Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9912108 · Physics Letters A

Complementarity between position and momentum as a consequence of Kochen–Specker arguments

Rob Clifton

Published Jun 1, 2000• 31 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/s0375-9601(00)00365-0

Related papers

Sequential Measurements and the Kochen–Specker Arguments

Gábor Hofer‐Szabó

Journal for General Philosophy of Science•Jul 31, 2023•0 citations

Correlation Between Position and Momentum. A Phase-Space View

Jens Peder Dahl

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•1 citation

Hybrid ququart-encoded quantum cryptography protected by Kochen-Specker contextuality

Adán Cabello, Vincenzo D’Ambrosio, Eleonora Nagali +1 more

Quantum cryptographic protocols based on complementarity are not secure against attacks in which complementarity is imitated with classical resources. The Kochen-Specker (KS) theorem provides protection against these attacks, without requiring entanglement or spatially separated composite systems. We analyze the maximum tolerated noise to guarantee the security of a KS-protected cryptographic scheme against these attacks and describe a photonic realization of this scheme using hybrid ququarts defined by the polarization and orbital angular momentum of single photons.

arXiv:1109.2508•Physical Review A•Sep 12, 2011•58 citations

Momentum-position complementarity in stochastic mechanics

Francesco Guerra, Laura M. Morato

Springer eBooks•Apr 6, 2008•0 citations

Contextuality of Approximate Measurements

D. M. Appleby

The claim of Meyer, Kent and Clifton (MKC) that finite precision measurement nullifies the Kochen-Specker theorem is criticised. It is argued that, although MKC have nullified the Kochen-Specker theorem strictly so-called, there are other, related propositions which are not nullified. The argument given is an elaboration of some of Mermin's critical remarks. Although MKC allow for the fact that the observables to be measured cannot be precisely specified, they continue to assume that the observables which are actually measured are strictly commuting. As Mermin points out, this assumption is unjustified. Consequently, the analysis of MKC is incomplete. To make it complete one needs to investigate the predictions their models make regarding approximate joint measurements of non-commuting observables. Such an investigation is carried out, using methods previously developed in connection with approximate joint measurements of position and momentum. It is shown that a form of contextuality then re-emerges.

arXiv:quant-ph/0005010•May 1, 2000•5 citations

A Closer Look at the Uncertainty Relation of Position and Momentum

Thomas Schürmann, Ingo Hoffmann

arXiv:0811.2582•Foundations of Physics•Apr 8, 2009•48 citations
Quantum cryptographic protocols based on complementarity are not secure against attacks in which complementarity is imitated with classical resources. The Kochen-Specker (KS) theorem provides protection against these attacks, without requiring entanglement or spatially separated composite systems. We analyze the maximum tolerated noise to guarantee the security of a KS-protected cryptographic scheme against these attacks and describe a photonic realization of this scheme using hybrid ququarts defined by the polarization and orbital angular momentum of single photons.
The claim of Meyer, Kent and Clifton (MKC) that finite precision measurement nullifies the Kochen-Specker theorem is criticised. It is argued that, although MKC have nullified the Kochen-Specker theorem strictly so-called, there are other, related propositions which are not nullified. The argument given is an elaboration of some of Mermin's critical remarks. Although MKC allow for the fact that the observables to be measured cannot be precisely specified, they continue to assume that the observables which are actually measured are strictly commuting. As Mermin points out, this assumption is unjustified. Consequently, the analysis of MKC is incomplete. To make it complete one needs to investigate the predictions their models make regarding approximate joint measurements of non-commuting observables. Such an investigation is carried out, using methods previously developed in connection with approximate joint measurements of position and momentum. It is shown that a form of contextuality then re-emerges.