Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9708044

Explanation of the violation of Bell's inequality by maintaining Einstein separability

Gyula Bene

Published Aug 26, 1997• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

A new interpretation offers a consistent conceptual basis for nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. The violation of Bell's inequality is explained by maintaining realism, inductive inference and Einstein separability.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9708044

Related papers

Quantum phenomena do not violate the principle of locality - a new interpretation with physical consequences -

Gyula Bene

A new interpretation of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics explains the violation of Bell's inequality by maintaining realism and the principle of locality.

arXiv:quant-ph/9706043•Jun 18, 1997•3 citations

On the solution of the EPR paradox and the explanation of the violation of Bell's inequality

Gyula Bene

A new interpretation offers a consistent conceptual basis for nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox is solved and the violation of Bell's inequality is explained by maintaining realism, inductive inference and Einstein separability.

arXiv:quant-ph/9708045•Aug 27, 1997•1 citation

Do the Experimental Violations of Bell Inequalities Require a Non-Local Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics？

Edward Edward, F�ry

量子光学学报•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

The experimental violation of Bell's inequality [as predicted by quantum mechanics]: A contribution to the study of its meaning

Bertrand Hespel

•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

Reconciling Local Realism with Quantum Mechanics: The Generalized BCHSH Inequalities

Claudio Garola, Sandro Sozzo

Most physicists uphold that the tests of the Bell-Clauser, Horne, Shimony and Holt (BCHSH) inequalities confirm quantum mechanics (QM) and refute local realism. Some scholars, however, criticize this conviction, yet maintaining that QM conflicts with local realism. At variance with both viewpoints one of the authors has recently worked out an extended semantic realism (ESR) model which shows that, if quantum probabilities are interpreted as conditional rather than absolute probabilities, a picture of the microworld can be constructed that is simultaneously consistent with local realism and QM. We show here that the BCHSH inequalities must be replaced, within the ESR model, by more general inequalities. These depend on parameters (detection probabilities) which may be such that the inequalities are never violated by quantum expectation values. The condition that no violation occurs implies the existence of upper bounds on detection probabilities, which makes the ESR model falsifiable. These results admit an intuitive explanation in terms of unfair sampling but basically differ from the seemingly similar results obtained by other approaches in which the efficiency problem is discussed in order to vindicate some kind of local realism.

•Mar 28, 2007•0 citations

The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning

Christopher J. Wood, Robert W. Spekkens

An active area of research in the fields of machine learning and statistics is the development of causal discovery algorithms , the purpose of which is to infer the causal relations that hold among a set of variables from the correlations that these exhibit . We apply some of these algorithms to the correlations that arise for entangled quantum systems. We show that they cannot distinguish correlations that satisfy Bell inequalities from correlations that violate Bell inequalities, and consequently that they cannot do justice to the challenges of explaining certain quantum correlations causally. Nonetheless, by adapting the conceptual tools of causal inference, we can show that any attempt to provide a causal explanation of nonsignalling correlations that violate a Bell inequality must contradict a core principle of these algorithms, namely, that an observed statistical independence between variables should not be explained by fine-tuning of the causal parameters. In particular, we demonstrate the need for such fine-tuning for most of the causal mechanisms that have been proposed to underlie Bell correlations, including superluminal causal influences, superdeterminism (that is, a denial of freedom of choice of settings), and retrocausal influences which do not introduce causal cycles.

arXiv:1208.4119•New Journal of Physics•Mar 3, 2015•334 citations
Most physicists uphold that the tests of the Bell-Clauser, Horne, Shimony and Holt (BCHSH) inequalities confirm quantum mechanics (QM) and refute local realism. Some scholars, however, criticize this conviction, yet maintaining that QM conflicts with local realism. At variance with both viewpoints one of the authors has recently worked out an extended semantic realism (ESR) model which shows that, if quantum probabilities are interpreted as conditional rather than absolute probabilities, a picture of the microworld can be constructed that is simultaneously consistent with local realism and QM. We show here that the BCHSH inequalities must be replaced, within the ESR model, by more general inequalities. These depend on parameters (detection probabilities) which may be such that the inequalities are never violated by quantum expectation values. The condition that no violation occurs implies the existence of upper bounds on detection probabilities, which makes the ESR model falsifiable. These results admit an intuitive explanation in terms of unfair sampling but basically differ from the seemingly similar results obtained by other approaches in which the efficiency problem is discussed in order to vindicate some kind of local realism.
An active area of research in the fields of machine learning and statistics is the development of causal discovery algorithms , the purpose of which is to infer the causal relations that hold among a set of variables from the correlations that these exhibit . We apply some of these algorithms to the correlations that arise for entangled quantum systems. We show that they cannot distinguish correlations that satisfy Bell inequalities from correlations that violate Bell inequalities, and consequently that they cannot do justice to the challenges of explaining certain quantum correlations causally. Nonetheless, by adapting the conceptual tools of causal inference, we can show that any attempt to provide a causal explanation of nonsignalling correlations that violate a Bell inequality must contradict a core principle of these algorithms, namely, that an observed statistical independence between variables should not be explained by fine-tuning of the causal parameters. In particular, we demonstrate the need for such fine-tuning for most of the causal mechanisms that have been proposed to underlie Bell correlations, including superluminal causal influences, superdeterminism (that is, a denial of freedom of choice of settings), and retrocausal influences which do not introduce causal cycles.