Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9912112

The Double Quantum Dot Feline Cousin of Schroedinger's Cat: An Experimental Testbed for a Discourse of Quantum Measurement Dichotomies

Supriyo Bandyopadhyay

Published Dec 27, 1999• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Intriguing dichotomies in quantum measurement theory involving the role of the obersever, objective reality, collapse of wavefunctions and actualization of a measurement outcome are cast into a patholigical gedanken experiment involving a single electron in a double quantum dot system coupled via a weak link.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9912112

Related papers

The Double Quantum Dot Feline Cousin of Schrödinger's Cat : An Experimental Test bed for a Discourse of Quantum Measurement Dichotomies

S. Bandyopadhyay

Intriguing dichotomies in quantum measurement theory involving the role of the obersever, objective reality, collapse of wavefunctions and actualization of a measurement outcome are cast into a patholigical gedanken experiment involving a single electron in a double quantum dot system coupled via a weak link.

•Dec 28, 1999•0 citations

The Double Quantum Dot Feline Cousin of Schrödinger's Cat

Somshubhro Bandyopadhyay

•Dec 28, 1999•0 citations

Quantum erasing the nature of reality: or, perhaps, the reality of nature?

Paul G. Kwiat, Berthold‐Georg Englert

Introduction WHY must I treat the measuring device classically? What will happen to me if I don't?! Eugene Wigner The quantum measurement problem – how does an apparently “classical” definite world arise out of the random world of quantum superpositions – was and continues to be one of the fundamental philosophical issues in quantum mechanics. What we mean by a classical world, for example, is one in which macroscopic objects are not in superposition states of being simultaneously in several locations at once, and cats are never in coherent superpositions of being alive and dead. This lack of coherence is actually a loss of the coherence that exists at the level of the isolated quanta, but somehow does not survive the transition to the classical level of measuring apparatus. Such incoherent states are known as mixed states. Therefore, to study the quantum–classical interface, or even to investigate whether such an interface exists at all other than in the minds of “classical sympathizers,” one should look carefully at mixed states, how they arise and how they behave. Here we describe a set of experiments, both real and gedanken , investigating the subtleties of quantum interference when mixed states are involved. We start by describing the well-known double-slit experiment, and the loss of interference when which-path information can be had.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 22, 2004•12 citations

A Flea on Schroedinger's Cat

Klaas Landsman, Robin Reuvers

We propose a technical reformulation of the measurement problem of quantum mechanics, which is based on the postulate that the final state of a measurement is classical. Unlike the usual formulation (in which the post-measurement state is a unit vector in Hilbert space), our version actually opens the possibility of admitting a purely technical solution within the confines of conventional quantum theory (as opposed to solutions that either modify this theory, or introduce unusual and controversial interpretative rules and/or ontologies). To that effect, we recall a remarkable phenomenon in the theory of Schroedinger operators (discovered in 1981 by Jona-Lasinio et al), according to which the ground state of a symmetric double-well Hamiltonian becomes exponentially sensitive to tiny perturbations of the potential as h -> 0. We show that this instability emerges also from the textbook WKB approximation, extend it to time-dependent perturbations, and study the dynamical transition from the ground state of the double well to the perturbed ground state (in which the cat is typically either dead or alive, depending on the details of the perturbation). Numerical simulations show that adiabatically arising perturbations may (quite literally) cause the collapse of the wave-function in the classical limit. Thus, at least in the context of a simple mathematical model, we combine the technical and conceptual virtues of decoherence (which fails to solve the measurement problem but launches the key idea that perturbations may come from the environment) with those of dynamical collapse models a la GRW (which do solve the measurement problem but are ad hoc), without sharing their drawbacks: single measurement outcomes are obtained (instead of merely diagonal reduced density matrices), and no modification of quantum mechanics is needed.

arXiv:1210.2353•Oct 8, 2012•5 citations

Entanglement, decoherence, and measurement

Art Hobson

The fully entangled Schrodinger cat state obtained immediately upon measurement of a superposed two state quantum system by a detector is often said to paradoxically predict macroscopically different outcomes simultaneously. However, nonlocal interferometry experiments and their accompanying quantum theoretical analyses, testing momentum entangled photon pairs over the full range of phases, demonstrate that the cat state does not fit this description. This state instead represents two nonlocally coherent correlations between its subsystems. Even if the detector is a cat, this state is not paradoxical. Furthermore, standard quantum theory correctly predicts the experimentally observed nonparadoxical outcomes. Thus both quantum theory and quantum experiments show there is no Schrodinger cat paradox associated with measurement. This resolves the problem of definite outcomes and, with it, the measurement problem. Upon entanglement with a detector, superpositions collapse nonlocally and unitarily to one definite macroscopic outcome. No special collapse postulate is needed.

•Apr 10, 2019•1 citation

Re-assessment of the state of Schroedinger's cat, final version

Art Hobson

The quantum state of Schroedinger's cat is usually incorrectly described as a superposition of "dead" and "alive," despite an argument by Rinner and Werner that, locally, the cat should be considered to be in a mixture of non-superposed states. Here, it is rigorously proven that the cat is not in a superposition. This is central to the measurement problem. Nonlocal two-photon interferometry experiments throw further light on the measurement state by probing the effect of a variable phase factor inserted between its superposed terms. These experiments demonstrate that both subsystems really are in locally mixed states rather than superpositions, and they tell us what the measurement state superposition actually superposes. They show that measurement transfers the coherence in Schroedinger's nuclear superposition neither to the cat nor to the nucleus, but only to the correlations between them. This explains the collapse process--but not its subsequent irreversible dissipation--within the context of unitary dynamics with no need for external entities such as the environment, a human mind, other worlds, or collapse mechanisms.

arXiv:1206.5189•Jun 21, 2012•0 citations
Introduction WHY must I treat the measuring device classically? What will happen to me if I don't?! Eugene Wigner The quantum measurement problem – how does an apparently “classical” definite world arise out of the random world of quantum superpositions – was and continues to be one of the fundamental philosophical issues in quantum mechanics. What we mean by a classical world, for example, is one in which macroscopic objects are not in superposition states of being simultaneously in several locations at once, and cats are never in coherent superpositions of being alive and dead. This lack of coherence is actually a loss of the coherence that exists at the level of the isolated quanta, but somehow does not survive the transition to the classical level of measuring apparatus. Such incoherent states are known as mixed states. Therefore, to study the quantum–classical interface, or even to investigate whether such an interface exists at all other than in the minds of “classical sympathizers,” one should look carefully at mixed states, how they arise and how they behave. Here we describe a set of experiments, both real and gedanken , investigating the subtleties of quantum interference when mixed states are involved. We start by describing the well-known double-slit experiment, and the loss of interference when which-path information can be had.
We propose a technical reformulation of the measurement problem of quantum mechanics, which is based on the postulate that the final state of a measurement is classical. Unlike the usual formulation (in which the post-measurement state is a unit vector in Hilbert space), our version actually opens the possibility of admitting a purely technical solution within the confines of conventional quantum theory (as opposed to solutions that either modify this theory, or introduce unusual and controversial interpretative rules and/or ontologies). To that effect, we recall a remarkable phenomenon in the theory of Schroedinger operators (discovered in 1981 by Jona-Lasinio et al), according to which the ground state of a symmetric double-well Hamiltonian becomes exponentially sensitive to tiny perturbations of the potential as h -> 0. We show that this instability emerges also from the textbook WKB approximation, extend it to time-dependent perturbations, and study the dynamical transition from the ground state of the double well to the perturbed ground state (in which the cat is typically either dead or alive, depending on the details of the perturbation). Numerical simulations show that adiabatically arising perturbations may (quite literally) cause the collapse of the wave-function in the classical limit. Thus, at least in the context of a simple mathematical model, we combine the technical and conceptual virtues of decoherence (which fails to solve the measurement problem but launches the key idea that perturbations may come from the environment) with those of dynamical collapse models a la GRW (which do solve the measurement problem but are ad hoc), without sharing their drawbacks: single measurement outcomes are obtained (instead of merely diagonal reduced density matrices), and no modification of quantum mechanics is needed.
The fully entangled Schrodinger cat state obtained immediately upon measurement of a superposed two state quantum system by a detector is often said to paradoxically predict macroscopically different outcomes simultaneously. However, nonlocal interferometry experiments and their accompanying quantum theoretical analyses, testing momentum entangled photon pairs over the full range of phases, demonstrate that the cat state does not fit this description. This state instead represents two nonlocally coherent correlations between its subsystems. Even if the detector is a cat, this state is not paradoxical. Furthermore, standard quantum theory correctly predicts the experimentally observed nonparadoxical outcomes. Thus both quantum theory and quantum experiments show there is no Schrodinger cat paradox associated with measurement. This resolves the problem of definite outcomes and, with it, the measurement problem. Upon entanglement with a detector, superpositions collapse nonlocally and unitarily to one definite macroscopic outcome. No special collapse postulate is needed.
The quantum state of Schroedinger's cat is usually incorrectly described as a superposition of "dead" and "alive," despite an argument by Rinner and Werner that, locally, the cat should be considered to be in a mixture of non-superposed states. Here, it is rigorously proven that the cat is not in a superposition. This is central to the measurement problem. Nonlocal two-photon interferometry experiments throw further light on the measurement state by probing the effect of a variable phase factor inserted between its superposed terms. These experiments demonstrate that both subsystems really are in locally mixed states rather than superpositions, and they tell us what the measurement state superposition actually superposes. They show that measurement transfers the coherence in Schroedinger's nuclear superposition neither to the cat nor to the nucleus, but only to the correlations between them. This explains the collapse process--but not its subsequent irreversible dissipation--within the context of unitary dynamics with no need for external entities such as the environment, a human mind, other worlds, or collapse mechanisms.