Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9802021

Comparing the strengths of various Bell inequalities

Asher Peres

Published Feb 9, 1998• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

This paper has been withdrawn because it is superseded by quant-ph/9905084 "Bayesian analysis of Bell inequalities.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9802021

Related papers

Bell-type inequalities in classical probability theory

Loran V. Akopyan, Vladimir I. Man’ko

Journal of Russian Laser Research•Jan 1, 2009•7 citations

The space of local equivalence classes of mixed two-qubit states

Anthony Sudbery

This paper is withdrawn by the author. It is superseded by Makhlin's paper quant-ph/0002045.

arXiv:quant-ph/0001115•Jan 31, 2000•1 citation

On an alternative interpretation of the bell inequalities

Willem M. de Muynck, Omar Abu-Zeid

Physics Letters A•Feb 1, 1984•24 citations

Optimal Control of High-Fidelity Quantum Gates in the Presence of Decoherence

Matthew Grace, Constantin Brif, HERSCHEL A. RABITZ +3 more

This paper has been withdrawn as it has been superseded by postings arXiv:quant-ph/0702147 and arXiv:0712.2935

arXiv:quant-ph/0611189•Nov 17, 2006•1 citation

On some probabilistic inequalities related to the bell inequality

Enrico G. Beltrametti, Macie J. Ma̧czyński

Reports on Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 1993•3 citations

Reply to "Comment on 'Separability of quantum states and the violation of Bell-type inequalities'"

Elena R. Loubenets

It is stated by C. Simon, quant-ph/0410032, that the definition of "classicality" used in quant-ph/0310116 is "much narrower than Bell's concept of local hidden variables" and that, in the separable quantum case, the validity of the perfect correlation form of the original Bell inequality is necessarily linked with "the assumption of perfect correlations if the same (quantum) observable is measured on both sides". Here, I prove that these and other statements in quant-ph/0410032 are misleading.

arXiv:quant-ph/0502084•Feb 14, 2005•1 citation
It is stated by C. Simon, quant-ph/0410032, that the definition of "classicality" used in quant-ph/0310116 is "much narrower than Bell's concept of local hidden variables" and that, in the separable quantum case, the validity of the perfect correlation form of the original Bell inequality is necessarily linked with "the assumption of perfect correlations if the same (quantum) observable is measured on both sides". Here, I prove that these and other statements in quant-ph/0410032 are misleading.