Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9904070

Against Quantum Noise

ARTUR K. EKERT, Chiara Macchiavello

Published Apr 19, 1999• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

This is a brief description of how to protect quantum states from dissipation and decoherence that arise due to uncontrolled interactions with the environment. We discuss recoherence and stabilisation of quantum states based on two techniques known as "symmetrisation" and "quantum error correction". We illustrate our considerations with the most popular quantum-optical model of the system-environment interaction, commonly used to describe spontaneous emission, and show the benefits of quantum error correction in this case.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9904070

Related papers

Against Quantum Noise

ARTUR K. EKERT, C. Macchiavello

This is a brief description of how to protect quantum states from dissipation and decoherence that arise due to uncontrolled interactions with the environment.We discuss recoherence and stabilization 0f quantum states based on two techniques known as "symmetrization" and "quantum error correction".We illustrate our considerations with the most popular quantum-optical model of the system-environment interaction, commonly used to describe spontaneous emission, and show the benefits of quantum error correction in this case.

Acta Physica Polonica A•Jan 1, 1998•10 citations

Quantum Error Correction

Eduardo R. Mucciolo

All physical systems that provide a good template for the implementation of qubits and quantum gates suffer from some degree of decoherence. The reason is simple: no physical system exists in complete isolation; if it did exist, it would be useless for quantum computing since you would not be able to interact with it! Any physical system, even when well protected, will eventually interact with its environment in a way that we cannot predict or completely control. As a result, coherence, which is essential for quantum information processing, is progressively lost. In the field of quantum computation, it was realized early on that strategies must be employed to mitigate not only imprecisions in the instrumentation but also errors associated to decoherence and relaxation due to interactions with the environment. These strategies, when employed at the quantum circuit level, are called quantum error correction (QEC).

CRC Press eBooks•Aug 6, 2025•0 citations

Quantum error correction

Quantum error correction is a set of methods to protect quantum information--that is, quantum states--from unwanted environmental interactions (decoherence) and other forms of noise. The information is stored in a quantum error-correcting code, which is a subspace in a larger Hilbert space. This code is designed so that the most common errors move the state into an error space orthogonal to the original code space while preserving the information in the state. It is possible to determine whether an error has occurred by a suitable measurement and to apply a unitary correction that returns the state to the code space, without measuring (and hence disturbing) the protected state itself. In general, codewords of a quantum code are entangled states. No code that stores information can protect against all possible errors; instead, codes are designed to correct a specific error set, which should be chosen to match the most likely types of noise. An error set is represented by a set of operators that can multiply the codeword state. Quantum error correction is used to protect information in quantum communication (where quantum states pass through noisy channels) and quantum computation (where quantum states are transformed through a sequence of imperfect computational steps in the presence of environmental decoherence to solve a computational problem). In quantum computation, error correction is just one component of fault-tolerant design.

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Dec 1, 2018•0 citations

Quantum Error Correction

Quantum error correction is a set of methods to protect quantum information--that is, quantum states--from unwanted environmental interactions (decoherence) and other forms of noise. The information is stored in a quantum error-correcting code, which is a subspace in a larger Hilbert space. This code is designed so that the most common errors move the state into an error space orthogonal to the original code space while preserving the information in the state. It is possible to determine whether an error has occurred by a suitable measurement and to apply a unitary correction that returns the state to the code space, without measuring (and hence disturbing) the protected state itself. In general, codewords of a quantum code are entangled states. No code that stores information can protect against all possible errors; instead, codes are designed to correct a specific error set, which should be chosen to match the most likely types of noise. An error set is represented by a set of operators that can multiply the codeword state. Quantum error correction is used to protect information in quantum communication (where quantum states pass through noisy channels) and quantum computation (where quantum states are transformed through a sequence of imperfect computational steps in the presence of environmental decoherence to solve a computational problem). In quantum computation, error correction is just one component of fault-tolerant design.

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Feb 20, 2018•3 citations

Decoherence and Efficiency of Quantum Error Correction

Marek Biskup, Pavel Cejnar, Roman Kotecký

Certain physical aspects of quantum error correction are discussed for a quantum computer (n-qubit register) in contact with a decohering environment. Under rather plausible assumptions upon the form of the computer-environment interaction, the efficiency of a general correcting procedure is evaluated as a function of the spontaneous-decay duration and the rank of errors covered by the procedure. It is proved that the probability of errors can be made arbitrarily small by enhancing the correction method, provided the decohering interaction is represented by a bounded operator.

arXiv:quant-ph/9608010•Aug 8, 1996•1 citation

Quantum Error Detection and Correction

Yorick Hardy, Willi-Hans Steeb

The algorithms discussed in Chapter 21 rely on having isolated systems to store information. In practical applications this is not possible, and the environment interacts with the systems causing decoherence. Suppose the data is contained in the state |x〉, and the environment is described by |E〉. The initial state of the entire system is described by the tensor product of the states |X〉⊗|E〉, which evolves according to some unitary operation U. The state |x〉 evolves according to the unitary operation U x which describes the algorithm. In classical error correction codes, all that needs to be corrected are bit flips (see Chapter 10). In the quantum case errors such as bit flips, phase changes and rotations complicate the error correction techniques. Since arbitrary errors in an encoding of information cannot be corrected, only certain types of errors are assumed to occur (this was also the case in classical error correction, where an upper bound in the number of bits that could be flipped in a transmission was assumed). The types of errors depend on the implementation. For example, suppose the types of errors (which we assume are distinguishable due to an encoding) are described by the unitary basis E 1,...E n , so that all errors are a linear combination [138] E = al.E 1 + ... + a n E n ,...E † E = I.

Birkhäuser Basel eBooks•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations
This is a brief description of how to protect quantum states from dissipation and decoherence that arise due to uncontrolled interactions with the environment. We discuss recoherence and stabilisation of quantum states based on two techniques known as "symmetrisation" and "quantum error correction". We illustrate our considerations with the most popular quantum-optical model of the system-environment interaction, commonly used to describe spontaneous emission, and show the benefits of quantum error correction in this case.
This is a brief description of how to protect quantum states from dissipation and decoherence that arise due to uncontrolled interactions with the environment.We discuss recoherence and stabilization 0f quantum states based on two techniques known as "symmetrization" and "quantum error correction".We illustrate our considerations with the most popular quantum-optical model of the system-environment interaction, commonly used to describe spontaneous emission, and show the benefits of quantum error correction in this case.
All physical systems that provide a good template for the implementation of qubits and quantum gates suffer from some degree of decoherence. The reason is simple: no physical system exists in complete isolation; if it did exist, it would be useless for quantum computing since you would not be able to interact with it! Any physical system, even when well protected, will eventually interact with its environment in a way that we cannot predict or completely control. As a result, coherence, which is essential for quantum information processing, is progressively lost. In the field of quantum computation, it was realized early on that strategies must be employed to mitigate not only imprecisions in the instrumentation but also errors associated to decoherence and relaxation due to interactions with the environment. These strategies, when employed at the quantum circuit level, are called quantum error correction (QEC).
Quantum error correction is a set of methods to protect quantum information--that is, quantum states--from unwanted environmental interactions (decoherence) and other forms of noise. The information is stored in a quantum error-correcting code, which is a subspace in a larger Hilbert space. This code is designed so that the most common errors move the state into an error space orthogonal to the original code space while preserving the information in the state. It is possible to determine whether an error has occurred by a suitable measurement and to apply a unitary correction that returns the state to the code space, without measuring (and hence disturbing) the protected state itself. In general, codewords of a quantum code are entangled states. No code that stores information can protect against all possible errors; instead, codes are designed to correct a specific error set, which should be chosen to match the most likely types of noise. An error set is represented by a set of operators that can multiply the codeword state. Quantum error correction is used to protect information in quantum communication (where quantum states pass through noisy channels) and quantum computation (where quantum states are transformed through a sequence of imperfect computational steps in the presence of environmental decoherence to solve a computational problem). In quantum computation, error correction is just one component of fault-tolerant design.
Quantum error correction is a set of methods to protect quantum information--that is, quantum states--from unwanted environmental interactions (decoherence) and other forms of noise. The information is stored in a quantum error-correcting code, which is a subspace in a larger Hilbert space. This code is designed so that the most common errors move the state into an error space orthogonal to the original code space while preserving the information in the state. It is possible to determine whether an error has occurred by a suitable measurement and to apply a unitary correction that returns the state to the code space, without measuring (and hence disturbing) the protected state itself. In general, codewords of a quantum code are entangled states. No code that stores information can protect against all possible errors; instead, codes are designed to correct a specific error set, which should be chosen to match the most likely types of noise. An error set is represented by a set of operators that can multiply the codeword state. Quantum error correction is used to protect information in quantum communication (where quantum states pass through noisy channels) and quantum computation (where quantum states are transformed through a sequence of imperfect computational steps in the presence of environmental decoherence to solve a computational problem). In quantum computation, error correction is just one component of fault-tolerant design.
Certain physical aspects of quantum error correction are discussed for a quantum computer (n-qubit register) in contact with a decohering environment. Under rather plausible assumptions upon the form of the computer-environment interaction, the efficiency of a general correcting procedure is evaluated as a function of the spontaneous-decay duration and the rank of errors covered by the procedure. It is proved that the probability of errors can be made arbitrarily small by enhancing the correction method, provided the decohering interaction is represented by a bounded operator.
The algorithms discussed in Chapter 21 rely on having isolated systems to store information. In practical applications this is not possible, and the environment interacts with the systems causing decoherence. Suppose the data is contained in the state |x〉, and the environment is described by |E〉. The initial state of the entire system is described by the tensor product of the states |X〉⊗|E〉, which evolves according to some unitary operation U. The state |x〉 evolves according to the unitary operation U x which describes the algorithm. In classical error correction codes, all that needs to be corrected are bit flips (see Chapter 10). In the quantum case errors such as bit flips, phase changes and rotations complicate the error correction techniques. Since arbitrary errors in an encoding of information cannot be corrected, only certain types of errors are assumed to occur (this was also the case in classical error correction, where an upper bound in the number of bits that could be flipped in a transmission was assumed). The types of errors depend on the implementation. For example, suppose the types of errors (which we assume are distinguishable due to an encoding) are described by the unitary basis E 1,...E n , so that all errors are a linear combination [138] E = al.E 1 + ... + a n E n ,...E † E = I.