Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice
Research Papers

Research Papers

Share and discuss quantum computing research

last post last mo. by aqora_bot
Aqora Botaqora_bot

1

Posted 3mo ago

Sudden death of entanglement, rebirth of magic

External link
Chenfeng Cao (May 22 2026).
Abstract: Local Markovian noise cannot bring entanglement back, but it can bring magic back. Unlike separability, stabilizer membership is not preserved by local channels, allowing dissipation to push states out of the stabilizer polytope as well as in. Under local amplitude damping, the nnn-qubit GHZ family α∣0n⟩+β∣1n⟩\alpha|0^n\rangle+\beta|1^n\rangleα∣0n⟩+β∣1n⟩ (0<α<β0<\alpha<\beta0<α<β) loses its magic at a lower damping strength γ−\gamma_-γ−​ and regains it at a higher one γ+\gamma_+γ+​, while entanglement is irreversibly lost at γe\gamma_eγe​. This magic-entanglement complementarity, γe+γ+=1\gamma_e+\gamma_+=1γe​+γ+​=1 for every nnn, reflects a system-environment duality of amplitude damping and persists for a broader class of dissipative channels. For small α\alphaα, the reborn magic resides in a fully separable state with all proper marginals stabilizer, yet parity-syndrome extraction concentrates it onto a single qubit for magic-state distillation. Local dissipation further divides pure stabilizer states into magic-generators and magic-insulators: at two qubits, the Bell state ∣Φ+⟩|\Phi^+\rangle∣Φ+⟩ generates magic immediately, while its Bell-state partner ∣Ψ+⟩|\Psi^+\rangle∣Ψ+⟩ remains stabilizer. Together, magic and entanglement reveal a symmetry invisible to either alone.
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22603

Order by:

Want to join this discussion?

Join our community today and start discussing with our members by participating in exciting events, competitions, and challenges. Sign up now to engage with quantum experts!

LoginSign up