Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9704043 · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Quantum codes of minimum distance two

Eric M. Rains

Published Jan 1, 1999• 76 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

It is reasonable to expect the theory of quantum codes to be simplified in the case of codes of minimum distance 2; thus it makes sense to examine such codes in the hopes that techniques that prove effective there will generalize. With this in mind, we present a number of results on codes of minimum distance 2. We first compute the linear programming bound on the dimension of such a code, then show that this bound can only be attained when the code either is of even length, or is of length 3 or 5. We next consider questions of uniqueness, showing that the optimal code of length 2 or 1 is unique (implying that the well-known one-qubit-in-five single-error correcting code is unique), and presenting nonadditive optimal codes of all greater even lengths. Finally, we compute the full automorphism group of the more important distance 2 codes, allowing us to determine the full automorphism group of any GF(4)-linear code.

DOI
10.1109/18.746807

Related papers

On the Construction of Odd Length Quantum Codes

Manish K. Gupta, R. Narula, Divya Taneja

In this paper, we endeavor for an extensive study of [[n,n-3,2]] codes of odd length. We begin with the computation of the linear programming bound on the dimension of distance 2 codes of odd length and show that the [[n,n-3,2]] codes are optimal. We next find their generator matrix, stabilizer structure and also show that these codes are impure or degenerate except the [[3,0,2]] code which is pure by convention. In degenerate codes, distinct errors do not necessarily take the code space to orthogonal space. So sometimes they can correct more errors than that they can identify and has the capacity to store more information than a nondegenerate code. The present paper also establishes the existence of ((2m+1,2^(2m-2),2)) codes from the ((2m,2^(2m-2),2)) codes for all m>1. We have also constructed another class of distance 2 codes which are constructed using distance 3 codes.

British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science•Jan 10, 2015•2 citations

Simple Family of Nonadditive Quantum Codes

John A. Smolin, Graeme Smith, Stephanie Wehner

Most known quantum codes are additive, meaning the code can be described as the simultaneous eigenspace of an Abelian subgroup of the Pauli group. While in some scenarios such codes are strictly suboptimal, very little is understood about how to construct nonadditive codes with good performance. Here we present a family of distance 2 nonadditive quantum codes for all odd block lengths n, that has a particularly simple form. Our codes detect single qubit errors (or correct single qubit erasures) while encoding a higher dimensional space than is possible with an additive code or, for n> or =11, any previous codes. We exhibit the encoding circuits and automorphism group for our codes as well.

arXiv:quant-ph/0701065•Physical Review Letters•Sep 28, 2007•48 citations

Upper bounds on minimum distance of nonbinary quantum stabilizer codes

Santosh Kumar

The most popular class of quantum error correcting codes is stabilizer codes. Binary quantum stabilizer codes have been well studied, and Calderbank, Rains, Shor and Sloane (July 1998) have constructed a table of upper bounds on the minimum distance of these codes using linear programming methods. However, not much is known in the case of nonbinary stabilizer codes. In this thesis, we establish a bridge between selforthogonal classical codes over the finite field containing q2 elements and quantum codes, extending and unifying previous work by Matsumoto and Uyematsu (2000), Ashikhmin and Knill (November 2001), Kim and Walker (2004). We construct a table of upper bounds on the minimum distance of the stabilizer codes using linear programming methods that are tighter than currently known bounds. Finally, we derive code construction techniques that will help us find new codes from existing ones. All these results help us to gain a better understanding of the theory of nonbinary stabilizer codes.

•Nov 1, 2005•0 citations

All the optimal stabilizer codes of distance 3

Sixia Yu, Ying Dong, Qing Chen

Abstract — Optimal quantum stabilizer codes of distance 3 are explicitly constructed for all lengths except for the following four families of lengths 8fm − {1, 2} and fm+2 − {2, 3} with fm = 4 m −1 3 and m ≥ 2 being integer, for which our codes are of the best parameters known and are only one logical qubit less than the quantum Hamming bound. The optimality of our codes is ensured by saturating either the quantum Hamming bound or a stronger bound for three families of lengths 8fm + {1, 2} and fm+2 − 1 with m ≥ 1 derived from the linear programming bound. For the lengths less than 128 three previously unknown codes [[36, 29, 3]], [[37, 30, 3]] and [[81, 73, 3]] have been found. Index Terms — quantum error correction, 1-error correcting stabilizer codes, quantum Hamming bound, linear programming bound, optimal codes I.

•Jan 14, 2009•3 citations

Finite Classification of Transversal Diagonal Gates Beyond Stabilizer Codes

Xi He, Chao Zhang, Shilin Huang +1 more

We establish that transversal diagonal gates on exact qubit codes of distance at least two can be exhaustively classified within a finite search space. Although code-preserving physical gates can have continuous phases, any projective logical action induced by a transversal diagonal gate can always be realized by a physical gate of finite order. Crucially, we prove that this physical order has an upper bound determined solely by the code parameters. This order bound enables the subset-sum-linear-programming (SSLP) framework introduced in arXiv:2504.20847 to exhaustively enumerate all candidate discrete symmetries, after which the Knill-Laflamme equations determine the remaining continuous code parameters. Applying this method to the nontrivial diagonal sector of exact $((6,2,3))$ codes, SSLP yields $66$ candidate symmetry classes, of which exactly $15$ are realizable, supporting full projective diagonal logical cyclic groups of orders $2$, $3$, and $5$. In particular, for order $5$, the code is unique up to local unitaries and qubit permutations, equivalent to the code constructed in arXiv:2504.20847. This code also attains the minimum length $n=6$ among exact $((n, 2, \ge 3))$ codes whose full projective transversal group cannot be conjugated into the projective Clifford group.

quant-pharXiv:2610.29955•Oct 22, 2026•0 citations

Quantum stabilizer codes construction from Hermitian self-orthogonal codes over GF(4)

Duc Manh Nguyen, Sunghwan Kim

In order to construct quantum error correction code, we consider additive codes over Galois field GF(4), which are self-orthogonal with respect to a certain Hermitian product. In this paper, we first propose a new approach to the construction of Hermitian self-orthogonal linear codes, applying the extension to get a longer length, and prove the codes have good minimum distance. Then, we investigate the corresponding quantum stabilizer codes from the classical codes. Six optimal quantum stabilizer codes have been achieved to show the effectiveness of the proposed construction.

Journal of Communications and Networks•Jun 1, 2018•18 citations
It is reasonable to expect the theory of quantum codes to be simplified in the case of codes of minimum distance 2; thus it makes sense to examine such codes in the hopes that techniques that prove effective there will generalize. With this in mind, we present a number of results on codes of minimum distance 2. We first compute the linear programming bound on the dimension of such a code, then show that this bound can only be attained when the code either is of even length, or is of length 3 or 5. We next consider questions of uniqueness, showing that the optimal code of length 2 or 1 is unique (implying that the well-known one-qubit-in-five single-error correcting code is unique), and presenting nonadditive optimal codes of all greater even lengths. Finally, we compute the full automorphism group of the more important distance 2 codes, allowing us to determine the full automorphism group of any GF(4)-linear code.
In this paper, we endeavor for an extensive study of [[n,n-3,2]] codes of odd length. We begin with the computation of the linear programming bound on the dimension of distance 2 codes of odd length and show that the [[n,n-3,2]] codes are optimal. We next find their generator matrix, stabilizer structure and also show that these codes are impure or degenerate except the [[3,0,2]] code which is pure by convention. In degenerate codes, distinct errors do not necessarily take the code space to orthogonal space. So sometimes they can correct more errors than that they can identify and has the capacity to store more information than a nondegenerate code. The present paper also establishes the existence of ((2m+1,2^(2m-2),2)) codes from the ((2m,2^(2m-2),2)) codes for all m>1. We have also constructed another class of distance 2 codes which are constructed using distance 3 codes.
Most known quantum codes are additive, meaning the code can be described as the simultaneous eigenspace of an Abelian subgroup of the Pauli group. While in some scenarios such codes are strictly suboptimal, very little is understood about how to construct nonadditive codes with good performance. Here we present a family of distance 2 nonadditive quantum codes for all odd block lengths n, that has a particularly simple form. Our codes detect single qubit errors (or correct single qubit erasures) while encoding a higher dimensional space than is possible with an additive code or, for n> or =11, any previous codes. We exhibit the encoding circuits and automorphism group for our codes as well.
The most popular class of quantum error correcting codes is stabilizer codes. Binary quantum stabilizer codes have been well studied, and Calderbank, Rains, Shor and Sloane (July 1998) have constructed a table of upper bounds on the minimum distance of these codes using linear programming methods. However, not much is known in the case of nonbinary stabilizer codes. In this thesis, we establish a bridge between selforthogonal classical codes over the finite field containing q2 elements and quantum codes, extending and unifying previous work by Matsumoto and Uyematsu (2000), Ashikhmin and Knill (November 2001), Kim and Walker (2004). We construct a table of upper bounds on the minimum distance of the stabilizer codes using linear programming methods that are tighter than currently known bounds. Finally, we derive code construction techniques that will help us find new codes from existing ones. All these results help us to gain a better understanding of the theory of nonbinary stabilizer codes.
Abstract — Optimal quantum stabilizer codes of distance 3 are explicitly constructed for all lengths except for the following four families of lengths 8fm − {1, 2} and fm+2 − {2, 3} with fm = 4 m −1 3 and m ≥ 2 being integer, for which our codes are of the best parameters known and are only one logical qubit less than the quantum Hamming bound. The optimality of our codes is ensured by saturating either the quantum Hamming bound or a stronger bound for three families of lengths 8fm + {1, 2} and fm+2 − 1 with m ≥ 1 derived from the linear programming bound. For the lengths less than 128 three previously unknown codes [[36, 29, 3]], [[37, 30, 3]] and [[81, 73, 3]] have been found. Index Terms — quantum error correction, 1-error correcting stabilizer codes, quantum Hamming bound, linear programming bound, optimal codes I.
We establish that transversal diagonal gates on exact qubit codes of distance at least two can be exhaustively classified within a finite search space. Although code-preserving physical gates can have continuous phases, any projective logical action induced by a transversal diagonal gate can always be realized by a physical gate of finite order. Crucially, we prove that this physical order has an upper bound determined solely by the code parameters. This order bound enables the subset-sum-linear-programming (SSLP) framework introduced in arXiv:2504.20847 to exhaustively enumerate all candidate discrete symmetries, after which the Knill-Laflamme equations determine the remaining continuous code parameters. Applying this method to the nontrivial diagonal sector of exact ((6,2,3))((6,2,3))((6,2,3)) codes, SSLP yields 666666 candidate symmetry classes, of which exactly 151515 are realizable, supporting full projective diagonal logical cyclic groups of orders 222, 333, and 555. In particular, for order 555, the code is unique up to local unitaries and qubit permutations, equivalent to the code constructed in arXiv:2504.20847. This code also attains the minimum length n=6n=6n=6 among exact ((n,2,≥3))((n, 2, \ge 3))((n,2,≥3)) codes whose full projective transversal group cannot be conjugated into the projective Clifford group.
In order to construct quantum error correction code, we consider additive codes over Galois field GF(4), which are self-orthogonal with respect to a certain Hermitian product. In this paper, we first propose a new approach to the construction of Hermitian self-orthogonal linear codes, applying the extension to get a longer length, and prove the codes have good minimum distance. Then, we investigate the corresponding quantum stabilizer codes from the classical codes. Six optimal quantum stabilizer codes have been achieved to show the effectiveness of the proposed construction.