We are in the process of building an experiment to study the tunneling of laser-cooled Rubidium atoms through an optical barrier. A particularly thorny set of questions arises when one considers the possibility of observing a tunneling particle while it is in the ``forbidden'' region. In earlier work, we have discussed how one might probe a tunneling atom ``weakly,'' so as to prevent collapse. Here we make some observations about the implications of a more traditional quantum measurement. Considerations of energy conservation suggest that attempts to observe tunneling atoms will enhance inelastic scattering, but not in a way which can be directly observed. It is possible that attempts to make such measurements may lead to experimentally realizable ``observationally assisted barrier penetration.''
We are in the process of building an experiment to study the tunneling of laser-cooled Rubidium atoms through an optical barrier. A particularly thorny set of questions arises when one considers the possibility of observing a tunneling particle while it is in the forbidden'' region. In earlier work, we have discussed how one might probe a tunneling atom weakly,'' so as to prevent collapse. Here we make some observations about the implications of a more traditional quantum measurement. Considerations of energy conservation suggest that attempts to observe tunneling atoms will enhance inelastic scattering, but not in a way which can be directly observed. It is possible that attempts to make such measurements may lead to experimentally realizable ``observationally assisted barrier penetration.''
Since the early days of quantum mechanics, tunneling has been recognized as one of the hallmarks of the wave character of microscopic physics. The possibility of a quantum particle to penetrate an energetic barrier represents certainly one of the most spectacular implications of quantum theory and has led to various applications in nuclear, atomic, and molecular physics as well as in mesoscopic science. Typical scenarios in which tunneling manifests are the escape route of a quantum particle from a quasibounded region, the transition between two or more symmetry-related, but classically disconnected wells (which we shall focus on in the following), as well as scattering or transport through potential barriers. The spectrum of scenarios becomes even richer when the concept of tunneling is generalized to any kind of classically forbidden transitions in phase space, that is, to transitions that are not necessarily inhibited by static potential barriers but by some other constraints of the underlying classical dynamics (such as integrals of motion). Such “dynamical tunneling” processes arise frequently in molecular systems [1] and were realized with cold atoms propagating in periodically modulated optical lattices [2-4]. Moreover, the electromagnetic analog of dynamical tunneling was also obtained with microwaves in billiards [5].
It is possible in quantum mechanics to sneak quickly across a region which is illegal energetically. Richard Feynman Barrier penetration One of the most startling consequences of de Broglie's wave hypothesis and Schrödinger's equation was the discovery that quantum objects can ‘tunnel’ through potential energy barriers that classical particles are forbidden to penetrate. To gain some idea of what we mean by an energy barrier, let us go back to our roller coaster and look at a larger section of track, as shown in Fig. 5.1. If we start the carriage from rest, high up on the left, at A, and ignore any small frictional energy losses, we know from the conservation of energy that we shall arrive on the other side at the same height we started from, at C. As we went over the little hill B, at the bottom of the valley, the car slowed down as some of our kinetic energy was changed to potential energy in climbing the hill, but because we started much higher up, we had plenty of energy to spare to get us over the top. However, if we started the carriage from rest at A, we do not have enough energy to climb over the hill D and get to E. This is an example of an ‘energy barrier’, and we can say that the region from C to E is ‘classically forbidden’. What is remarkable about quantum ‘particles’ is that they do not behave like these classical objects.
The study of quantum tunneling dates back to the early days of quantum mechanics, and has been a major topic of investigation in both theory and experiment. In recent years, there has been significant effort to understand tunneling phenomena for systems that exhibit chaos in their classical counterpart [13,15,18,29,42]. In particular, tunneling was predicted for mixed systems where chaotic and stable regions are intermingled [14]. The tunneling in this case is between two stable regions (referred to as nonlinear resonances, or islands of stability) in the classical phase space. The classical transport between these islands is forbidden by “dynamical barriers” in phase space. In contrast, quantum tunneling can couple the two islands so that a wave packet oscillates coherently between the two symmetry-related regions. This phenomenon is called dynamical tunneling because it occurs in phase space, without a fixed potential barrier. In the case of a mixed phase space, the presence of the chaotic region can enhance the rate of dynamical tunneling, a phenomenon known as chaos-assisted tunneling [53]. In this chapter, we review our experimental observation of chaosassisted tunneling with ultracold cesium atoms [48-51]. We first give a brief overview of some basic concepts and of earlier work in order to provide a context for our results.
Introduction In classical physics it is meaningful to ask the question, ‘How much time does a particle take to pass through a given region?’ The interesting question in quantum mechanics is: does a particle take a definite time to tunnel through a classically forbidden region? The question has been debated ever since the idea that there was such a time in quantum theory was first put forward by MacColl way back in 1932 [253]. A plethora of times has since then been proposed, and the answer seems to depend on the interpretation of quantum mechanics one uses. A reliable answer is clearly of great importance for the design of high-frequency quantum devices, tunnelling phenomena (as, for example, in scanning tunneling microscopy), nuclear and chemical reactions and, of course, for purely conceptual reasons. Most of the controversies centre around simple and intuitive notions in idealized one-dimensional models in a scattering configuration in which a particle (usually represented by a wave packet) is incident on a potential barrier localized in the interval [ a, b ]. Three kinds of time have been defined in this context. One, called the transmission time τ T ( a, b ), is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually transmitted. Similarly, the reflection time τ R ( a, b ) is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually reflected.
Tunnelling is one of the most paradigmatic and evocative phenomena of quantum physics, underlying processes such as photosynthesis and nuclear fusion, as well as devices ranging from SQUID magnetometers to superconducting qubits for quantum computers. The question of how long a particle takes to tunnel, however, has remained controversial since the first attempts to calculate it, which relied on the group delay. It is now well understood that this delay (the arrival time of the transmitted wave packet peak at the far side of the barrier) can be smaller than the barrier thickness divided by the speed of light, without violating causality. There have been a number of experiments confirming this, and even a recent one claiming that tunnelling may take no time at all. There have also been efforts to identify another timescale, which would better describe how long a given particle spends in the barrier region. Here we present a direct measurement of such a time, studying Bose-condensed 87Rb atoms tunnelling through a 1.3-μm thick optical barrier. By localizing a pseudo-magnetic field inside the barrier, we use the spin precession of the atoms as a clock to measure the time it takes them to cross the classically forbidden region. We find a traversal time of 0.62(7) ms and study its dependence on incident energy. In addition to finally shedding light on the fundamental question of the tunnelling time, this experiment lays the groundwork for addressing deep foundational questions about history in quantum mechanics: for instance, what can we learn about where a particle was at earlier times by observing where it is now?