PeterYS

Hi @antoine @stubbi , thanks, I think I have the solution now. Btw, I think the website jumps to the top of the page every time I @ someone in the comments, for some reason.

Hi @stubbi, I think I've found a way to get around this. Thanks.

Hi @stubbi, yes, I believe so. I will check again tomorrow and get back to you.

Thanks!

Hi @stubbi,

What I mean is that the simulation overhead for the classical method, SGDOneClassSVM—which is the one I am using and has an accuracy of around 0.85—is much smaller than that of the quantum counterpart.

My quantum computational solution is simply to add angle embedding for the classical data, but the simulation takes hours to run...

I suppose I need to find a way to work around this.

Great! Thanks Julian. This helps a lot, clarifying the metrics for me.

Ah, got it. Thanks Julian!

I see. Thanks for the explanation and the debug code, which is very useful! I just checked the 'w's in each trial, from the backend's discrepancy function (which I think is used to calculate the score during each test). It seems that all those values are totally random, without the constraint of being positive? Does that make sense for values like, people's age?