Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9710027 · Fortschritte der Physik

Ensemble versus Individual System in Quantum Optics

Gerhard C. Hegerfeldt

Published Nov 1, 1998• 10 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Modern techniques allow experiments on a single atom or system, with new phenomena and new challenges for the theoretician. We discuss what quantum mechanics has to say about a single system. The quantum jump approach as well as the role of quantum trajectories are outlined and a rather sophisticated example is given.
DOI
10.1002/(sici)1521-3978(199811)46:6/8<595::aid-prop595>3.0.co;2-m

Related papers

Macroscopic quantum jumps

Partha Ghose

Introduction The quantum theory of atoms and molecules had its origin in the famous 1913 paper of Bohr [186] in which he suggested that the interaction of radiation and atoms occurred with the transition of an atom from one stationary internal state to another, accompanied by the emission or absorption of radiation of a frequency determined by the energy difference between these states. These transitions came to be known as ‘quantum jumps’. Since all experiments until the late 1970s used to be carried out with large ensembles of atoms and molecules, these jumps were masked and could not be directly observed; they were only inferred from spectroscopic data. In fact, with the advent of quantum mechanics they eventually came to be regarded as artefacts of Bohr's simple-minded semi-classical model. But with the availability of coherent light sources and single ions prepared in ion traps [187], [188], and optically cooled [189], [190], the issue has been reopened with the experimental demonstration of quantum jumps in single ions [191], [192], [193]. These experiments have also opened up the contentious issue of wave function collapse or reduction on measurement, as they can be regarded as making collapse visible on the oscilloscope screen [191]. Evidence of the discrete nature of quantum transitions in a single quantum system had been accumulating from the observation of photon anti-bunching in single-atom resonance fluorescence [194], the tunneling of single electrons in metal–oxide-–semiconductor junctions [195] and spin-flips of individual electrons in a Penning trap [196].

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 29, 1999•0 citations

Quantum jumps: from foundational research to particle physics

Ignazio Francesco Licata, Leonardo Chiatti

Since 1986 a vast body of experimental evidence has been accumulated of direct observation of quantum jumps in many physical systems. We can therefore assume that quantum jumps are genuine physical phenomena. On the other hand, substantial identity of "quantum jumps" and "collapses" induced by measurements can be admitted, both being represented by self-conjugate projection operators related to specific non-Hamiltonian aspects of micro-interactions. On this basis a model of quantum jump involving a single particle is discussed, and some consequences concerning hadronic physics (Hagedorn temperature, Regge trajectories) and quantum gravity are briefly sketched.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Aug 1, 2017•1 citation

The quantum-jump approach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics

Martin Bodo Plenio, P. L. Knight

Dissipation, the irreversible loss of energy and coherence, from a microsystem is the result of coupling to a much larger macrosystem (or reservoir) that is so large that one has no chance of keeping track of all of its degrees of freedom. The microsystem evolution is then described by tracing over the reservoir states, which results in an irreversible decay as excitation leaks out of the initially excited microsystems into the outer reservoir environment. Earlier treatments of this dissipation used density matrices to describe an ensemble of microsystems, either in the Schr\"odinger picture with master equations, or in the Heisenberg picture with Langevin equations. The development of experimental techniques to study single quantum systems (for example, single trapped ions, or cavity-radiation-field modes) has stimulated the construction of theoretical methods to describe individual realizations conditioned on a particular observation record of the decay channel. These methods, variously described as quantum-jump, Monte Carlo wave function, and quantum-trajectory methods, are the subject of this review article. We discuss their derivation, apply them to a number of current problems in quantum optics, and relate them to ensemble descriptions.

arXiv:quant-ph/9702007•Reviews of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 1998•1,514 citations

Introduction

Muhammad Waseem, Faizan-e-Ilahi, Muhammad Sabieh Anwar

This chapter serves as a motivation towards quantum mechanics experiments using single photons. It surveys key experiments which have in the last two decades been recreated using modern optical setups and single photon detectors. The content of the subsequent chapters is also signposted.

Institute of Physics eBooks•Jul 1, 2020•0 citations

Introduction

Ulf Leonhardt

A note to the reader Quantum optics has grown from a sub-discipline in atomic, molecular, and optical physics to a broad research area that bridges several branches of physics and that captures the imagination of the public. Quantum information science has put quantum optics into the spotlight of modern physics, as has the physics of ultracold quantum gases with its many spectacular connections to condensed-matter physics. Yet through all these exciting developments quantum optics has maintained a characteristic core of ideas that I try to explain in this slim volume. Quantum optics focuses on the simplest quantum objects, usually light and few-level atoms, where quantum mechanics appears in its purest form without the complications of more complex systems, often demonstrating in the laboratory the thought experiments that the founders of quantum mechanics dreamed of. Quantum optics has been, and will be for the foreseeable future, quintessential quantum mechanics, the quantum mechanics of simple systems, based on a core of simple yet subtle ideas and experiments. One of the strengths of quantum optics is the close connection between theory and experiment. Although this book necessarily is theoretical, many of the theoretical ideas I describe are guided by experiments or, in turn, have inspired experiments themselves. Another strength of quantum optics is that it is done by individuals or small teams. One single person or a small group can build and perform an entire experiment.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 18, 2010•0 citations

Quantum jumps in a two-level atom: Simple theories versus quantum trajectories

Howard M. Wiseman, Gilman E. S. Toombes

A strongly driven $(\ensuremath{\Omega}\ensuremath{\gg}\ensuremath{\gamma})$ two-level atom relaxes towards an equilibrium state $\ensuremath{\rho}$ which is almost completely mixed. One interpretation of this state is that it represents an ensemble average, and that an individual atom is at any time in one of the eigenstates of $\ensuremath{\rho}$. The theory of Teich and Mahler [Phys. Rev. A 45, 3300 (1992)] makes this interpretation concrete, with an individual atom jumping stochastically between the two eigenstates when a photon is emitted. The dressed-atom theory is also supposed to describe the quantum jumps of an individual atom due to photoemissions. But the two pictures are contradictory because the dressed states of the atom are almost orthogonal to the eigenstates of $\ensuremath{\rho}$. In this paper we investigate three ways of measuring the field radiated by the atom, which attempt to reproduce the simple quantum jump dynamics of the dressed state or Teich and Mahler models. These are spectral detection (using optical filters), two-state jumps (using adaptive homodyne detection), and orthogonal jumps (another adaptive homodyne scheme). We find that the three schemes closely mimic the jumps of the dressed-state model, with errors of order $\frac{3}{4}(\ensuremath{\gamma}/\ensuremath{\Omega}{)}^{2/3},$ $\frac{1}{4}(\ensuremath{\gamma}/\ensuremath{\Omega}{)}^{2}$, and $\frac{3}{4}(\ensuremath{\gamma}/\ensuremath{\Omega}{)}^{2}$, respectively. The significance of this result to the program of environmentally induced superselection is discussed.

Physical Review A•Sep 1, 1999•31 citations
Introduction The quantum theory of atoms and molecules had its origin in the famous 1913 paper of Bohr [186] in which he suggested that the interaction of radiation and atoms occurred with the transition of an atom from one stationary internal state to another, accompanied by the emission or absorption of radiation of a frequency determined by the energy difference between these states. These transitions came to be known as ‘quantum jumps’. Since all experiments until the late 1970s used to be carried out with large ensembles of atoms and molecules, these jumps were masked and could not be directly observed; they were only inferred from spectroscopic data. In fact, with the advent of quantum mechanics they eventually came to be regarded as artefacts of Bohr's simple-minded semi-classical model. But with the availability of coherent light sources and single ions prepared in ion traps [187], [188], and optically cooled [189], [190], the issue has been reopened with the experimental demonstration of quantum jumps in single ions [191], [192], [193]. These experiments have also opened up the contentious issue of wave function collapse or reduction on measurement, as they can be regarded as making collapse visible on the oscilloscope screen [191]. Evidence of the discrete nature of quantum transitions in a single quantum system had been accumulating from the observation of photon anti-bunching in single-atom resonance fluorescence [194], the tunneling of single electrons in metal–oxide-–semiconductor junctions [195] and spin-flips of individual electrons in a Penning trap [196].
Since 1986 a vast body of experimental evidence has been accumulated of direct observation of quantum jumps in many physical systems. We can therefore assume that quantum jumps are genuine physical phenomena. On the other hand, substantial identity of "quantum jumps" and "collapses" induced by measurements can be admitted, both being represented by self-conjugate projection operators related to specific non-Hamiltonian aspects of micro-interactions. On this basis a model of quantum jump involving a single particle is discussed, and some consequences concerning hadronic physics (Hagedorn temperature, Regge trajectories) and quantum gravity are briefly sketched.
Dissipation, the irreversible loss of energy and coherence, from a microsystem is the result of coupling to a much larger macrosystem (or reservoir) that is so large that one has no chance of keeping track of all of its degrees of freedom. The microsystem evolution is then described by tracing over the reservoir states, which results in an irreversible decay as excitation leaks out of the initially excited microsystems into the outer reservoir environment. Earlier treatments of this dissipation used density matrices to describe an ensemble of microsystems, either in the Schr\"odinger picture with master equations, or in the Heisenberg picture with Langevin equations. The development of experimental techniques to study single quantum systems (for example, single trapped ions, or cavity-radiation-field modes) has stimulated the construction of theoretical methods to describe individual realizations conditioned on a particular observation record of the decay channel. These methods, variously described as quantum-jump, Monte Carlo wave function, and quantum-trajectory methods, are the subject of this review article. We discuss their derivation, apply them to a number of current problems in quantum optics, and relate them to ensemble descriptions.
A note to the reader Quantum optics has grown from a sub-discipline in atomic, molecular, and optical physics to a broad research area that bridges several branches of physics and that captures the imagination of the public. Quantum information science has put quantum optics into the spotlight of modern physics, as has the physics of ultracold quantum gases with its many spectacular connections to condensed-matter physics. Yet through all these exciting developments quantum optics has maintained a characteristic core of ideas that I try to explain in this slim volume. Quantum optics focuses on the simplest quantum objects, usually light and few-level atoms, where quantum mechanics appears in its purest form without the complications of more complex systems, often demonstrating in the laboratory the thought experiments that the founders of quantum mechanics dreamed of. Quantum optics has been, and will be for the foreseeable future, quintessential quantum mechanics, the quantum mechanics of simple systems, based on a core of simple yet subtle ideas and experiments. One of the strengths of quantum optics is the close connection between theory and experiment. Although this book necessarily is theoretical, many of the theoretical ideas I describe are guided by experiments or, in turn, have inspired experiments themselves. Another strength of quantum optics is that it is done by individuals or small teams. One single person or a small group can build and perform an entire experiment.
A strongly driven $(\ensuremath{\Omega}\ensuremath{\gg}\ensuremath{\gamma})$ two-level atom relaxes towards an equilibrium state $\ensuremath{\rho}$ which is almost completely mixed. One interpretation of this state is that it represents an ensemble average, and that an individual atom is at any time in one of the eigenstates of $\ensuremath{\rho}$. The theory of Teich and Mahler [Phys. Rev. A 45, 3300 (1992)] makes this interpretation concrete, with an individual atom jumping stochastically between the two eigenstates when a photon is emitted. The dressed-atom theory is also supposed to describe the quantum jumps of an individual atom due to photoemissions. But the two pictures are contradictory because the dressed states of the atom are almost orthogonal to the eigenstates of $\ensuremath{\rho}$. In this paper we investigate three ways of measuring the field radiated by the atom, which attempt to reproduce the simple quantum jump dynamics of the dressed state or Teich and Mahler models. These are spectral detection (using optical filters), two-state jumps (using adaptive homodyne detection), and orthogonal jumps (another adaptive homodyne scheme). We find that the three schemes closely mimic the jumps of the dressed-state model, with errors of order $\frac{3}{4}(\ensuremath{\gamma}/\ensuremath{\Omega}{)}^{2/3},$ $\frac{1}{4}(\ensuremath{\gamma}/\ensuremath{\Omega}{)}^{2}$, and $\frac{3}{4}(\ensuremath{\gamma}/\ensuremath{\Omega}{)}^{2}$, respectively. The significance of this result to the program of environmentally induced superselection is discussed.