We investigate the power of quantum computers when they are required to return an answer that is guaranteed to be correct after a time that is upper-bounded by a polynomial in the worst case. We show that a natural generalization of Simon's problem can be solved in this way, whereas previous algorithms required quantum polynomial time in the expected sense only, without upper bounds on the worst-case running time. This is achieved by generalizing both Simon's and Grover's algorithms and combining them in a novel way. It follows that there is a decision problem that can be solved in exact quantum polynomial time, which would require expected exponential time on any classical bounded-error probabilistic computer if the data is supplied as a black box.
Building on the work of Deutsch and Jozsa, we construct oracles relative to which (1) there is a decision problem that can be solved with certainty in worst-case polynomial time on the quantum computer, yet it cannot be solved classically in probabilistic expected polynomial time if errors are not tolerated, nor even in nondeterministic polynomial time, and (2) there is a decision problem that can be solved in exponential time on the quantum computer, which requires double exponential time on all but finitely many instances on any classical deterministic computer.
Building on work of Deutsch and Jozsa, we construct oracles relative to which (1) there is a decision problem that can be solved with certainty in worst-case polynomial time on the quantum computer, yet it cannot be solved classically in probabilistic expected polynomial time if errors are not tolerated nor even in nondeterministic polynomial time, and (2) there is a decision problem that can be solved in exponential time on the quantum computer, which requires double exponential time on all but finitely many instances on any classical deterministic computer. The results given in this paper have been presented at the 7th Annual IEEE Symposium on Structure in Complexity Theory, Boston, June 1992, and at the Workshop on Physics and Computation, PhysComp '92, Dallas, October 1992; they have appeared in preliminary form in those Proceedings [7, 8]. y Supported in part by an Nserc postgraduate fellowship. z Supported in part by Canada's Nserc E. W. R. Steacie Memorial Fellowship an...
This paper continues the study of the power of oracles to separate quantum com.plexity classes from classical (including probabilistic and nondeterministic) complexity classes, which we initiated in an earlier paper [5]. The new results are that, under appropriate oracles, (1) there is a decision problem that can be solved in polynomial time on the quantum computer, which would classically require exponential time in the worst case even on a nondeterministic computer (in particular QP g NP relative to this oracle), and (2) there is a decision problem that can be solved in exponential time on the quantum computer for which any deterministic classical computer would require double exponential time on all but finitely many instances.
The quantum model of computation is a probabilistic model, similar to the probabilistic Turing Machine, in which the laws of chance are those obeyed by particles on a quantum mechanical scale, rather than the rules familiar to us from the macroscopic world. We present here a problem of distinguishing between two fairly natural classes of function, which can provably be solved exponentially faster in the quantum model than in the classical probabilistic one, when the function is given as an oracle drawn equiprobably from the uniform distribution on either class. We thus offer compelling evidence that the quantum model may have significantly more complexity theoretic power than the probabilistic Turing Machine. In fact, drawing on this work, Shor (1994) has recently developed remarkable new quantum polynomial-time algorithms for the discrete logarithm and integer factoring problems.>
Classical approximation complexity asks what solution quality can be guaranteed with polynomial-time computation. The classes APX, PTAS, and FPTAS distinguish a fixed approximation ratio, approximation to any fixed accuracy, and approximation schemes whose running time is also polynomial in inverse accuracy. Their randomized counterparts are R-APX, R-PTAS, and R-FPTAS. We define bounded-error quantum counterparts BQ-APX, BQ-PTAS, and BQ-FPTAS. Membership requires a uniform quantum algorithm that, on every input, returns a feasible classical solution achieving at least the claimed approximation ratio with probability at least 2/3. Scores (objective values) must be efficiently classically computable. Running time includes parameter selection, preparation, measurement, decoding, and repetition. Many quantum optimization methods are used heuristically, and high benchmark scores alone do not establish these guarantees. We further establish a conditional hierarchy for logarithmic, polynomial, and exponential approximation factors.
Assuming NP
⊈ BQP, the quantum classes form a strict hierarchy. Problems based on prime factorization and discrete logarithms give conditional quantum-classical separations. Certified Maximum Order has an exact quantum algorithm, while any randomized polynomial-time algorithm guaranteeing at least an inverse-polynomial approximation ratio on every input would yield efficient factoring. Discrete-Logarithm Fitting has an exact quantum algorithm and a deterministic one-half approximation, but any fixed improvement over one half would give a randomized polynomial-time algorithm for the safe-prime discrete logarithm problem. Our results show, under explicit complexity assumptions, that quantum computation can improve worst-case approximation guarantees. A quantum-classical gap for common problems such as MaxCut or MaxSAT remains open.