Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9810041 · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

Do Dynamical Reduction Models Imply that Arithmetic Does Not Apply to Ordinary Macroscopic Objects?

G. C. Ghirardi, Angelo Bassi

Published Mar 1, 1999• 23 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We analyse a recent paper in which an alleged devastating criticism of the so called GRW proposal to account for the objectification of the properties of macroscopic systems has been presented and we show that the author has not taken into account the precise implications of the GRW theory. This fact makes his conclusions basically wrong. We also perform a survey of measurement theory aimed to focus better on the physical and the conceptual aspects of the so-called macro-objectification problem.

DOI
10.1093/bjps/50.1.49

Related papers

More about Dynamical Reduction and the Enumeration Principle

Angelo Bassi, G. C. Ghirardi

In view of the arguments put forward by Clifton and Monton [this volume], we reconsider the alleged conflict of dynamical reduction models with the enumeration principle. We prove that our original analysis of such a problem is correct, that the GRW model does not meet any difficulty and that the reasoning of the above authors is inappropriate since it does not take into account the correct interpretation of the dynamical reduction theories.

arXiv:quant-ph/9907050•The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•Dec 1, 1999•41 citations

A General Argument Against the Universal Validity of the Superposition Principle

Angelo Bassi, G. C. Ghirardi

We reconsider a well known problem of quantum theory, i.e. the so called measurement (or macro-objectification) problem, and we rederive the fact that it gives rise to serious problems of interpretation. The novelty of our approach derives from the fact that the relevant conclusion is obtained in a completely general way, in particular, without resorting to any of the assumptions of ideality which are usually done for the measurement process. The generality and unescapability of our assumptions (we take into account possible malfunctionings of the apparatus, its unavoidable entanglement with the environmment, its high but not absolute reliability, its fundamentally uncontrollable features) allow to draw the conclusion that the very possibility of performing measurements on a microsystem combined with the assumed general validity of the linear nature of quantum evolution leads to a fundamental contradiction.

•Jan 1, 2000•68 citations

Dynamical Reduction Models

Angelo Bassi, GianCarlo Ghirardi

The report presents an exhaustive review of the recent attempt to overcome the difficulties that standard quantum mechanics meets in accounting for the measurement (or macro-objectification) problem, an attempt based on the consideration of nonlinear and stochastic modifications of the Schroedinger equation. The proposed new dynamics is characterized by the feature of not contradicting any known fact about microsystems and of accounting, on the basis of a unique, universal dynamical principle, for wavepacket reduction and for the classical behavior of macroscopic systems. We recall the motivations for the new approach and we briefly review the other proposals to circumvent the above mentioned difficulties which appeared in the literature. In this way we make clear the conceptual and historical context characterizing the new approach. After having reviewed the mathematical techniques (stochastic differential calculus) which are essential for the rigorous and precise formulation of the new dynamics, we discuss in great detail its implications and we stress its relevant conceptual achievements. The new proposal requires also to work out an appropriate interpretation; a procedure which leads us to a reconsideration of many important issues about the conceptual status of theories based on a genuinely Hilbert space description of natural processes. We also discuss the possibility and the problems one meets in trying to develop an analogous formalism for the relativistic case. Finally we discuss the experimental implications of the new dynamics for various physical processes which should allow, in principle, to test it against quantum mechanics.

•Jan 1, 2003•490 citations

Some reflections inspired by my research activity in quantum mechanics

G. C. Ghirardi

By taking advantage of my long lasting research activity on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics I reconsider some of the basic problems which have been at the centre of the recent debate on this theory. Specific attention is given to topics like quantum nonlocality, the impossibility of faster than light communication and the so-called measurement or macro-objectification problem. A large part of the paper deals with the dynamical reduction program and discusses its merits and achievements, as well as its limitations. The above considerations lead me in a natural way to express my personal views on the present status of the foundational studies.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Mar 7, 2007•12 citations

Theory of Measurement in Quantum Mechanics

Saburo Amai

The question as to whether quantum mechanics can be applied to a macroscopic system, which has recently been raised through discussions of the problem of how to interpret the so-called “reduction of a wave packet”, is discussed. It is shown by a detailed analysis of the destruction of interference which brings about the reduction, that a supplementary assumption on the preciseness of measurements must at least be introduced in order to interpret the reduction process as an objective process, and it does not, however, necessarily imply inapplicability of quantum mechanics to a macroscopic system.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Oct 1, 1963•4 citations

Quantum Mechanics, Orthogonality, and Counting

Peter J. Lewis

In quantum mechanics it is usually assumed that mutually exclusives states of affairs must be represented by orthogonal vectors. Recent attempts to solve the measurement problem, most notably the GRW theory, require the relaxation of this assumption. It is shown that a consequence of relaxing this assumption is that arithmatic does not apply to ordinary macroscopic objects. It is argued that such a radical move is unwarranted given the current state of understanding of the foundations of quantum mechanics.

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•Sep 1, 1997•56 citations
We analyse a recent paper in which an alleged devastating criticism of the so called GRW proposal to account for the objectification of the properties of macroscopic systems has been presented and we show that the author has not taken into account the precise implications of the GRW theory. This fact makes his conclusions basically wrong. We also perform a survey of measurement theory aimed to focus better on the physical and the conceptual aspects of the so-called macro-objectification problem.
We reconsider a well known problem of quantum theory, i.e. the so called measurement (or macro-objectification) problem, and we rederive the fact that it gives rise to serious problems of interpretation. The novelty of our approach derives from the fact that the relevant conclusion is obtained in a completely general way, in particular, without resorting to any of the assumptions of ideality which are usually done for the measurement process. The generality and unescapability of our assumptions (we take into account possible malfunctionings of the apparatus, its unavoidable entanglement with the environmment, its high but not absolute reliability, its fundamentally uncontrollable features) allow to draw the conclusion that the very possibility of performing measurements on a microsystem combined with the assumed general validity of the linear nature of quantum evolution leads to a fundamental contradiction.
The report presents an exhaustive review of the recent attempt to overcome the difficulties that standard quantum mechanics meets in accounting for the measurement (or macro-objectification) problem, an attempt based on the consideration of nonlinear and stochastic modifications of the Schroedinger equation. The proposed new dynamics is characterized by the feature of not contradicting any known fact about microsystems and of accounting, on the basis of a unique, universal dynamical principle, for wavepacket reduction and for the classical behavior of macroscopic systems. We recall the motivations for the new approach and we briefly review the other proposals to circumvent the above mentioned difficulties which appeared in the literature. In this way we make clear the conceptual and historical context characterizing the new approach. After having reviewed the mathematical techniques (stochastic differential calculus) which are essential for the rigorous and precise formulation of the new dynamics, we discuss in great detail its implications and we stress its relevant conceptual achievements. The new proposal requires also to work out an appropriate interpretation; a procedure which leads us to a reconsideration of many important issues about the conceptual status of theories based on a genuinely Hilbert space description of natural processes. We also discuss the possibility and the problems one meets in trying to develop an analogous formalism for the relativistic case. Finally we discuss the experimental implications of the new dynamics for various physical processes which should allow, in principle, to test it against quantum mechanics.
By taking advantage of my long lasting research activity on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics I reconsider some of the basic problems which have been at the centre of the recent debate on this theory. Specific attention is given to topics like quantum nonlocality, the impossibility of faster than light communication and the so-called measurement or macro-objectification problem. A large part of the paper deals with the dynamical reduction program and discusses its merits and achievements, as well as its limitations. The above considerations lead me in a natural way to express my personal views on the present status of the foundational studies.
The question as to whether quantum mechanics can be applied to a macroscopic system, which has recently been raised through discussions of the problem of how to interpret the so-called “reduction of a wave packet”, is discussed. It is shown by a detailed analysis of the destruction of interference which brings about the reduction, that a supplementary assumption on the preciseness of measurements must at least be introduced in order to interpret the reduction process as an objective process, and it does not, however, necessarily imply inapplicability of quantum mechanics to a macroscopic system.
In quantum mechanics it is usually assumed that mutually exclusives states of affairs must be represented by orthogonal vectors. Recent attempts to solve the measurement problem, most notably the GRW theory, require the relaxation of this assumption. It is shown that a consequence of relaxing this assumption is that arithmatic does not apply to ordinary macroscopic objects. It is argued that such a radical move is unwarranted given the current state of understanding of the foundations of quantum mechanics.