Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9708047 · Physical Review A

Factoring and Fourier transformation with a Mach-Zehnder interferometer

Johann Summhammer

Published Nov 1, 1997• 22 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The scheme of Clauser and Dowling [Phys. Rev. A 53, 4587 (1996)] for factoring $N$ by means of an $N$-slit interference experiment is translated into an experiment with a single Mach-Zehnder interferometer. With dispersive phase shifters, the ratio of the coherence length to wavelength limits the numbers that can be factored. A conservative estimate permits $N\ensuremath{\approx}{10}^{7}$. It is furthermore shown that sine and cosine Fourier coefficients of a real periodic function can be obtained with such an interferometer.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.56.4324

Related papers

On the physical explanation of the experiments with double-slit and with the Mach-Zehnder interferometer

V A Kuz`Menko

There is independent experimental evidence in favor of conspiracy theory in the explanation of the physical nature of quantum interference in experiments with slits and interferometers.

•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Which role does multiphoton interference play in small phase estimation in quantum Fourier transform interferometers?

Olaf Zimmermann, Vincenzo Tamma

Recently, quantum Fourier transform interferometers have been demonstrated to allow a quantum metrological enhancement in phase sensitivity for a small number [Formula: see text] of identical input single photons [J. P. Olson, K. R. Motes, P. M. Birchall, N. M. Studer, M. LaBorde, T. Moulder, P. P. Rohde and J. P. Dowling, Phys. Rev. A 96 (2017) 013810; K. R. Motes, J. P. Olson, E. J. Rabeaux, J. P. Dowling, S. J. Olson and P. P. Rohde, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 170802; O. Zimmermann, Bachelor Thesis (Ulm University, 2015) arXiv: 1710.03805.]. However, multiphoton distinguishability at the detectors can play an important role from an experimental point of view [V. Tamma and S. Laibacher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 243601.]. This raises a fundamental question: How is the phase sensitivity affected when the photons are completely distinguishable at the detectors and therefore do not interfere? In other words, which role does multiphoton interference play in these schemes? Here, we show that for small phase values, the phase sensitivity achievable in the proposed schemes with indistinguishable photons is enhanced only by a constant factor with respect to the case of completely distinguishable photons at the detectors. Interestingly, this enhancement arises from the interference of only a polynomial number (in [Formula: see text]) of the total [Formula: see text] multiphoton path amplitudes in the [Formula: see text]-port interferometer. These results are independent of the number [Formula: see text] of single photons and of the phase weight factors employed at each interferometer channel.

arXiv:1712.01898•International Journal of Quantum Information•Dec 1, 2017•3 citations

Phase sensitivity of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer

Luca Pezzè, Augusto Smerzi

The best performance of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer is achieved with the input state $\ensuremath{\mid}{N}_{T}∕2+1⟩\ensuremath{\mid}{N}_{T}∕2\ensuremath{-}1⟩+\ensuremath{\mid}{N}_{T}∕2\ensuremath{-}1⟩\ensuremath{\mid}{N}_{T}∕2+1⟩$, ${N}_{T}$ being the total number of atoms or photons. This gives (i) a phase-shift error confidence ${C}_{68%}=2.67∕{N}_{T}$ with (ii) a single interferometric measurement. Different input quantum states can achieve the Heisenberg scaling $\ensuremath{\sim}1∕{N}_{T}$ but with higher prefactors and at the price of a statistical analysis of two or more independent measurements.

arXiv:quant-ph/0511059•Physical Review A•Jan 3, 2006•77 citations

Phase Sensitivity and Entanglement of Mach-Zehnder Interferometer

Xiu-Xia Hu

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jan 6, 2016•0 citations

Further compactifying linear optical unitaries

B. A. Bell, I. A. Walmsley

Quantum integrated photonics requires large-scale linear optical circuitry, and for many applications, it is desirable to have a universally programmable circuit, able to implement an arbitrary unitary transformation on a number of modes. This has been achieved using the Reck scheme, consisting of a network of Mach–Zehnder interferometers containing a variable phase shifter in one path as well as an external phase shifter after each Mach–Zehnder. It subsequently became apparent that with symmetric Mach–Zehnders containing a phase shifter in both paths, the external phase shifters are redundant, resulting in a more compact circuit. The rectangular Clements scheme improves on the Reck scheme in terms of circuit depth, but it has been thought that an external phase-shifter was necessary after each Mach–Zehnder. Here, we show that the Clements scheme can be realized using symmetric Mach–Zehnders, requiring only a small number of external phase-shifters that do not contribute to the depth of the circuit. This will result in a significant saving in the length of these devices, allowing more complex circuits to fit onto a photonic chip, and reducing the propagation losses associated with these circuits. We also discuss how similar savings can be made to alternative schemes, which have robustness to imbalanced beam-splitters.

arXiv:2104.07561•APL Photonics•Jul 1, 2021•46 citations

Waveguide Mach-Zehnder interferometer to enhance the sensitivity of quantum parameter estimation

X. N. Feng, Huaiyuan Liu, L. F. Wei

The waveguide Fabry-Perot interferometer (FPI) (see, e.g., in Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 243601 (2015)10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.243601 and Nature569, 692 (2019)10.1038/s41586-019-1196-1), instead of the free space's one, have been demonstrated for the sensitive quantum parameter estimations. Here, we propose a waveguide Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) to further enhance the sensitivity of the relevant parameter estimations. The configuration is formed by two one-dimensional waveguides coupled sequentially to two atomic mirrors, which are served as the beam splitters of the waveguide photons to control the probabilities of the photons being transferred from one waveguide to another. Due to the quantum interference of the waveguide photons, the acquired phase of the photons when they pass through a phase shifter can be sensitively estimated by measuring either the transmitted or reflected probabilities of the transporting photons. Interestingly, we show that, with the proposed waveguide MZI the sensitivity of the quantum parameter estimation could be further optimized, compared with the waveguide FPI, in the same condition. The feasibility of the proposal, with the current atom-waveguide integrated technique, is also discussed.

Optics Express•Apr 14, 2023•2 citations
The scheme of Clauser and Dowling [Phys. Rev. A 53, 4587 (1996)] for factoring NNN by means of an NNN-slit interference experiment is translated into an experiment with a single Mach-Zehnder interferometer. With dispersive phase shifters, the ratio of the coherence length to wavelength limits the numbers that can be factored. A conservative estimate permits N\ensuremath≈107N\ensuremath{\approx}{10}^{7}N\ensuremath≈107. It is furthermore shown that sine and cosine Fourier coefficients of a real periodic function can be obtained with such an interferometer.
Recently, quantum Fourier transform interferometers have been demonstrated to allow a quantum metrological enhancement in phase sensitivity for a small number [Formula: see text] of identical input single photons [J. P. Olson, K. R. Motes, P. M. Birchall, N. M. Studer, M. LaBorde, T. Moulder, P. P. Rohde and J. P. Dowling, Phys. Rev. A 96 (2017) 013810; K. R. Motes, J. P. Olson, E. J. Rabeaux, J. P. Dowling, S. J. Olson and P. P. Rohde, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 170802; O. Zimmermann, Bachelor Thesis (Ulm University, 2015) arXiv: 1710.03805.]. However, multiphoton distinguishability at the detectors can play an important role from an experimental point of view [V. Tamma and S. Laibacher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 243601.]. This raises a fundamental question: How is the phase sensitivity affected when the photons are completely distinguishable at the detectors and therefore do not interfere? In other words, which role does multiphoton interference play in these schemes? Here, we show that for small phase values, the phase sensitivity achievable in the proposed schemes with indistinguishable photons is enhanced only by a constant factor with respect to the case of completely distinguishable photons at the detectors. Interestingly, this enhancement arises from the interference of only a polynomial number (in [Formula: see text]) of the total [Formula: see text] multiphoton path amplitudes in the [Formula: see text]-port interferometer. These results are independent of the number [Formula: see text] of single photons and of the phase weight factors employed at each interferometer channel.
The best performance of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer is achieved with the input state $\ensuremath{\mid}{N}_{T}∕2+1⟩\ensuremath{\mid}{N}_{T}∕2\ensuremath{-}1⟩+\ensuremath{\mid}{N}_{T}∕2\ensuremath{-}1⟩\ensuremath{\mid}{N}_{T}∕2+1⟩$, NT{N}_{T}NT​ being the total number of atoms or photons. This gives (i) a phase-shift error confidence ${C}_{68%}=2.67∕{N}_{T}$ with (ii) a single interferometric measurement. Different input quantum states can achieve the Heisenberg scaling $\ensuremath{\sim}1∕{N}_{T}$ but with higher prefactors and at the price of a statistical analysis of two or more independent measurements.
Quantum integrated photonics requires large-scale linear optical circuitry, and for many applications, it is desirable to have a universally programmable circuit, able to implement an arbitrary unitary transformation on a number of modes. This has been achieved using the Reck scheme, consisting of a network of Mach–Zehnder interferometers containing a variable phase shifter in one path as well as an external phase shifter after each Mach–Zehnder. It subsequently became apparent that with symmetric Mach–Zehnders containing a phase shifter in both paths, the external phase shifters are redundant, resulting in a more compact circuit. The rectangular Clements scheme improves on the Reck scheme in terms of circuit depth, but it has been thought that an external phase-shifter was necessary after each Mach–Zehnder. Here, we show that the Clements scheme can be realized using symmetric Mach–Zehnders, requiring only a small number of external phase-shifters that do not contribute to the depth of the circuit. This will result in a significant saving in the length of these devices, allowing more complex circuits to fit onto a photonic chip, and reducing the propagation losses associated with these circuits. We also discuss how similar savings can be made to alternative schemes, which have robustness to imbalanced beam-splitters.
The waveguide Fabry-Perot interferometer (FPI) (see, e.g., in Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 243601 (2015)10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.243601 and Nature569, 692 (2019)10.1038/s41586-019-1196-1), instead of the free space's one, have been demonstrated for the sensitive quantum parameter estimations. Here, we propose a waveguide Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) to further enhance the sensitivity of the relevant parameter estimations. The configuration is formed by two one-dimensional waveguides coupled sequentially to two atomic mirrors, which are served as the beam splitters of the waveguide photons to control the probabilities of the photons being transferred from one waveguide to another. Due to the quantum interference of the waveguide photons, the acquired phase of the photons when they pass through a phase shifter can be sensitively estimated by measuring either the transmitted or reflected probabilities of the transporting photons. Interestingly, we show that, with the proposed waveguide MZI the sensitivity of the quantum parameter estimation could be further optimized, compared with the waveguide FPI, in the same condition. The feasibility of the proposal, with the current atom-waveguide integrated technique, is also discussed.