Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9903087 · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Localizing the relativistic electron

Anthony J. Bracken, G.F. Melloy

Published Aug 13, 1999• 20 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

A causally well-behaved solution of the localization problem for the free electron is given, with natural space-time transformation properties, in terms of Dirac's position operator x . It is shown that, although x is not an observable in the usual sense, and has no positive-energy (generalized) eigenstates, the four-vector density ( ( x , t ), j ( x , t )/ c ) is observable, and can be localized arbitrarily precisely about any point in space, at any instant of time, using only positive-energy states. A suitable spin operator can be diagonalized at the same time.

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/32/34/302

Related papers

Localizing the Relativistic Electron

Anthony J. Bracken, G.F. Melloy

A causally well-behaved solution of the localization problem for the free electron is given, with natural space-time transformation properties, in terms of Dirac’s position operator x. It is shown that, although x is not an observable in the usual sense, and has no positive-energy (generalized) eigenstates, the 4-vector density (ρ(x,t),j(x,t)/c) is observable, and can be localized arbitrarily precisely about any point in space, at any instant of time, using only positive-energy states. A suitable spin operator can be diagonalized at the same time. 1

•Mar 31, 1999•12 citations

Aspects of particle localisation in quantum mechanics

G.F. Melloy

The concept of position is a basic one in our construction of a model of thenphysical world: yet the theory of localisation in quantum mechanics is fraughtnwith difficulties, especially in the relativistic case. A strictly localised state forna nonrelativistic particle cannot be described by an ordinary function. In thenrelativistic case the problems are manifold. For a free electron, using the Diracnposition operator x, we cannot construct positive-energy states which localisenthe particle within a compact region. Furthermore it has been suggested that anconsistent one-particle description of localisation on a scale small compared tonthe Compton wavelength of the particle is ruled out because pair-productionnwould take place. These matters are dicussed at greater length in Chaptern1, where several proposed localisation schemes (that is, sets of definitions ofnlocalised states and position operators) are reviewed: none of these is deemednwholly satisfactory. Introductory remarks are also made in this chapter aboutnthe remarkable phenomenon of 'probability backflow', which is discussed further below, and which is relevant to our discussion of localisation.In Chapter 2 we show that while strict localisation of the free Dirac particle is not describable within the usual mathematical formalism, in terms of Dirac's position operator x it is possible to describe sequences of positive-energy states whose spread Dx = ((x -- x0)2) about a point X0 approaches zero.In Chapter 3 the component states of these sequences are used as the basis of a full causally well-behaved solution to the localisation problem for the free electron, with natural space-time transformation properties. It is shown that although x is not an observable in the usual sense, the four-vector density (p(x, t), j(x, t)/c) is observable, and can be localised arbitrarily precisely about any point in space, at any instant of time, using only positive-energy states. A suitable spin operator can be diagonalised at the same time.n n

•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

Representation of the causal logic for the Dirac system and the electron

Domenico P. L. Castrigiano, Carmine De Rosa, Valter Moretti

We construct a covariant representation of the causal logic for the Dirac system and the electron, based on the conserved Dirac probability current and a general current-to-localization procedure for achronal regions. A polynomial decay estimate, derived by a non-stationary phase argument, verifies the conditions required to define covariant achronal localization for the full Dirac system. Extending this localization to complete spacetime regions yields the corresponding causal-logic representation; restriction to the positive-energy invariant subspace gives the analogous construction for the electron. We establish several structural properties. On Euclidean space, Dirac localization agrees with canonical projection-valued localization, while its position operator differs from the Newton--Wigner operator by an explicitly determined bounded self-adjoint correction. Full Dirac achronal localization is projection valued and represents achronal separateness by orthogonality, thus satisfying microscopic causality. After compression to the electron subspace, it becomes positive-operator valued while preserving causality. We further extend known results from spatial to general achronal regions, prove separation and norm-one criteria, and analyze the high-boost limit, obtaining Lorentz contraction in a precise probabilistic sense. Finally, we discuss the electron--positron decomposition and the state transformation induced by position measurements, showing that measurement-induced positron production is universal and independent of the specific measuring device.

math-phCross-listedarXiv:2607.21266•Jul 24, 2026•0 citations

Operator density current and relativistic localization problem

Bernard Jancewicz

The well-known difficulties with the relativistic localization in quantum theory of one particle are revisited. Among them the noncausal propagation is shown to be connected with the positivity of the time translations generator. A proposal for solving this problem is presented, namely searching for an operator probability density current being the 4-vector quantity. The operator of multiplication by the argument of the Dirac wavefunction is an example of a causal position operator.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 1977•12 citations

Lorentz-Invariant Localization for Elementary Systems. II

Andrés J. Kálnay

The purpose of this paper is to find to what extent the notion of position in the relativistic quantum mechanics of free elementary systems of nonzero mass is defined (or precluded) by the requirement that the descriptions of a localized state as seen from two observers in different frames of reference should be physically consistent. Neither the existence of a time component of the position operator nor the compatibility of the space components of position is assumed. Hermiticity with respect to the quantum-relativistic scalar product in state-vector space is neither assumed nor rejected. There are three possibilities: (i) The position is represented as usual by a Hermitian operator; this is the point-type position. (ii) Non-Hermitian operators are accepted, and the $k$ component of position can represent segments of the $k$ axis with length of the order of $\frac{1}{m}$; when the operator is not only non-Hermitian, but also non-normal, this is the extended-type position. (iii) Non-Hermitian operators are accepted, but the segments are reduced to points; this is the limiting case of the extended-type position. Case (ii) is not studied in this paper. General conditions are found for any spin as regards cases (i) and (iii), and their consequences are obtained for spin 0 and spin \textonehalf{}. The results are the following: There is no position operator in case (i), but in case (iii) the position operator is unique for spin 0 and unique up to a parameter for spin \textonehalf{}. For both spins, in spite of the lack of relativistic Hermiticity, the eigenvalues of position are real, and the velocity is the expected one. The eigenstates of one component of the position are found. The components of the position are compatible with each other for spin 0, and incompatible for spin \textonehalf{}. In the former case, the simultaneous eigenstates of all components are Philip's class-I localized states. Related work is discussed.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Feb 15, 1970•27 citations

Relativistic Mechanics Theory for Electrons that Exhibits Spin, Zitterbewegung, Superposition and Produces Dirac's Wave Equation

James L. Beck

A neo-classical relativistic mechanics theory is presented where the spin of an electron is a natural part of its space-time path as a point particle. The fourth-order equation of motion corresponds to the same Lagrangian function in proper time as in special relativity except for an additional spin energy term. The total motion can be decomposed into a sum of a local spin motion about a point and a global motion of this point, called the spin center. The global motion is sub-luminal and obeys Newton's second law in proper time, the time for a clock fixed at the spin center, while the total motion occurs at the speed of light c, consistent with the eigenvalues of Dirac's velocity operators having magnitude c. The local spin motion corresponds to Schrödinger's zitterbewegung and is a perpetual motion, which for a free electron has a circular path in the spin-center frame. In an electro-magnetic field, this spin motion generates magnetic and electric dipole energies through the Lorentz force on the electron's point charge. The corresponding electric dipole energy is consistent with the spin-orbit coupling term in the corrected Pauli non-relativistic Hamiltonian but the magnetic dipole energy is one half of that in Dirac's theory. By defining a spin tensor as the angular momentum of the electron's total motion about its spin center, the fundamental equations of motion can be re-written in an identical form to those of the Barut-Zanghi electron theory. These equations of motion can then be expressed using operators applied to a state function of proper time satisfying a Dirac-Schrödinger spinor equation. The operators produce dynamic variables without any probability implications. For the free electron, the state function satisfies Dirac's relativistic wave equation when the Lorentz transformation is applied to express proper time in terms of an observer's space-time coordinates.

arXiv:2108.07267•Aug 14, 2021•2 citations
A causally well-behaved solution of the localization problem for the free electron is given, with natural space-time transformation properties, in terms of Dirac's position operator x . It is shown that, although x is not an observable in the usual sense, and has no positive-energy (generalized) eigenstates, the four-vector density ( ( x , t ), j ( x , t )/ c ) is observable, and can be localized arbitrarily precisely about any point in space, at any instant of time, using only positive-energy states. A suitable spin operator can be diagonalized at the same time.
A causally well-behaved solution of the localization problem for the free electron is given, with natural space-time transformation properties, in terms of Dirac’s position operator x. It is shown that, although x is not an observable in the usual sense, and has no positive-energy (generalized) eigenstates, the 4-vector density (ρ(x,t),j(x,t)/c) is observable, and can be localized arbitrarily precisely about any point in space, at any instant of time, using only positive-energy states. A suitable spin operator can be diagonalized at the same time. 1
The concept of position is a basic one in our construction of a model of thenphysical world: yet the theory of localisation in quantum mechanics is fraughtnwith difficulties, especially in the relativistic case. A strictly localised state forna nonrelativistic particle cannot be described by an ordinary function. In thenrelativistic case the problems are manifold. For a free electron, using the Diracnposition operator x, we cannot construct positive-energy states which localisenthe particle within a compact region. Furthermore it has been suggested that anconsistent one-particle description of localisation on a scale small compared tonthe Compton wavelength of the particle is ruled out because pair-productionnwould take place. These matters are dicussed at greater length in Chaptern1, where several proposed localisation schemes (that is, sets of definitions ofnlocalised states and position operators) are reviewed: none of these is deemednwholly satisfactory. Introductory remarks are also made in this chapter aboutnthe remarkable phenomenon of 'probability backflow', which is discussed further below, and which is relevant to our discussion of localisation.In Chapter 2 we show that while strict localisation of the free Dirac particle is not describable within the usual mathematical formalism, in terms of Dirac's position operator x it is possible to describe sequences of positive-energy states whose spread Dx = ((x -- x0)2) about a point X0 approaches zero.In Chapter 3 the component states of these sequences are used as the basis of a full causally well-behaved solution to the localisation problem for the free electron, with natural space-time transformation properties. It is shown that although x is not an observable in the usual sense, the four-vector density (p(x, t), j(x, t)/c) is observable, and can be localised arbitrarily precisely about any point in space, at any instant of time, using only positive-energy states. A suitable spin operator can be diagonalised at the same time.n n
We construct a covariant representation of the causal logic for the Dirac system and the electron, based on the conserved Dirac probability current and a general current-to-localization procedure for achronal regions. A polynomial decay estimate, derived by a non-stationary phase argument, verifies the conditions required to define covariant achronal localization for the full Dirac system. Extending this localization to complete spacetime regions yields the corresponding causal-logic representation; restriction to the positive-energy invariant subspace gives the analogous construction for the electron. We establish several structural properties. On Euclidean space, Dirac localization agrees with canonical projection-valued localization, while its position operator differs from the Newton--Wigner operator by an explicitly determined bounded self-adjoint correction. Full Dirac achronal localization is projection valued and represents achronal separateness by orthogonality, thus satisfying microscopic causality. After compression to the electron subspace, it becomes positive-operator valued while preserving causality. We further extend known results from spatial to general achronal regions, prove separation and norm-one criteria, and analyze the high-boost limit, obtaining Lorentz contraction in a precise probabilistic sense. Finally, we discuss the electron--positron decomposition and the state transformation induced by position measurements, showing that measurement-induced positron production is universal and independent of the specific measuring device.
The purpose of this paper is to find to what extent the notion of position in the relativistic quantum mechanics of free elementary systems of nonzero mass is defined (or precluded) by the requirement that the descriptions of a localized state as seen from two observers in different frames of reference should be physically consistent. Neither the existence of a time component of the position operator nor the compatibility of the space components of position is assumed. Hermiticity with respect to the quantum-relativistic scalar product in state-vector space is neither assumed nor rejected. There are three possibilities: (i) The position is represented as usual by a Hermitian operator; this is the point-type position. (ii) Non-Hermitian operators are accepted, and the kkk component of position can represent segments of the kkk axis with length of the order of 1m\frac{1}{m}m1​; when the operator is not only non-Hermitian, but also non-normal, this is the extended-type position. (iii) Non-Hermitian operators are accepted, but the segments are reduced to points; this is the limiting case of the extended-type position. Case (ii) is not studied in this paper. General conditions are found for any spin as regards cases (i) and (iii), and their consequences are obtained for spin 0 and spin \textonehalf{}. The results are the following: There is no position operator in case (i), but in case (iii) the position operator is unique for spin 0 and unique up to a parameter for spin \textonehalf{}. For both spins, in spite of the lack of relativistic Hermiticity, the eigenvalues of position are real, and the velocity is the expected one. The eigenstates of one component of the position are found. The components of the position are compatible with each other for spin 0, and incompatible for spin \textonehalf{}. In the former case, the simultaneous eigenstates of all components are Philip's class-I localized states. Related work is discussed.
A neo-classical relativistic mechanics theory is presented where the spin of an electron is a natural part of its space-time path as a point particle. The fourth-order equation of motion corresponds to the same Lagrangian function in proper time as in special relativity except for an additional spin energy term. The total motion can be decomposed into a sum of a local spin motion about a point and a global motion of this point, called the spin center. The global motion is sub-luminal and obeys Newton's second law in proper time, the time for a clock fixed at the spin center, while the total motion occurs at the speed of light c, consistent with the eigenvalues of Dirac's velocity operators having magnitude c. The local spin motion corresponds to Schrödinger's zitterbewegung and is a perpetual motion, which for a free electron has a circular path in the spin-center frame. In an electro-magnetic field, this spin motion generates magnetic and electric dipole energies through the Lorentz force on the electron's point charge. The corresponding electric dipole energy is consistent with the spin-orbit coupling term in the corrected Pauli non-relativistic Hamiltonian but the magnetic dipole energy is one half of that in Dirac's theory. By defining a spin tensor as the angular momentum of the electron's total motion about its spin center, the fundamental equations of motion can be re-written in an identical form to those of the Barut-Zanghi electron theory. These equations of motion can then be expressed using operators applied to a state function of proper time satisfying a Dirac-Schrödinger spinor equation. The operators produce dynamic variables without any probability implications. For the free electron, the state function satisfies Dirac's relativistic wave equation when the Lorentz transformation is applied to express proper time in terms of an observer's space-time coordinates.