Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9709044

On (non)linear Quantum Mechanics

P. Nattermann

Published Sep 19, 1997• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We review a possible framework for (non)linear quantum theories, into which linear quantum mechanics fits as well, and discuss the notion of ``equivalence'' in this setting. Finally, we draw the attention to persisting severe problems of nonlinear quantum theories.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9709044

Related papers

EXTENDED QUANTUM MECHANICS

B Pavel

The work can be considered as an essay on mathematical and conceptual structure of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics (QM) which is related here to some other (more general, but also to more special and “approximative”) theories. QM is here primarily reformulated in an equivalent form of a Poisson system on the phase space consisting of density matrices, where the “observables”, as well as “symmetry generators” are represented by a specific type of real valued (densely defined) functions, namely the usual quantum expectations of corresponding selfadjoint operators. It is shown in this paper that inclusion of additional (“nonlinear”) symmetry generators (i.e. “Hamiltonians”) into this reformulation of (linear) QM leads to a considerable extension of the theory: two kinds of quantum “mixed states” should be distinguished, and operator ‐ valued functions of density matrices should be used in the r ˆ ole of “nonlinear observables”. A general framework for physical theories is obtained in this way: By different choices of the sets of “nonlinear observables” we obtain, as special cases, e.g. classical mechanics on homogeneous spaces of kinematical symmetry groups, standard (linear) QM, or nonlinear extensions of QM; also various “quasiclassical approximations” to QM are all subtheories of the presented extension of QM - a version of the extended quantum mechanics (EQM). A general interpretation scheme of EQM extending the usual statistical interpretation of QM is also proposed. Eventually, EQM is shown to be (included into) a C -algebraic (hence linear) quantum theory. Mathematical formulation of these theories is presented. The presentation includes an analysis of problems connected with differentiation on infinite ‐ dimensional manifolds, as well as a solution of some problems connected with the work with only densely defined unbounded real‐valued functions on the (infinite dimensional) “phase space” which correspond to unbounded operators (generators) and to their nonlinear generalizations. Also “nonlinear deformations” of unitary representations of kinematical symmetry Lie groups are introduced. Possible applications are briefly discussed, and some specific examples are presented. The text contains also brief reviews of Hamiltonian classical mechanics, as well as of QM. Mathematical appendices make the paper nearly selfcontained.

•Jan 1, 2000•18 citations

NON-LINEAR QUANTUM MECHANICS: TWO POSSIBILITIES

Craig D. Roberts

A comparative discussion of two possible non-linear extensions of quantum mechanics is presented. It is argued that the two extensions are mutually consistent but applicable to completely different phenomena and that, as a consequence, quantum mechanics will be demonstrated to be truly linear only if both extensions are precluded by experiment.

Modern Physics Letters A•Jan 20, 1990•0 citations

Bridging Classical and Quantum Worlds: Maps, States, and Evolutions

D. Amato, P. Facchi, G. Marmo

In this work, we present several aspects of the interplay between classical and quantum theories. After reviewing the equivalence between positivity and complete positivity in the commutative setting, we introduce and analyze intermediate notions that interpolate between these two properties for linear maps on the space of operators on a Hilbert space, highlighting their natural connections to quantum dynamics and entanglement theory. Finally, we discuss possible constructions that allow one to derive quantum states and evolutions from classical counterparts, and vice versa.

quant-pharXiv:2511.09390•Open Systems & Information Dynamics•Nov 13, 2025•0 citations

Can There Be a Non-linear Quantum Mechanics?

Pankaj Sharan

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2023•1 citation

Can There Be a Non-linear Quantum Mechanics?

Pankaj Sharan

SpringerBriefs in physics•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Classical Models for Quantum Information

Federico Holik, G. M. Bosyk

In this chapter, we will discuss the ontological status of the notion of quantuminformation. In the first part, we review the mathematical framework ofa generalized information theory. In this framework, probability theory will play a central role and, thus, we will devote Section 2 to it.We argue that the existence of probabilistic models that go beyond the classical and quantum realms, and the possibility of performing informational protocols in those models, allow us to claim that a generalized information theory can be conceived. Notice that this perspective is complementary to that of other research programs (see, e.g., Holik et al. 2015; Holik et al. 2016, and references therein). In the second part, we will consider the question about the ontology of the possible models satisfying the different instances of that generalized formalism. This will be the content of Section 3. Specifically, we want to study the role quantum mechanics plays in quantum information protocols; the question is whether there are other possible ontologies that can perform the same tasks. We will relate this problem to the existence of many examples of physical systems that are actually constructed using an essentially classical ontology but, on the other hand, are modeled by structures resembling the laws of quantum mechanics (e.g. Aerts 1998; Kwiat et al. 2000; Spreeuw 2001;Couder et al. 2005; Couder and Fort 2006; Qian et al. 2015). Their significancefor us relies in the fact that they can be used to perform quantum information protocols (though, in an inefficient way) (Man?ko et al. 2001; Bhattacharya et al. 2002; Francisco et al. 2006a, 2006b; Francisco and Ledesma 2008; Goldin et al. 2010). On this basis, we will explore the ontological implications of the existence of these simulations. Finally, in Section 4 we will draw our conclusions.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 24, 2017•0 citations
The work can be considered as an essay on mathematical and conceptual structure of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics (QM) which is related here to some other (more general, but also to more special and “approximative”) theories. QM is here primarily reformulated in an equivalent form of a Poisson system on the phase space consisting of density matrices, where the “observables”, as well as “symmetry generators” are represented by a specific type of real valued (densely defined) functions, namely the usual quantum expectations of corresponding selfadjoint operators. It is shown in this paper that inclusion of additional (“nonlinear”) symmetry generators (i.e. “Hamiltonians”) into this reformulation of (linear) QM leads to a considerable extension of the theory: two kinds of quantum “mixed states” should be distinguished, and operator ‐ valued functions of density matrices should be used in the r ˆ ole of “nonlinear observables”. A general framework for physical theories is obtained in this way: By different choices of the sets of “nonlinear observables” we obtain, as special cases, e.g. classical mechanics on homogeneous spaces of kinematical symmetry groups, standard (linear) QM, or nonlinear extensions of QM; also various “quasiclassical approximations” to QM are all subtheories of the presented extension of QM - a version of the extended quantum mechanics (EQM). A general interpretation scheme of EQM extending the usual statistical interpretation of QM is also proposed. Eventually, EQM is shown to be (included into) a C -algebraic (hence linear) quantum theory. Mathematical formulation of these theories is presented. The presentation includes an analysis of problems connected with differentiation on infinite ‐ dimensional manifolds, as well as a solution of some problems connected with the work with only densely defined unbounded real‐valued functions on the (infinite dimensional) “phase space” which correspond to unbounded operators (generators) and to their nonlinear generalizations. Also “nonlinear deformations” of unitary representations of kinematical symmetry Lie groups are introduced. Possible applications are briefly discussed, and some specific examples are presented. The text contains also brief reviews of Hamiltonian classical mechanics, as well as of QM. Mathematical appendices make the paper nearly selfcontained.
In this work, we present several aspects of the interplay between classical and quantum theories. After reviewing the equivalence between positivity and complete positivity in the commutative setting, we introduce and analyze intermediate notions that interpolate between these two properties for linear maps on the space of operators on a Hilbert space, highlighting their natural connections to quantum dynamics and entanglement theory. Finally, we discuss possible constructions that allow one to derive quantum states and evolutions from classical counterparts, and vice versa.
In this chapter, we will discuss the ontological status of the notion of quantuminformation. In the first part, we review the mathematical framework ofa generalized information theory. In this framework, probability theory will play a central role and, thus, we will devote Section 2 to it.We argue that the existence of probabilistic models that go beyond the classical and quantum realms, and the possibility of performing informational protocols in those models, allow us to claim that a generalized information theory can be conceived. Notice that this perspective is complementary to that of other research programs (see, e.g., Holik et al. 2015; Holik et al. 2016, and references therein). In the second part, we will consider the question about the ontology of the possible models satisfying the different instances of that generalized formalism. This will be the content of Section 3. Specifically, we want to study the role quantum mechanics plays in quantum information protocols; the question is whether there are other possible ontologies that can perform the same tasks. We will relate this problem to the existence of many examples of physical systems that are actually constructed using an essentially classical ontology but, on the other hand, are modeled by structures resembling the laws of quantum mechanics (e.g. Aerts 1998; Kwiat et al. 2000; Spreeuw 2001;Couder et al. 2005; Couder and Fort 2006; Qian et al. 2015). Their significancefor us relies in the fact that they can be used to perform quantum information protocols (though, in an inefficient way) (Man?ko et al. 2001; Bhattacharya et al. 2002; Francisco et al. 2006a, 2006b; Francisco and Ledesma 2008; Goldin et al. 2010). On this basis, we will explore the ontological implications of the existence of these simulations. Finally, in Section 4 we will draw our conclusions.