AbotractWC present n simple and general simulation technique that transforms any black-box quantum algorithm (6 la Grover's database search nlgorithm) to a quantum communication protocol for a relntcd problem, in a way that fully exploits the quantum parallelism.This allows us to obtain new positive and negative results.The positive results are novel quantum communication protocols thnt nre built from nontrivial quantum algorithms via this simulation, These protocols, combined with (old and new) classical lower bounds, nre shown to provide the first asymptotic separation results between the quantum and classical (probabilistic) hvoparty communication complexity models.In particular, we obtain a quadratic separation for the bounded-error model, and an exponential separntion for the zero-error model.The negative results transform known quantum communication lower bounds to computational lower bounds in the black-box model, In particular, we show that the quadratic speed-up achieved by Grover for the OR function is impossible for the PARITY function or the MAJORITY function in the bounded-error model, nor ia It possible for the OR function itself in the exact case.This dichotomy naturally suggests a study of bounded-depth predicates (Le.those in the polynomial hierarchy) between OR and MAJORITY.We present black-box algorithms that achieve near quadratic speed up for nil such predicates.
AbotractWC present n simple and general simulation technique that transforms any black-box quantum algorithm (6 la Grover's database search nlgorithm) to a quantum communication protocol for a relntcd problem, in a way that fully exploits the quantum parallelism.This allows us to obtain new positive and negative results.The positive results are novel quantum communication protocols thnt nre built from nontrivial quantum algorithms via this simulation, These protocols, combined with (old and new) classical lower bounds, nre shown to provide the first asymptotic separation results between the quantum and classical (probabilistic) hvoparty communication complexity models.In particular, we obtain a quadratic separation for the bounded-error model, and an exponential separntion for the zero-error model.The negative results transform known quantum communication lower bounds to computational lower bounds in the black-box model, In particular, we show that the quadratic speed-up achieved by Grover for the OR function is impossible for the PARITY function or the MAJORITY function in the bounded-error model, nor ia It possible for the OR function itself in the exact case.This dichotomy naturally suggests a study of bounded-depth predicates (Le.those in the polynomial hierarchy) between OR and MAJORITY.We present black-box algorithms that achieve near quadratic speed up for nil such predicates.
We study the power of quantum proofs, or more precisely, the power of quantum Merlin-Arthur (QMA) protocols, in two well studied models of quantum computation: the black box model and the communication complexity model. Our main results are obtained for the communication complexity model. For this model, we identify a complete promise problem for QMA protocols, the linear sub-spaces distance problem. The problem is of geometrical nature: each player gets a linear subspace of R/sup m/ and considers the sphere of unit vectors in that subspace. Their goal is to output 1 if the distance between the two spheres is very small (say, smaller than 0.1 /spl middot/ /spl radic/2) and 0 if the distance is very large (say, larger than 0.9 /spl middot/ /spl radic/2). We show that: 1. The QMA communication complexity of the problem is O(logm). 2. The (classical) MA communication complexity of the problem is /spl Omega/(m/sup /spl epsi//) (for some /spl epsi/ > 0). 3. The (standard) quantum communication complexity of the problem is /spl Omega/(/spl radic/m). In particular, this gives an exponential separation between QMA communication complexity and MA communication complexity. For the black box model we give several observations. First, we observe that the block sensitivity method, as well as the polynomial method for proving lower bounds for the number of queries, can both be extended to QMA protocols. We use these methods to obtain lower bounds for the QMA black box complexity of functions. In particular, we obtain a tight lower bound of /spl Omega/(N) for the QMA black box complexity of a random function, and a tight lower bound of /spl Omega/(/spl radic/N) for the QMA black box query complexity of NOR(X/sub 1/,..., X/sub n/). In particular, this shows that any attempt to give short quantum proofs for the class of languages Co - NP have to go beyond black box arguments. We also observe that for any Boolean function G(X/sub 1/,..., X/sub n/), if for both G and 7minus;G there are QMA black box protocols that make at most T queries to the black box, then there is a classical deterministic black box protocol for G that makes 0(T/sup 6/) queries to the black box. In particular, this shows that in the black box model QMA /spl cap/ Co - QMA = P. On the positive side, we observe that any (total or partial) Boolean function G(X/sub 1/,..., X/sub n/) has a QMA black box protocol with proofs of length N that makes only 0(/spl radic/N) queries to the black box. Finally, we observe a very simple proof for the exponential separation (for promise problems) between QMA black box complexity and (classical) MA black box complexity (first obtained by Watrous).
We have seen in the previous chapters that quantum computers seem to be more powerful than classical computers for certain problems. There are limits on the power of quantum computers, however. Since a classical computer can simulate a quantum computer, a quantum computer can only compute the same set of functions that a classical computer can. The advantage of using a quantum computer is that the amount of resources needed by a quantum algorithm might be much less than what is needed by the best classical algorithm. In Section 9.1 we briefly define some classical and quantum complexity classes and give some relationships between them. Most of the interesting questions relating classical and quantum complexity classes remain open. For example, we do not yet know if a quantum computer is capable of efficiently solving an NP-complete problem (defined later). One can prove upper bounds on the difficulty of a problem by providing an algorithm that solves that problem, and proving that it will work within in a given running time. But how does one prove a lower bound on the computational complexity of a problem? For example, if we wish to find the product of two n-bit numbers, computing the answer requires outputting roughly 2n bits and that requires Ω(n) steps (in any computing model with finite-sized gates). The best-known upper bound for integer multiplication is O(n log n log log n) steps. It has proved extremely difficult to derive non-trivial lower bounds on the computational complexity of a problem. Most of the known non-trivial lower bounds are in the ‘black-box’ model (for both classical and quantum computing), where we only query the input via a ‘black-box’ of a specific form. We discuss the black-box model in more detail in Section 9.2. We then sketch several approaches for proving black-box lower bounds. The first technique has been called the ‘hybrid method’ and was used to prove that quantum searching requires Ω(√n) queries to succeed with constant probability. The second technique is called the ‘polynomial method’. We then describe a technique based on ‘block sensitivity’, and conclude with a technique known as the ‘adversary method’.
We examine the number T of queries that a quantum network requires to compute several Boolean functions on {0,1}/sup N/ in the black-box model. We show that, in the black-box model, the exponential quantum speed-up obtained for partial functions (i.e. problems involving a promise on the input) by Deutsch and Jozsa and by Simon cannot be obtained for any total function: if a quantum algorithm computes some total Boolean function f with bounded-error using T black-box queries then there is a classical deterministic algorithm that computes f exactly with O(T/sup 6/) queries. We also give asymptotically tight characterizations of T for all symmetric f in the exact, zero-error, and bounded-error settings. Finally, we give new precise bounds for AND, OR, and PARITY. Our results are a quantum extension of the so-called polynomial method, which has been successfully applied in classical complexity theory, and also a quantum extension of results by Nisan about a polynomial relationship between randomized and deterministic decision tree complexity.
We examine the number T of queries that a quantum network requires to compute several Boolean functions on {0,1}^N in the black-box model. We show that, in the black-box model, the exponential quantum speed-up obtained for partial functions (i.e. problems involving a promise on the input) by Deutsch and Jozsa and by Simon cannot be obtained for any total function: if a quantum algorithm computes some total Boolean function f with bounded-error using T black-box queries then there is a classical deterministic algorithm that computes f exactly with O(T^6) queries. We also give asymptotically tight characterizations of T for all symmetric f in the exact, zero-error, and bounded-error settings. Finally, we give new precise bounds for AND, OR, and PARITY. Our results are a quantum extension of the so-called polynomial method, which has been successfully applied in classical complexity theory, and also a quantum extension of results by Nisan about a polynomial relationship between randomized and deterministic decision tree complexity.
The main objective of quantum computation is to exploit the natural parallelism of quantum mechanics to solve problems using less computational resources than classical computers. Although quantum algorithms realizing an exponential time speed-up over the best known classical algorithms exist, no quantum algorithm is known performing computation using less space resources than classical algorithms. In this paper, we study, for the first time explicitly, spacebounded quantum algorithms for computational problems where the input is given not as a whole, but bit by bit. We show that there exist such problems that a quantum computer can solve using exponentiallyless work space than a classical computer. More precisely, we introduce a very natural and simple model of a space-bounded quantum online machine and prove an exponential separation of classical and quantum online space complexity, in the bounded-error setting and for a total language. The language we consider is inspired bya communication problem that Buhrman, Cleve and Wigderson used to show an almost quadratic separation of quantum and classical bounded-error communication complexity. We prove that, in the framework of online space complexity, the separation becomes exponential.
We investigate the power of quantum communication protocols compared to classical probabilistic protocols.In our first result we describe a total Boolean function that has a quantum Las Vegas protocol communicating at most O(N 1°/11+~) qubits for all e > 0, while any classical probabilistic protocol (with bounded error) needs ~(N/log N) bits.Then we investigate quantum one-way communication complexity.First we show that the VC-dimension lower bound on one-way probabilistic communication of [26] holds for quantum protocols, too.Then we prove that for oneway protocols computing total functions quantum Las Vegas communication is asymptotically as efficient as exact quantum communication, which is exactly as efficient as deterministic communication.We describe applications of the lower bounds for one-way communication complexity to quantum finite automata and quantum formulae.