The study of mutual entropy (information) and capacity in classica l system was extensively done after Shannon by several authors like Kolmogor ov and Gelfand. In quantum systems, there have been several definitions of t he mutual entropy for classical input and quantum output. In 1983, the autho r defined the fully quantum mechanical mutual entropy by means of the relati ve entropy of Umegaki, and he extended it to general quantum systems by the relative entropy of Araki and Uhlmann. When the author introduced the quantu m mutual entropy, he did not indicate that it contains other definitions of the mutual entropy including classical one, so that there exist several misu nderstandings for the use of the mutual entropy (information) to compute the capacity of quantum channels. Therefore in this note we point out that our quantum mutual entropy generalizes others and where the m isuse occurs.
The study of mutual entropy (information) and capacity in classica l system was extensively done after Shannon by several authors like Kolmogor ov and Gelfand. In quantum systems, there have been several definitions of t he mutual entropy for classical input and quantum output. In 1983, the autho r defined the fully quantum mechanical mutual entropy by means of the relati ve entropy of Umegaki, and he extended it to general quantum systems by the relative entropy of Araki and Uhlmann. When the author introduced the quantu m mutual entropy, he did not indicate that it contains other definitions of the mutual entropy including classical one, so that there exist several misu nderstandings for the use of the mutual entropy (information) to compute the capacity of quantum channels. Therefore in this note we point out that our quantum mutual entropy generalizes others and where the m isuse occurs.
The study of mutual entropy (information) and capacity in classica l system was extensively done after Shannon by several authors like Kolmogor ov and Gelfand. In quantum systems, there have been several definitions of t he mutual entropy for classical input and quantum output. In 1983, the autho r defined the fully quantum mechanical mutual entropy by means of the relati ve entropy of Umegaki, and it has been used to compute the capacity of quant um channel for quantum communication process; quantum input-quantum output. Recently, a correlated state in quantum syatems, so-called quantum entangled state or quantum entanglement, are used to study quntum information, in part icular, quantum computation, quantum teleportation, quantum cryptography. In this paper, we mainly discuss three things below: (1) We point out the di fference between the capacity of quantum channel and that of classical-quant um-classical channel. (2) So far the entangled state is merely defined as a non-separable state, we give a wider definition of the entangled state and c lassify the entangled states into three categories. (3) The quantum mutual e ntropy for an entangled state is discussed. The above (2) and (3) are a join t work with Belavkin.
In communication processes, a channel has an activity to communicate information of input system to output system. The mutual entropy (information) denotes an amount of information transmitted correctly from the input system to the output system through a channel. The (semi‐classical) mutual entropies for classical input and quantum output were defined by several researchers. The fully quantum mutual entropy, which is called Ohya mutual entropy, for quantum input and output by using the relative entropy was defined by Ohya in 1983, and he extended it to general quantum systems by means of the relative entropy of Araki and Uhlmann. The capacity shows the ability of the information transmission of the channel, which is used as a measure for construction of channels. The fully quantum capacity is formulated by taking the supremum of Ohya mutual entropy with respect to a certain subset of the initial state space. One of the most important theorems in quantum communication theory is coding theorem. The quantum coding theorems are discussed by using the mutual entropy — type measures introduced in the studies of quantum information.In this paper, we compare with these mutual entropy‐type measures in order to obtain most suitable one for discussing the quantum coding theorem. We concretely calculate the quantum capacity for quantum channels.
The mutual entropy (information) denotes an amount of information transmitted correctly from the input system to the output system through a channel.The (semi-classical) mutual entropies for classical input and quantum output were defined by several researchers.The fully quantum mutual entropy, which is called Ohya mutual entropy, for quantum input and output by using the relative entropy was defined by Ohya in 1983.In this paper, we co mpare with mutual entroΨ -type measures and show some resuls for quantum capacity.
The mutual entroy (information) denotes an amount of information transmitted correctly from the input system to the output system through a channel.The (semi-classical) mutual entropies for classical input and quantum output were defined by several researchers.The funy quantum mutual entropy, which is called Ohya mutual entroy, for quantum input and output by using the relative entropy was defined by Ohya in 1983.In this paper, we ∞mpue With mutual entropy−WPe measures and show some resuls for quantum capacity.
The quantum entropy was introduced by von Neumann around 1932, which describes the amont of information of the quantum state itself. It was extended by Ohya for C*‐systems. The quantum relative entropy was first defined by Umegaki for σ ‐finite von Neumann algebras, which denotes a certain difference between two states. It was extended by Araki and Uhlmann for general von Neumann algebras and *‐algebras, respectively. The development of communication theory is closely connected with study of entropy theory. In order to discuss the commuinication processes, we need at least two systems, such as input and output systems. The signal of the input system is carried through a physical device, which is called a channel. The mathematical representation of the channel is a mapping from the input state space to the output state space. The mutual entropy (information) defined by using the relative entropy between the product state consist of the input state and the output state and the compound state given by the communication process, expresses the amount of information correctly transmitted through the channel from the input system to the output system. In classical communication theory, the mutual entropy was formulated by using the joint probability distribution between the input system and the output system. The (semi‐classical) mutual entropies for classical input and quantum output were defined by several researchers. In fully quantum system, there does not exist the joint probability distribution in general. Instead of the joint probability distribution, Ohya invented the quantum (Ohya) compound state, and he introduced the fully quantum mutual entropy (information), which is called Ohya mutual entropy, for quantum input and output systems, describes the amount of information correctly sent from the quantum input system to the quantum output system through the quantum channel. It was extended by Ohya for general quantum systems. Recently Shor and Bennet et al took the coherent entropy and defined the mutual type entropy to discuss a sort of coding theorem for communication processes.In this paper, we concretely calculate these mutual entropy‐type measures for the attenuation channel in order to assay these abilities.
In this chapter, we discuss several information measures that are important for quantifying the amount of information and correlations that are present in quantum systems. The first fundamental measure that we introduce is the von Neumann entropy (or simply quantum entropy ). It is the quantum generalization of the Shannon entropy, but it captures both classical and quantum uncertainty in a quantum state.1 The quantum entropy gives meaning to the notion of an information qubit . This notion is different from that of the physical qubit, which is the description of a quantum state of an electron or a photon. The information qubit is the fundamental quantum informational unit of measure, determining how much quantum information is present in a quantum system. The initial definitions here are analogous to the classical definitions of entropy, but we soon discover a radical departure from the intuitive classical notions from the previous chapter: the conditional quantum entropy can be negative for certain quantum states. In the classical world, this negativity simply does not occur, but it takes on a special meaning in quantum information theory. Pure quantum states that are entangled have stronger-than-classical correlations and are examples of states that have negative conditional entropy. The negative of the conditional quantum entropy is so important in quantum information theory that we even have a special name for it: the coherent information. We discover that the coherent information obeys a quantum data-processing inequality, placing it on a firm footing as a particular informational measure of quantum correlations. We then define several other quantum information measures, such as quantum mutual information, that bear similar definitions as in the classical world, but with Shannon entropies replaced with quantum entropies. This replacement may seem to make quantum entropy somewhat trivial on the surface, but a simple calculation reveals that a maximally entangled state on two qubits registers two bits of quantum mutual information (recall that the largest the mutual information can be in the classical world is one bit for the case of two maximally correlated bits). We then discuss several entropy inequalities that play an important role in quantum information processing: the monotonicity of quantum relative entropy, strong subadditivity, the quantum data-processing inequalities, and continuity of quantum entropy.