Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9906034 · Physical Review A

Classical interventions in quantum systems. II. Relativistic invariance

Asher Peres

Published Jan 18, 2000• 49 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

If several interventions performed on a quantum system are localized in mutually spacelike regions, they will be recorded as a sequence of ``quantum jumps'' in one Lorentz frame, and as a different sequence of jumps in another Lorentz frame. Conditions are specified that must be obeyed by the various operators involved in the calculations, so that these two different sequences lead to the same observable results. These conditions are similar to the equal-time commutation relations in quantum field theory. They are sufficient to prevent superluminal signaling. (The derivation of these results does not require most of the contents of the preceding article [Peres, Phys. Rev. A 61, 022116 (2000)]. What is needed is briefly summarized here, so that the present article is essentially self-contained.)

DOI
10.1103/physreva.61.022117

Related papers

Lorentz transformations of open systems

Asher Peres, Daniel R. Terno

We consider open dynamical systems, subject to external interventions by agents that are not completely described by the theory (classical or quantal). These interventions are localized in regions that are relatively spacelike. Under these circumstances, no relativistic transformation law exists which relates the descriptions of the physical system by observers in relative motion. Still, physical laws are the same in all Lorentz frames.

arXiv:quant-ph/0106079•Journal of Modern Optics•Jul 1, 2002•17 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Classical interventions in quantum systems. II. Relativistic Invariance’ ”

Asher Peres

Contrary to the claim in the preceding Comment, the operators that describe the complete time evolution of a quantum system have a covariant transformation law, even though they are built from expressions that belong to separate subsystems and do not obey Lorentz transformations. The reason is that these are open subsystems, and different parts of the universe are excluded in their description. However, the complete system still obeys Lorentz covariance.

Physical Review A•Nov 9, 2001•2 citations

Comment on “Classical interventions in quantum systems II. Relativistic invariance”

Hrvoje Nikolić

In a recent paper [Phys. Rev. A 61, 022117 (2000)], A. Peres argued that quantum mechanics is consistent with special relativity by proposing that the operators that describe time evolution do not need to transform covariantly, although the measurable quantities need to transform covariantly. We discuss the weaknesses of this proposal.

arXiv:quant-ph/0109120•Physical Review A•Nov 9, 2001•2 citations

Wave Function Collapse, Lorentz Invariance, and the Third Postulate of Relativity

Edward J. Gillis

The changes that quantum states undergo during measurement are both probabilistic and nonlocal. These two characteristics complement one another to insure compatibility with relativity and maintain conservation laws. The probabilistic nature of nonlocal effects prevents the superluminal transmission of information, while nonlocal entanglement relations provide a means to enforce conservation laws in a probabilistic theory. In order to explain measurement-induced changes in terms of fundamental physical processes it is important to take these two key characteristics into account. One way to do this is to modify the Schroedinger equation by adding stochastic, nonlinear terms. A number of such proposals have been made over the past few decades. A recently proposed equation based on the assumption that wave function collapse is induced by a sequence of correlating interactions of the kind that constitute measurements has been shown to maintain strict adherence to conservation laws in individual instances, and has also eliminated the need to introduce any new, ad hoc physical constants. In this work it is shone that the proposed stochastic modification to the Schroedinger equation is also Lorentz invariant, even though it is formulated in a preferred reference frame. It is further argued that the additional spacetime structure that the proposed modification requires provides a way to implement the assumption that spacelike-separated operators (and measurements) commute, and that this assumption of local commutativity should be regarded as a third postulate of relativity.

arXiv:2405.05335•May 8, 2024•0 citations

Quantum Observables associated with Einstein Localisation

Marc-Thierry Jaekel, Serge Reynaud

The description of relativistic effects requires a preliminary definition of events localised in space-time while the clocks used for time definition and the fields used in synchronisation or localisation procedures are necessarily quantum systems. We outline an algebraic framework where basic requirements of quantum theory and relativity are consistently dealt with. This approach which may be termed as a `quantum relativity' is built on the algebra of symmetries. It contains the definition of quantum observables associated with Einstein localisation in space-time as well as the evaluation of their commutation relations including the energy-time relation. These commutators also describe the relativistic shifts undergone under frame transformations, not only for inertial frames but also for uniformly accelerated frames. The quantum redshift laws differ from their classical counterparts while still obeying universal metric properties. The paper presents this approach in terms closely connected to the seminal Einstein conception of localisation in space-time and refers to already published papers for more technical developments.

arXiv:quant-ph/9810027•Oct 9, 1998•1 citation

Events and Covariance in the Interpretation of Quantum Field Theory

Dennis Dieks

In relativistic quantum field theory the notion of a local operation is regarded as basic: each open space-time region is associated with an algebra of observables representing possible measurements performed within this region. It is much more difficult to accommodate the notions of events taking place in such regions or of localized objects. But how can the notion of a local operation be basic in the theory if this same theory would not be able to represent localized measuring devices and localized events? After briefly reviewing these difficulties we discuss a strategy for eliminating the tension, namely by interpreting quantum theory in a realist way. To implement this strategy we use the ideas of the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics. We then consider the question of whether the resulting scheme can be made Lorentz invariant.

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Nov 1, 2002•11 citations
If several interventions performed on a quantum system are localized in mutually spacelike regions, they will be recorded as a sequence of ``quantum jumps'' in one Lorentz frame, and as a different sequence of jumps in another Lorentz frame. Conditions are specified that must be obeyed by the various operators involved in the calculations, so that these two different sequences lead to the same observable results. These conditions are similar to the equal-time commutation relations in quantum field theory. They are sufficient to prevent superluminal signaling. (The derivation of these results does not require most of the contents of the preceding article [Peres, Phys. Rev. A 61, 022116 (2000)]. What is needed is briefly summarized here, so that the present article is essentially self-contained.)
The changes that quantum states undergo during measurement are both probabilistic and nonlocal. These two characteristics complement one another to insure compatibility with relativity and maintain conservation laws. The probabilistic nature of nonlocal effects prevents the superluminal transmission of information, while nonlocal entanglement relations provide a means to enforce conservation laws in a probabilistic theory. In order to explain measurement-induced changes in terms of fundamental physical processes it is important to take these two key characteristics into account. One way to do this is to modify the Schroedinger equation by adding stochastic, nonlinear terms. A number of such proposals have been made over the past few decades. A recently proposed equation based on the assumption that wave function collapse is induced by a sequence of correlating interactions of the kind that constitute measurements has been shown to maintain strict adherence to conservation laws in individual instances, and has also eliminated the need to introduce any new, ad hoc physical constants. In this work it is shone that the proposed stochastic modification to the Schroedinger equation is also Lorentz invariant, even though it is formulated in a preferred reference frame. It is further argued that the additional spacetime structure that the proposed modification requires provides a way to implement the assumption that spacelike-separated operators (and measurements) commute, and that this assumption of local commutativity should be regarded as a third postulate of relativity.
The description of relativistic effects requires a preliminary definition of events localised in space-time while the clocks used for time definition and the fields used in synchronisation or localisation procedures are necessarily quantum systems. We outline an algebraic framework where basic requirements of quantum theory and relativity are consistently dealt with. This approach which may be termed as a `quantum relativity' is built on the algebra of symmetries. It contains the definition of quantum observables associated with Einstein localisation in space-time as well as the evaluation of their commutation relations including the energy-time relation. These commutators also describe the relativistic shifts undergone under frame transformations, not only for inertial frames but also for uniformly accelerated frames. The quantum redshift laws differ from their classical counterparts while still obeying universal metric properties. The paper presents this approach in terms closely connected to the seminal Einstein conception of localisation in space-time and refers to already published papers for more technical developments.
In relativistic quantum field theory the notion of a local operation is regarded as basic: each open space-time region is associated with an algebra of observables representing possible measurements performed within this region. It is much more difficult to accommodate the notions of events taking place in such regions or of localized objects. But how can the notion of a local operation be basic in the theory if this same theory would not be able to represent localized measuring devices and localized events? After briefly reviewing these difficulties we discuss a strategy for eliminating the tension, namely by interpreting quantum theory in a realist way. To implement this strategy we use the ideas of the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics. We then consider the question of whether the resulting scheme can be made Lorentz invariant.