Posted

Vahid R. Asadi, Atsuya Hasegawa, François Le Gall (May 12 2026).
Abstract: It is known that there exist multi-prover interactive protocols (MIP\mathsf{MIP} protocols) for the complexity class NEXP\mathsf{NEXP}, succinct MIP\mathsf{MIP} protocols for NP\mathsf{NP} and multi-prover interactive protocols with shared entanglement (MIP\mathsf{MIP}^\ast protocols) for RE\mathsf{RE}. This extraordinary power of multi-prover interactive proof systems comes from the assumption that provers do not communicate with each other during the protocols. If they are allowed to communicate freely, the setting is the same as in the single-prover case, and the computational power of the system becomes significantly weaker. In this paper, we investigate for the first time the setting where communication (i.e., leakage of information) between provers is allowed but bounded. We introduce two techniques to approach this question and show that multi-prover interactive proof systems are robust against some amount of leakage. Our first technique is based on parallel repetition theorems. We apply it to show that for any polynomial pp, we can construct two-prover one-round MIP\mathsf{MIP} and MIP\mathsf{MIP}^\ast protocols for NEXP\mathsf{NEXP} and RE\mathsf{RE}, respectively, that are robust against p(n)p(n) bits of leakage. We further derive our second technique to convert any low-soundness PCP construction to a two-prover one-round MIP\mathsf{MIP} protocol for NP\mathsf{NP} robust against leakage. We also discuss the relation between robustness against leakage in multi-prover interactive proof systems and the Sliding Scale Conjecture in the PCP literature.

Order by:

Want to join this discussion?

Join our community today and start discussing with our members by participating in exciting events, competitions, and challenges. Sign up now to engage with quantum experts!