Posted

Scott Aaronson, Anand Natarajan, Avishay Tal, Agi Villanyi (Apr 15 2026).
Abstract: Complexity class containments involving interactive proof classes are famously nonrelativizing: although IP=PSPACE\mathsf{IP} = \mathsf{PSPACE}, Fortnow and Sipser showed that that there exists an oracle relative to which coNP⊈IP\mathsf{coNP} \not\subseteq \mathsf{IP}. In contrast, the question of whether the containment BQPIP\mathsf{BQP} \subseteq \mathsf{IP} is relativizing remains wide open. In this work we make progress towards resolving this question by showing that the containment BQPMIP\mathsf{BQP} \subseteq \mathsf{MIP} holds with respect to any classical oracle. We obtain this result by constructing, for any classical oracle OO, a PCP\mathsf{PCP} proof system for BQPO\mathsf{BQP}^{O} where the verifier makes polynomially many classical queries to an exponentially-long proof, and to the oracle OO. Our construction is inspired by the state synthesis algorithm of Grover and Rudolph, and serves as a complement to the "exponential PCP" constructed by Aharonov, Arad, and Vidick, which achieves similar parameters but which is based on different ideas and does not relativize. We propose relativization as a proxy for prover efficiency, and hope that progress towards an IP\mathsf{IP} for BQP\mathsf{BQP} in the oracle world will lead to a non-cryptographic interactive protocol for proving any quantum computation to a classical skeptic in the unrelativized world, which is a longstanding open problem in quantum complexity theory.

Order by:

Want to join this discussion?

Join our community today and start discussing with our members by participating in exciting events, competitions, and challenges. Sign up now to engage with quantum experts!