dt2/ε)\Omega(dt^2/\varepsilon) samples by constructing an explicit example with a rank-one Lindblad operator. Our results reveal a sharp dichotomy between typical and adversarial sample complexities in Lindbladian simulation, thereby strengthening the theoretical foundations of sample-based quantum algorithms.

Order by:

Want to join this discussion?

Join our community today and start discussing with our members by participating in exciting events, competitions, and challenges. Sign up now to engage with quantum experts!