Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9806060

Operator Formulation of Classical Mechanics and the Problem of Measurement

Slobodan Prvanović, Z. Marić

Published Jun 18, 1998• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The basic concepts of classical mechanics are given in the operator form. The dynamical equation for a hybrid system, consisting of quantum and classical subsystems, is introduced and analyzed in the case of an ideal nonselective measurement. The nondeterministic evolution is found to be the consequence of the superposition of two different deterministic evolutions.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9806060

Related papers

Toward the Collapse of State

Slobodan Prvanović, Z. Marić, Belgrade +1 more

The basic concepts of classical mechanics are given in the operator form. Then, the hybrid systems approach, with the operator formulation of both quantum and classical sector, is applied to the case of an ideal nonselective measurement. It is found that the dynamical equation, consisting of the Schrödinger and Liouville dynamics, produces noncausal evolution when the initial state of measured system and measuring apparatus is chosen to be as it is demanded in discussions regarding the problem of measurement. Nonuniqueness of possible realizations of transition from pure noncorrelated to mixed correlated state is analyzed in details. It is concluded that collapse of state is the only possible way of evolution of physical systems in this case.

arXiv:quant-ph/9910020•Oct 5, 1999•0 citations

The measurement problem in the stochastic formulation of quantum mechanics.

Blanchard Ph, Cini M, Maurizio Serva

The description of physical systems obtained in the classical limit of quantum mechanics is not consistent with the one given by classical statistical mechanics. In qantum mechanics the complete description of a physical system is given by specifying the wave function, which evolves completely deterministically. Probability comes into play only when a measurement is made. Classical statistical mechanics, on the contrary, concerns systems whose description is not complete and where probability enters as a consequence of a lack of knowledge. We show that Nelson's stochastic mechanics, whose predictions are identical with those of quantum mechanics, provides nevertheless a unified description of the deterministic and random aspects of quantum mechanics which eliminates the inconsistency outlined above and gives a simple and satisfactory solution to the measurement problem.

•Jan 1, 1992•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics with Spontaneous Localization

T. Weber

One of the fundamental conceptual difficulties in quantum mechanics arises from the fact that two of the axioms of the theory concerning the evolution of a microscopic system are contradictory. The first axiom assumes that the state of a quantum system evolving undisturbed by any observer obeys a linear deterministic law expressed by the SchrSdinger equation. The second one (wave-packet reduction principle) states that, when the quantum system interacts with an apparatus devised to measure some of its dynamical variables, its state changes abruptly and stochastically, jumping into a normalized eigenstate of the measured variable. This evolution is not deterministic nor linear and cannot be accounted for by the SchrSdinger equation. As a consequence the internal coherence of the theory becomes questionable. On one side the influence of the apparatus on the quantum system cannot be described as an interaction of the quantum constituents of the measuring macroscopic apparatus with the measured quantum system. On the other side, the impossibility of considering a macroscopic object as made by quantum constituents, i .e . the difficulty of quantum mechanics in describing the behaviour of macroscopic systems, is even more dramatic if we consider the evolution of the closed system consisting of the macroscopic apparatus and of the microscopic system. In such a case the appearance of superpositions of macr0scopically distinguishable states related to the apparatus cannot be avoided. These superpositions contradict both our classical experience and wave-packet reduction principle, which provides for statistical mixtures.

•Jan 1, 1991•0 citations

Hybrid quantum-classical master equations

Lajos Diósi

We discuss hybrid master equations of composite systems which are hybrids of classical and quantum subsystems. A fairly general form of hybrid master equations is suggested, its consistency is derived from the consistency of Lindblad quantum master equations. We emphasize that quantum measurement is a natural example of exact hybrid systems. We derive a heuristic hybrid master equation of time-continuous position measurement (monitoring).

•Jan 1, 2014•30 citations

Hybrid quantum-classical master equations

Lajos Diósi

We discuss hybrid master equations of composite systems, which are hybrids of classical and quantum subsystems. A fairly general form of hybrid master equations is suggested. Its consistency is derived from the consistency of Lindblad quantum master equations. We emphasize that quantum measurement is a natural example of exact hybrid systems. We derive a heuristic hybrid master equation of time-continuous position measurement (monitoring).

arXiv:1401.0476•Physica Scripta•Dec 1, 2014•42 citations

Consistent measurement of a quantum dynamical variable using classical apparatus

E. C. G. Sudarshan

The claim that there is an inconsistency of quantum-classical dynamics [1] is investigated. We point out that a consistent formulation of quantum and classical dynamics which can be used to describe quantum measurement processes is already available in the literature [2]. An example in which a quantum system is interacting with a classical system is worked out using this formulation.

arXiv:quant-ph/0402134•Feb 18, 2004•4 citations
The basic concepts of classical mechanics are given in the operator form. The dynamical equation for a hybrid system, consisting of quantum and classical subsystems, is introduced and analyzed in the case of an ideal nonselective measurement. The nondeterministic evolution is found to be the consequence of the superposition of two different deterministic evolutions.
The basic concepts of classical mechanics are given in the operator form. Then, the hybrid systems approach, with the operator formulation of both quantum and classical sector, is applied to the case of an ideal nonselective measurement. It is found that the dynamical equation, consisting of the Schrödinger and Liouville dynamics, produces noncausal evolution when the initial state of measured system and measuring apparatus is chosen to be as it is demanded in discussions regarding the problem of measurement. Nonuniqueness of possible realizations of transition from pure noncorrelated to mixed correlated state is analyzed in details. It is concluded that collapse of state is the only possible way of evolution of physical systems in this case.
The description of physical systems obtained in the classical limit of quantum mechanics is not consistent with the one given by classical statistical mechanics. In qantum mechanics the complete description of a physical system is given by specifying the wave function, which evolves completely deterministically. Probability comes into play only when a measurement is made. Classical statistical mechanics, on the contrary, concerns systems whose description is not complete and where probability enters as a consequence of a lack of knowledge. We show that Nelson's stochastic mechanics, whose predictions are identical with those of quantum mechanics, provides nevertheless a unified description of the deterministic and random aspects of quantum mechanics which eliminates the inconsistency outlined above and gives a simple and satisfactory solution to the measurement problem.
One of the fundamental conceptual difficulties in quantum mechanics arises from the fact that two of the axioms of the theory concerning the evolution of a microscopic system are contradictory. The first axiom assumes that the state of a quantum system evolving undisturbed by any observer obeys a linear deterministic law expressed by the SchrSdinger equation. The second one (wave-packet reduction principle) states that, when the quantum system interacts with an apparatus devised to measure some of its dynamical variables, its state changes abruptly and stochastically, jumping into a normalized eigenstate of the measured variable. This evolution is not deterministic nor linear and cannot be accounted for by the SchrSdinger equation. As a consequence the internal coherence of the theory becomes questionable. On one side the influence of the apparatus on the quantum system cannot be described as an interaction of the quantum constituents of the measuring macroscopic apparatus with the measured quantum system. On the other side, the impossibility of considering a macroscopic object as made by quantum constituents, i .e . the difficulty of quantum mechanics in describing the behaviour of macroscopic systems, is even more dramatic if we consider the evolution of the closed system consisting of the macroscopic apparatus and of the microscopic system. In such a case the appearance of superpositions of macr0scopically distinguishable states related to the apparatus cannot be avoided. These superpositions contradict both our classical experience and wave-packet reduction principle, which provides for statistical mixtures.