Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9908030 · Europhysics Letters (EPL)

Are violations to temporal Bell inequalities there when somebody looks?

T Calarco, M Cini, Roberto Onofrio

Published Aug 15, 1999• 10 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The possibility of observing violations of temporal Bell inequalities, originally proposed by Leggett and Garg as a mean of testing the quantum-mechanical delocalization of suitably chosen macroscopic bodies, is discussed by taking into account the effect of the measurement process. A general criterion quantifying this possibility is defined and shown not to be fulfilled by the various experimental configurations proposed so far to test inequalities of different forms.

DOI
10.1209/epl/i1999-00403-3

Related papers

Are violations to temporal Bell inequalities there when somebody looks?

Tommaso Calarco, Michele Cini, Roberto Onofrio

The possibility of observing violations of temporal Bell inequalities, originally proposed by Leggett as a mean of testing the quantum mechanical delocalization of suitably chosen macroscopic bodies, is discussed by taking into account the effect of the measurement process. A general criterion quantifying this possibility is defined and shown not to be fulfilled by the various experimental configurations proposed so far to test inequalities of different forms.

•Aug 10, 1999•11 citations

Some theoretical considerations related to the experimental tests of a Temporal Bell's inequality

Mao-Chuang Yeh

"According to the quantum superposition principle, quantum mechanics at the macroscopic scale predicts that a macroscopic system can be in more than one distinct state at the same time. Such an extrapolation of quantum mechanics contradicts our everyday instinct, summarized by Leggett and Garg (LG) under the heading of macrorealism (MR) [1]. To resolve the conflict and to determine whether MR or quantum mechanics is the right description of macroscopic objects, in 1985, Leggett and Garg [1] proposed the temporal Bell's inequality (TBI). If a macorealist description is possible, the inequality is satisfied - quantum mechanics, on the other hand, predicts a violation. Thereafter, people were motivated to engineer macroscopic quantum systems and to test the TBI. In the TBI, one of the most critical postulates is that of the noninvasive measurability (NIM) : it is in principle possible to determine which state the system is in with an arbitrarily small e ect on the subsequent system dynamics. To satisfy the NIM postulate in the TBI experiment, the implementation of the ""ideal negative result"" (INR) measurement was also proposed by LG [1]. In a two-state system, an INR measurement is designed to interact (in each run) with only one of two system states. Only runs where the measurement reported no outcome are kept. Although in the last few years there have been tests of the TBI on microscopic systems with the use of INR measurements [4] and on macroscopic systems using weak measurement [5], no one has ever implemented INR measurements on macroscopic systems in TBI tests so far. In addition, the NIM postulate was simply assumed, and not veri ed by an ancillary test [9, 3]. With these considerations in mind, there are two main tasks in this thesis: the rst one is to analyze the realization of an INR measurement on a macroscopic object. I propose an experiment based on coupling a flux-qubit to a dcSQUID, which mirrors the approach of Knee et al. [4], where the system of interest is coupled to another quantum system which acts as a measuring device. In order to accomplish the first task, we analyze the escape dynamics of a flux-qubit SQUID composite system in various limits and discuss the prospects of operating in a regime realizing a von Neumann (""projective"")-like measurement onto the qubit flux basis. Later in the thesis, I discuss current feasibility of the proposed experiment based on the possible measurement error (the ""venality"" [4]) of our INR measurement. The second task is to analyze experimental tests of measurement invasiveness. I propose a concrete protocol, ancillary to the main TBI experiment, which may narrow some loopholes in the test of MR [3]. I generalize the approach of Wilde and Mizel [3], using the behavior of the two-time correlator of a system as an indicator of measurement invasiveness. The measured invasivities can be used to give a improved lower bound for the TBI."

•Aug 16, 2016•1 citation

Realism with Quantum Faces: The Leggett–Garg Inequalities as a Case Study for Feyerabend's Views

Elise M. Crull

In this paper I attempt to broaden Feyerabend scholarship by asking whether and how Feyerabend's philosophy of science, in particular his commitments to realism and pluralism about scientific theories as well as anarchism about scientific methods, is borne out in multidisciplinary research concerning the Leggett–Garg inequalities. These inequalities were derived explicitly to be a temporal analogue to Bell's inequalities: the viability of macroscopic realism is tested against the predictions of quantum mechanics by performing a series measurements on a macroscopic variable of one system at different time intervals, then evaluating correlations among resultant values. In the nearly forty years since Leggett and Garg's paper, questions continue to be raised whether common tests of these inequalities reveal genuine violations or merely experimental disturbances. There is also much debate about what genuine violations in fact signify, if (as most agree) they are not straight-forwardly analogous to Bell tests. Taking this fascinating and as yet largely unsettled episode from physics as a case study, I derive three Feyerabendian lessons that demonstrate the relevance of his views even today.

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science•Jul 17, 2024•3 citations

Leggett–Garg inequalities

Clive Emary, Neill Lambert, Franco Nori

In contrast to the spatial Bell's inequalities which probe entanglement between spatially separated systems, the Leggett–Garg inequalities test the correlations of a single system measured at different times. Violation of a genuine Leggett–Garg test implies either the absence of a realistic description of the system or the impossibility of measuring the system without disturbing it. Quantum mechanics violates the inequalities on both accounts and the original motivation for these inequalities was as a test for quantum coherence in macroscopic systems. The last few years has seen a number of experimental tests and violations of these inequalities in a variety of microscopic systems such as superconducting qubits, nuclear spins, and photons. In this article, we provide an introduction to the Leggett–Garg inequalities and review these latest experimental developments. We discuss important topics such as the significance of the non-invasive measurability assumption, the clumsiness loophole, and the role of weak measurements. Also covered are some recent theoretical proposals for the application of Leggett–Garg inequalities in quantum transport, quantum biology and nano-mechanical systems.

arXiv:1304.5133•Reports on Progress in Physics•Dec 23, 2013•432 citations

Leggett-Garg inequalities for squeezed states

Jérôme Martin, Vincent Vennin

Temporal Bell inequalities, or Leggett-Garg inequalities (LGIs), are studied for continuous-variable systems placed in a squeezed state. The importance of those systems lies in their broad applicability, which allows the description of many different physical settings in various branches of physics, ranging from cosmology to condensed matter physics and from optics to quantum information theory. Leggett-Garg inequality violations are explored and systematically mapped in squeezing parameter space. Configurations for which LGI violation occurs are found, but it is shown that no violation can be obtained if all squeezing angles vanish, contrary to what happens for the spatial Bell inequalities. We also assess the effect of decoherence on the detectability of such violations. Our study opens up the possibility of new experimental designs for the observation of LGI violation.

arXiv:1611.01785•Physical Review A•Nov 28, 2016•33 citations

Condition for macroscopic realism beyond the Leggett-Garg inequalities

Johannes Kofler, Časlav Brukner

In 1985, Leggett and Garg put forward the concept of macroscopic realism (macrorealism) and, in analogy to Bell's theorem, derived a necessary condition in terms of inequalities, which are now known as the Leggett-Garg inequalities. In this paper, we discuss another necessary condition called no-signaling in time. It solely bases on comparing the probability distribution for a macrovariable at some time for the cases where previously a measurement has or has not been performed. Although the concept is analogous to the no-signaling condition in the case of Bell tests, it can be violated according to quantum mechanical predictions even in situations where no violation of Leggett-Garg inequalities is possible.

arXiv:1207.3666•Physical Review A•May 13, 2013•196 citations
The possibility of observing violations of temporal Bell inequalities, originally proposed by Leggett and Garg as a mean of testing the quantum-mechanical delocalization of suitably chosen macroscopic bodies, is discussed by taking into account the effect of the measurement process. A general criterion quantifying this possibility is defined and shown not to be fulfilled by the various experimental configurations proposed so far to test inequalities of different forms.
"According to the quantum superposition principle, quantum mechanics at the macroscopic scale predicts that a macroscopic system can be in more than one distinct state at the same time. Such an extrapolation of quantum mechanics contradicts our everyday instinct, summarized by Leggett and Garg (LG) under the heading of macrorealism (MR) [1]. To resolve the conflict and to determine whether MR or quantum mechanics is the right description of macroscopic objects, in 1985, Leggett and Garg [1] proposed the temporal Bell's inequality (TBI). If a macorealist description is possible, the inequality is satisfied - quantum mechanics, on the other hand, predicts a violation. Thereafter, people were motivated to engineer macroscopic quantum systems and to test the TBI. In the TBI, one of the most critical postulates is that of the noninvasive measurability (NIM) : it is in principle possible to determine which state the system is in with an arbitrarily small e ect on the subsequent system dynamics. To satisfy the NIM postulate in the TBI experiment, the implementation of the ""ideal negative result"" (INR) measurement was also proposed by LG [1]. In a two-state system, an INR measurement is designed to interact (in each run) with only one of two system states. Only runs where the measurement reported no outcome are kept. Although in the last few years there have been tests of the TBI on microscopic systems with the use of INR measurements [4] and on macroscopic systems using weak measurement [5], no one has ever implemented INR measurements on macroscopic systems in TBI tests so far. In addition, the NIM postulate was simply assumed, and not veri ed by an ancillary test [9, 3]. With these considerations in mind, there are two main tasks in this thesis: the rst one is to analyze the realization of an INR measurement on a macroscopic object. I propose an experiment based on coupling a flux-qubit to a dcSQUID, which mirrors the approach of Knee et al. [4], where the system of interest is coupled to another quantum system which acts as a measuring device. In order to accomplish the first task, we analyze the escape dynamics of a flux-qubit SQUID composite system in various limits and discuss the prospects of operating in a regime realizing a von Neumann (""projective"")-like measurement onto the qubit flux basis. Later in the thesis, I discuss current feasibility of the proposed experiment based on the possible measurement error (the ""venality"" [4]) of our INR measurement. The second task is to analyze experimental tests of measurement invasiveness. I propose a concrete protocol, ancillary to the main TBI experiment, which may narrow some loopholes in the test of MR [3]. I generalize the approach of Wilde and Mizel [3], using the behavior of the two-time correlator of a system as an indicator of measurement invasiveness. The measured invasivities can be used to give a improved lower bound for the TBI."
In this paper I attempt to broaden Feyerabend scholarship by asking whether and how Feyerabend's philosophy of science, in particular his commitments to realism and pluralism about scientific theories as well as anarchism about scientific methods, is borne out in multidisciplinary research concerning the Leggett–Garg inequalities. These inequalities were derived explicitly to be a temporal analogue to Bell's inequalities: the viability of macroscopic realism is tested against the predictions of quantum mechanics by performing a series measurements on a macroscopic variable of one system at different time intervals, then evaluating correlations among resultant values. In the nearly forty years since Leggett and Garg's paper, questions continue to be raised whether common tests of these inequalities reveal genuine violations or merely experimental disturbances. There is also much debate about what genuine violations in fact signify, if (as most agree) they are not straight-forwardly analogous to Bell tests. Taking this fascinating and as yet largely unsettled episode from physics as a case study, I derive three Feyerabendian lessons that demonstrate the relevance of his views even today.
In contrast to the spatial Bell's inequalities which probe entanglement between spatially separated systems, the Leggett–Garg inequalities test the correlations of a single system measured at different times. Violation of a genuine Leggett–Garg test implies either the absence of a realistic description of the system or the impossibility of measuring the system without disturbing it. Quantum mechanics violates the inequalities on both accounts and the original motivation for these inequalities was as a test for quantum coherence in macroscopic systems. The last few years has seen a number of experimental tests and violations of these inequalities in a variety of microscopic systems such as superconducting qubits, nuclear spins, and photons. In this article, we provide an introduction to the Leggett–Garg inequalities and review these latest experimental developments. We discuss important topics such as the significance of the non-invasive measurability assumption, the clumsiness loophole, and the role of weak measurements. Also covered are some recent theoretical proposals for the application of Leggett–Garg inequalities in quantum transport, quantum biology and nano-mechanical systems.
Temporal Bell inequalities, or Leggett-Garg inequalities (LGIs), are studied for continuous-variable systems placed in a squeezed state. The importance of those systems lies in their broad applicability, which allows the description of many different physical settings in various branches of physics, ranging from cosmology to condensed matter physics and from optics to quantum information theory. Leggett-Garg inequality violations are explored and systematically mapped in squeezing parameter space. Configurations for which LGI violation occurs are found, but it is shown that no violation can be obtained if all squeezing angles vanish, contrary to what happens for the spatial Bell inequalities. We also assess the effect of decoherence on the detectability of such violations. Our study opens up the possibility of new experimental designs for the observation of LGI violation.
In 1985, Leggett and Garg put forward the concept of macroscopic realism (macrorealism) and, in analogy to Bell's theorem, derived a necessary condition in terms of inequalities, which are now known as the Leggett-Garg inequalities. In this paper, we discuss another necessary condition called no-signaling in time. It solely bases on comparing the probability distribution for a macrovariable at some time for the cases where previously a measurement has or has not been performed. Although the concept is analogous to the no-signaling condition in the case of Bell tests, it can be violated according to quantum mechanical predictions even in situations where no violation of Leggett-Garg inequalities is possible.