© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9807005 · International Journal of Modern Physics B

A NOTE ON (SPIN-) COHERENT-STATE PATH INTEGRAL

Junya Shibata, Shin Takagi

Published Jan 20, 1999• 25 citations

Abstract

It is pointed out that there are some fundamental difficulties with the frequently used continuous-time formalism of the spin-coherent-state path integral. They arise already in a single-spin system and at the level of the "classical action" not to speak of fluctuations around the "classical path". Similar difficulties turn out to be present in the case of the (boson-)coherent-state path integral as well; although partially circumventable by an ingenious trick (Klauder's ∊-prescription) at the "classical level", they manifest themselves at the level of fluctuations. Detailed analysis of the origin of these difficulties makes it clear that the only way of avoiding them is to work with the proper discrete-time formalism. The thesis is explicitly illustrated with a harmonic oscillator and a spin under a constant magnetic field.

DOI: 10.1142/s0217979299000096

Related papers

Coherent State Path Integral for the Harmonic Oscillator and a Spin Particle in a Constant Magnetic field

Mario Bergeron

Definition and formulas for harmonic oscillator coherent states and spin coherent states are reviewed in detail. The path integral formalism and its relation with the partition function of a system are also reviewed. The harmonic oscillator coherent state path integral is evaluated exactly at the discrete level and then used to find its continuum limit using various regularizations. The computation of the path integral for a particle of spin s put in a constant magnetic field is carried out using harmonic oscillator coherent states and spin coherent states, with a careful analysis of infinitesimal terms (in 1/N where N is the number of time slices) appearing in the Lagrangian. A mapping of the spin system into a CP1 model is shown explicitly. The theory of a spinless particle in the field of a magnetic monopole and its relation with the spin system are explained. The equivalence of these two models is established up to infinitesimal order by the introduction of an external field correction. This gives a new representation of a coherent state path integral in terms of a more familiar Feynman path integral.

Fortschritte der Physik/Progress of Physics•Jan 1, 1992•11 citations

PERIODIC COHERENT STATES AND A PATH INTEGRAL FOR SPINS

Tarō Kashiwa

A path integral formalism for quantum spins is discussed with the aid of a new coherent state. Under the study, we can see the reason why the path integral formula proposed recently by Nielsen and Rohrlich works so well and the origin of the parameter in their formula. A generalization to the case where spin magnitude is unfixed is also presented.

International Journal of Modern Physics A•Jan 20, 1990•10 citations

An investigation of coherent state path integrals as applied to a harmonic oscillator and a single spin

L. C. Lew Yan Voon

In this project two steps involved in the handling of path integrals are reexamined in detail for coherent state path integals. They concern the continuum limit approximation and the regularization of the formal path integrals. Restricting oneself to the harmonic oscillator, the technique of time splitting is used to set up the coherent state path integrals and the proper way to pass to the continuum limit is demonstrated. The manipulation of these path integrals calls for regularization procedures and the validity of discrete, Riemann zeta function and 'derivative' regularization methods is observed. A modification to a fermionic theory is briefly mentioned and, finally, the above results are implemented in writing down a path integral for a single spin.

•Jan 1, 2010•2 citations

Breakdown of the Coherent State Path Integral: Two Simple Examples

Justin H. Wilson, Victor M. Galitski

We show how the time-continuous coherent state path integral breaks down for both the single-site Bose-Hubbard model and the spin-path integral. Specifically, when the Hamiltonian is quadratic in a generator of the algebra used to construct coherent states, the path integral fails to produce correct results following from an operator approach. As suggested by previous authors, we note that the problems do not arise in the time-discretized version of the path integral.

arXiv:1012.1328•Physical Review Letters•Mar 16, 2011•36 citations

Making the coherent state path integral great again: insights from stochastic calculus

Adam Rançon

Recently, doubts have been cast on the validity of the continuous-time coherent state path integral. This has led to controversies regarding the correct way of performing calculations with path integrals, and to several alternative definitions of what should be their continuous limit. Furthermore, the issue of a supposedly proper ordering of the Hamiltonian operator, entangled with the continuous-time limit, has led to considerable confusion in the literature. Since coherent state path integrals are at the basis of the modern formulation of many-body quantum theory, it should be laid on solid foundations. Here, we show that the standard coherent state path integral is fine as it is, and does not need any modification. We show that the issues raised above are coming from illegitimate use of the (standard) rules of calculus, which are not necessarily valid in path integrals. This is well known in the context of stochastic equations, in particular in their path integral formulation. This insight allows for solving these issues, and addressing the correspondence between the various orderings at the level of the path integral. We also use this opportunity to address the proper calculation of a functional determinant in the presence of a Hubbard-Stratonovich field, which shares in the controversies.

•Jun 6, 2019•0 citations

Coherent-state path integrals in the continuum: The SU(2) case

G. Kordas, Dimitrios Kalantzis, A. I. Karanikas

We define the time-continuous spin coherent-state path integral in a way that is free from inconsistencies. The proposed definition is used to reproduce known exact results. Such a formalism opens new possibilities for applying approximations with improved accuracy and can be proven useful in a great variety of problems where spin Hamiltonians are used.

arXiv:1605.06757•May 22, 2016•1 citation

It is pointed out that there are some fundamental difficulties with the frequently used continuous-time formalism of the spin-coherent-state path integral. They arise already in a single-spin system and at the level of the "classical action" not to speak of fluctuations around the "classical path". Similar difficulties turn out to be present in the case of the (boson-)coherent-state path integral as well; although partially circumventable by an ingenious trick (Klauder's ∊-prescription) at the "classical level", they manifest themselves at the level of fluctuations. Detailed analysis of the origin of these difficulties makes it clear that the only way of avoiding them is to work with the proper discrete-time formalism. The thesis is explicitly illustrated with a harmonic oscillator and a spin under a constant magnetic field.

Definition and formulas for harmonic oscillator coherent states and spin coherent states are reviewed in detail. The path integral formalism and its relation with the partition function of a system are also reviewed. The harmonic oscillator coherent state path integral is evaluated exactly at the discrete level and then used to find its continuum limit using various regularizations. The computation of the path integral for a particle of spin s put in a constant magnetic field is carried out using harmonic oscillator coherent states and spin coherent states, with a careful analysis of infinitesimal terms (in 1/N where N is the number of time slices) appearing in the Lagrangian. A mapping of the spin system into a CP1 model is shown explicitly. The theory of a spinless particle in the field of a magnetic monopole and its relation with the spin system are explained. The equivalence of these two models is established up to infinitesimal order by the introduction of an external field correction. This gives a new representation of a coherent state path integral in terms of a more familiar Feynman path integral.

In this project two steps involved in the handling of path integrals are reexamined in detail for coherent state path integals. They concern the continuum limit approximation and the regularization of the formal path integrals. Restricting oneself to the harmonic oscillator, the technique of time splitting is used to set up the coherent state path integrals and the proper way to pass to the continuum limit is demonstrated. The manipulation of these path integrals calls for regularization procedures and the validity of discrete, Riemann zeta function and 'derivative' regularization methods is observed. A modification to a fermionic theory is briefly mentioned and, finally, the above results are implemented in writing down a path integral for a single spin.

Recently, doubts have been cast on the validity of the continuous-time coherent state path integral. This has led to controversies regarding the correct way of performing calculations with path integrals, and to several alternative definitions of what should be their continuous limit. Furthermore, the issue of a supposedly proper ordering of the Hamiltonian operator, entangled with the continuous-time limit, has led to considerable confusion in the literature. Since coherent state path integrals are at the basis of the modern formulation of many-body quantum theory, it should be laid on solid foundations. Here, we show that the standard coherent state path integral is fine as it is, and does not need any modification. We show that the issues raised above are coming from illegitimate use of the (standard) rules of calculus, which are not necessarily valid in path integrals. This is well known in the context of stochastic equations, in particular in their path integral formulation. This insight allows for solving these issues, and addressing the correspondence between the various orderings at the level of the path integral. We also use this opportunity to address the proper calculation of a functional determinant in the presence of a Hubbard-Stratonovich field, which shares in the controversies.