Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9612028

Threshold Estimate for Fault Tolerant Quantum Computation

Christof Zalka

Published Dec 8, 1996• 37 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

I make a rough estimate of the accuracy threshold for fault tolerant quantum computing with concatenated codes. First I consider only gate errors and use the depolarizing channel error model. I will follow P.Shor (quant-ph/9505011) for fault tolerant error correction (FTEC) and the fault tolerant implementation of elementary operations on states encoded by the 7-qubit code. A simple computer simulation suggests a threshold for gate errors of the order ε\approx 10^{-3} or better. I also give a simple argument that the threshold for memory errors is about 10 times smaller, thus ε\approx 10^{-4}.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9612028

Related papers

ERROR THRESHOLD ESTIMATION BY MEANS OF THE [[7,1,3]] CSS QUANTUM CODE

Pedro J. Salas, Angel L. Sanz

The states needed in quantum computation are extremely affected by decoherence. Several methods have been proposed to control error spreading. They use two main tools: fault-tolerant constructions and concatenated quantum error correcting codes. In this work, we estimate the threshold conditions necessary to make a long enough quantum computation. The [[7,1,3]] CSS quantum code together with the Shor method to measure the error syndrome is used. No concatenation is included. The decoherence is introduced by means of the depolarizing channel error model, obtaining several thresholds from the numerical simulation. Regarding the maintenance of a qubit stabilized in the memory, the error probability must be smaller than 2.9 × 10-5. In order to implement a one or two-qubit encoded gate in an effective fault-tolerant way, it is possible to choose an adequate non-encoded noisy gate if the memory error probability is smaller than 1.3 × 10-5. In addition, fulfilling this last condition permits us to assume a more efficient behavior compared to the equivalent non-encoded process.

arXiv:quant-ph/0411042•International Journal of Quantum Information•May 31, 2005•2 citations

Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Constant Error Rate

Dorit Aharonov, Michael Ben-Or

This paper shows that quantum computation can be made fault-tolerant against errors and inaccuracies when $\eta$, the probability for an error in a qubit or a gate, is smaller than a constant threshold $\eta_c$. This result improves on Shor's result [Proceedings of the 37th Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1996, pp. 56–65], which shows how to perform fault-tolerant quantum computation when the error rate $\eta$ decays polylogarithmically with the size of the computation, an assumption which is physically unreasonable. The cost of making the quantum circuit fault-tolerant in our construction is polylogarithmic in time and space. Our result holds for a very general local noise model, which includes probabilistic errors, decoherence, amplitude damping, depolarization, and systematic inaccuracies in the gates. Moreover, we allow exponentially decaying correlations between the errors both in space and in time. Fault-tolerant computation can be performed with any universal set of gates. The result also holds for quantum particles with $p>2$ states, namely, p-qudits, and is also generalized to one-dimensional quantum computers with only nearest-neighbor interactions. No measurements, or classical operations, are required during the quantum computation. We estimate the threshold of our construction to be $\eta_c\simeq 10^{-6}$, in the best case. By this we show that local noise is in principle not an obstacle for scalable quantum computation. The main ingredient of our proof is the computation on states encoded by a quantum error correcting code (QECC). To this end we introduce a special class of Calderbank–Shor–Steane (CSS) codes, called polynomial codes (the quantum analogue of Reed–Solomon codes). Their nice algebraic structure allows all of the encoded gates to be transversal. We also provide another version of the proof which uses more general CSS codes, but its encoded gates are slightly less elegant. To achieve fault tolerance, we encode the quantum circuit by another circuit by using one of these QECCs. This step is repeated polyloglog many times, each step slightly improving the effective error rate, to achieve the desired reliability. The resulting circuit exhibits a hierarchical structure, and for the analysis of its robustness we borrow terminology from Khalfin and Tsirelson [Found. Phys., 22 (1992), pp. 879–948] and Gács [Advances in Computing Research: A Research Annual: Randomness and Computation, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1989]. The paper is to a large extent self-contained. In particular, we provide simpler proofs for many of the known results we use, such as the fact that it suffices to correct for bit-flips and phase-flips, the correctness of CSS codes, and the fact that two-qubit gates are universal, together with their extensions to higher-dimensional particles. We also provide full proofs of the universality of the sets of gates we use (the proof of universality was missing in Shor's paper). This paper thus provides a self-contained and complete proof of universal fault-tolerant quantum computation in the presence of local noise.

SIAM Journal on Computing•Jan 1, 2008•507 citations

Overhead and noise threshold of fault-tolerant quantum error correction

Andrew M. Steane

Fault-tolerant quantum error correction (QEC) networks are studied by a combination of numerical and approximate analytical treatments. The probability of failure of the recovery operation is calculated for a variety of Calderbank-Shor-Steane codes, including large block codes and concatenated codes. Recent insights into the syndrome extraction process, which render the whole process more efficient and more noise tolerant, are incorporated. The average number of recoveries that can be completed without failure is thus estimated as a function of various parameters. The main parameters are the gate $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ and memory $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ failure rates, the physical scale-up of the computer size, and the time ${t}_{m}$ required for measurements and classical processing. The achievable computation size is given as a surface in parameter space. This indicates the noise threshold as well as other information. It is found that concatenated codes based on the $[[23,1,7]]$ Golay code give higher thresholds than those based on the $[[7,1,3]]$ Hamming code under most conditions. The threshold gate noise ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{0}$ is a function of $\ensuremath{\epsilon}/\ensuremath{\gamma}$ and ${t}_{m};$ example values are ${\ensuremath{\epsilon}/\ensuremath{\gamma}{,t}_{m},{\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{0}}={{1,1,10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}},$ ${0.01,1,3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}},$ ${{1,100,10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}},$ ${0.01,100,2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}},$ assuming zero cost for information transport. This represents an order of magnitude increase in tolerated memory noise, compared with previous calculations, which is made possible by recent insights into the fault-tolerant QEC process.

arXiv:quant-ph/0207119•Physical Review A•Oct 22, 2003•369 citations

Introduction to error correcting codes in quantum computers

P. J. Salas-Peralta

"The goal of this paper is to review the theoretical basis for achieving a faithful quantum information transmission and processing in the presence of noise. Initially, encoding and decoding, implementing gates and quantum error correction will be considered error-free. Finally, we shall relax this non-realistic assumption, introducing the quantum fault-tolerant concept. The existence of an error threshold permits us to conclude that there is no physical law preventing a quantum computer from being built. An error model based on the depolarising channel will be able to provide a simple estimate of the storage or memory computation error threshold: 5.2 10. The encoding is made by means of the [[7,1,3]] Calderbank-Shor-Steane quantum code, and Shor´s fault-tolerant method is used to measure the stabiliser´s generators."

Revista Mexicana de Física E•Jan 12, 2006•0 citations

Fault-tolerant quantum computation with constant error

Dorit Aharonov, Michael Ben-Or

Recently Shor showed how to perform fault tolerant quantum computation when the error probability is logarithmically small. We improve this bound and describe fault tolerant quantum computation when the error probability is smaller than some constant threshold. The cost is polylogarithmic in time and space, and no measurements are used during the quantum computation. The result holds also for quantum circuits which operate on nearest neighbors only. To achieve this noise resistance, we use concatenated quantum error correcting codes. The scheme presented is general, and works with all quantum codes that satisfy some restrictions, namely that the code is ``proper''. We present two explicit classes of proper quantum codes. The first example of proper quantum codes generalizes classical secret sharing with polynomials. The second uses a known class of quantum codes and converts it to a proper code. This class is defined over a field with p elements, so the elementary quantum particle is not a qubit but a ``qupit''. With our codes, the threshold is about 10^(-6). Hopefully, this paper motivates a search for proper quantum codes with higher thresholds, at which point quantum computation becomes practical.

arXiv:quant-ph/9611025•ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•Jan 1, 1997•630 citations

Fault-tolerant computation without concatenation

Eric Dennis

It has been known that error-correction via concatenated codes can be done with exponentially small failure rate if the error rate for physical qubits is below a certain accuracy threshold (probably ∼ 10 −3 –10 −6). Other, un-concatenated codes with their own attractive features—e.g., an accuracy threshold ∼ 10 −2 —have also been studied. A method to obtain universal computation is presented here which does not rely on any concatenated structure within the code itself, but instead emulates this structure with logical qubits in order to construct an encoded Toffoli gate. This realizes ∼ 10 −2 as a threshold for fault-tolerant quantum computation. 1 QEC codes and universal computation In the “space ” of all possible quantum error-correcting codes, much recent work has focused on a relatively small class, namely concatenated codes [1]–[7]. The basic idea behind these is to improve the results of a given few-qubit code by

•May 7, 1999•2 citations
I make a rough estimate of the accuracy threshold for fault tolerant quantum computing with concatenated codes. First I consider only gate errors and use the depolarizing channel error model. I will follow P.Shor (quant-ph/9505011) for fault tolerant error correction (FTEC) and the fault tolerant implementation of elementary operations on states encoded by the 7-qubit code. A simple computer simulation suggests a threshold for gate errors of the order ε\approx 10^{-3} or better. I also give a simple argument that the threshold for memory errors is about 10 times smaller, thus ε\approx 10^{-4}.
The states needed in quantum computation are extremely affected by decoherence. Several methods have been proposed to control error spreading. They use two main tools: fault-tolerant constructions and concatenated quantum error correcting codes. In this work, we estimate the threshold conditions necessary to make a long enough quantum computation. The [[7,1,3]] CSS quantum code together with the Shor method to measure the error syndrome is used. No concatenation is included. The decoherence is introduced by means of the depolarizing channel error model, obtaining several thresholds from the numerical simulation. Regarding the maintenance of a qubit stabilized in the memory, the error probability must be smaller than 2.9 × 10-5. In order to implement a one or two-qubit encoded gate in an effective fault-tolerant way, it is possible to choose an adequate non-encoded noisy gate if the memory error probability is smaller than 1.3 × 10-5. In addition, fulfilling this last condition permits us to assume a more efficient behavior compared to the equivalent non-encoded process.
This paper shows that quantum computation can be made fault-tolerant against errors and inaccuracies when η\etaη, the probability for an error in a qubit or a gate, is smaller than a constant threshold ηc\eta_cηc​. This result improves on Shor's result [Proceedings of the 37th Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1996, pp. 56–65], which shows how to perform fault-tolerant quantum computation when the error rate η\etaη decays polylogarithmically with the size of the computation, an assumption which is physically unreasonable. The cost of making the quantum circuit fault-tolerant in our construction is polylogarithmic in time and space. Our result holds for a very general local noise model, which includes probabilistic errors, decoherence, amplitude damping, depolarization, and systematic inaccuracies in the gates. Moreover, we allow exponentially decaying correlations between the errors both in space and in time. Fault-tolerant computation can be performed with any universal set of gates. The result also holds for quantum particles with p>2p>2p>2 states, namely, p-qudits, and is also generalized to one-dimensional quantum computers with only nearest-neighbor interactions. No measurements, or classical operations, are required during the quantum computation. We estimate the threshold of our construction to be ηc≃10−6\eta_c\simeq 10^{-6}ηc​≃10−6, in the best case. By this we show that local noise is in principle not an obstacle for scalable quantum computation. The main ingredient of our proof is the computation on states encoded by a quantum error correcting code (QECC). To this end we introduce a special class of Calderbank–Shor–Steane (CSS) codes, called polynomial codes (the quantum analogue of Reed–Solomon codes). Their nice algebraic structure allows all of the encoded gates to be transversal. We also provide another version of the proof which uses more general CSS codes, but its encoded gates are slightly less elegant. To achieve fault tolerance, we encode the quantum circuit by another circuit by using one of these QECCs. This step is repeated polyloglog many times, each step slightly improving the effective error rate, to achieve the desired reliability. The resulting circuit exhibits a hierarchical structure, and for the analysis of its robustness we borrow terminology from Khalfin and Tsirelson [Found. Phys., 22 (1992), pp. 879–948] and Gács [Advances in Computing Research: A Research Annual: Randomness and Computation, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1989]. The paper is to a large extent self-contained. In particular, we provide simpler proofs for many of the known results we use, such as the fact that it suffices to correct for bit-flips and phase-flips, the correctness of CSS codes, and the fact that two-qubit gates are universal, together with their extensions to higher-dimensional particles. We also provide full proofs of the universality of the sets of gates we use (the proof of universality was missing in Shor's paper). This paper thus provides a self-contained and complete proof of universal fault-tolerant quantum computation in the presence of local noise.
Fault-tolerant quantum error correction (QEC) networks are studied by a combination of numerical and approximate analytical treatments. The probability of failure of the recovery operation is calculated for a variety of Calderbank-Shor-Steane codes, including large block codes and concatenated codes. Recent insights into the syndrome extraction process, which render the whole process more efficient and more noise tolerant, are incorporated. The average number of recoveries that can be completed without failure is thus estimated as a function of various parameters. The main parameters are the gate $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ and memory $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ failure rates, the physical scale-up of the computer size, and the time tm{t}_{m}tm​ required for measurements and classical processing. The achievable computation size is given as a surface in parameter space. This indicates the noise threshold as well as other information. It is found that concatenated codes based on the [[23,1,7]][[23,1,7]][[23,1,7]] Golay code give higher thresholds than those based on the [[7,1,3]][[7,1,3]][[7,1,3]] Hamming code under most conditions. The threshold gate noise ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{0}$ is a function of $\ensuremath{\epsilon}/\ensuremath{\gamma}$ and tm;{t}_{m};tm​; example values are ${\ensuremath{\epsilon}/\ensuremath{\gamma}{,t}_{m},{\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{0}}={{1,1,10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}},$ ${0.01,1,3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}},$ ${{1,100,10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}},$ ${0.01,100,2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}},$ assuming zero cost for information transport. This represents an order of magnitude increase in tolerated memory noise, compared with previous calculations, which is made possible by recent insights into the fault-tolerant QEC process.
"The goal of this paper is to review the theoretical basis for achieving a faithful quantum information transmission and processing in the presence of noise. Initially, encoding and decoding, implementing gates and quantum error correction will be considered error-free. Finally, we shall relax this non-realistic assumption, introducing the quantum fault-tolerant concept. The existence of an error threshold permits us to conclude that there is no physical law preventing a quantum computer from being built. An error model based on the depolarising channel will be able to provide a simple estimate of the storage or memory computation error threshold: 5.2 10. The encoding is made by means of the [[7,1,3]] Calderbank-Shor-Steane quantum code, and Shor´s fault-tolerant method is used to measure the stabiliser´s generators."
Recently Shor showed how to perform fault tolerant quantum computation when the error probability is logarithmically small. We improve this bound and describe fault tolerant quantum computation when the error probability is smaller than some constant threshold. The cost is polylogarithmic in time and space, and no measurements are used during the quantum computation. The result holds also for quantum circuits which operate on nearest neighbors only. To achieve this noise resistance, we use concatenated quantum error correcting codes. The scheme presented is general, and works with all quantum codes that satisfy some restrictions, namely that the code is ``proper''. We present two explicit classes of proper quantum codes. The first example of proper quantum codes generalizes classical secret sharing with polynomials. The second uses a known class of quantum codes and converts it to a proper code. This class is defined over a field with p elements, so the elementary quantum particle is not a qubit but a ``qupit''. With our codes, the threshold is about 10^(-6). Hopefully, this paper motivates a search for proper quantum codes with higher thresholds, at which point quantum computation becomes practical.
It has been known that error-correction via concatenated codes can be done with exponentially small failure rate if the error rate for physical qubits is below a certain accuracy threshold (probably ∼ 10 −3 –10 −6). Other, un-concatenated codes with their own attractive features—e.g., an accuracy threshold ∼ 10 −2 —have also been studied. A method to obtain universal computation is presented here which does not rely on any concatenated structure within the code itself, but instead emulates this structure with logical qubits in order to construct an encoded Toffoli gate. This realizes ∼ 10 −2 as a threshold for fault-tolerant quantum computation. 1 QEC codes and universal computation In the “space ” of all possible quantum error-correcting codes, much recent work has focused on a relatively small class, namely concatenated codes [1]–[7]. The basic idea behind these is to improve the results of a given few-qubit code by